The Dosage of Exercise Intensity According to the Exertion Perceived by Female Patients with Myocardial Infarction

  • K. Meyer
Conference paper


With coronary patients the dosage of exercise is often decided in accordance with the perceived exertion. Local changes in the muscles involved during exercise and central changes in the cardiac and pulmonal system are responsible for the subjective perception of the exertion (Carton et al. 1985; Demello et al. 1987; Mihevic 1981; Robertson 1982). These two factors yield the subjectively experienced overall exertion, which correlates with the metabolic and cardiorespiratory variables lactate, V02, ventilation, and heart rate. According to experimental studies, the subjective perception of exertion to be “somewhat hard” (item 13 in the BORG Scale; Table 1) corresponds to an objective intensity of exercise exertion of the limited anaerobic threshold of 4 mmol/1 lactate (Demello et al. 1987; Dressenhofer et al. 1981), to 75% of the maximum symptom-limited heart rate, and to 70% of the maximum symptom-limited V02 (Gutmann et al. 1981). These correlations are independent of sex (Stephenson et al. 1982), age (Demello et al. 1987), and problems associated with angina pectoris or orthopedic troubles (Noble 1982). Viewed from the perspective of exercise therapy, the following questions are raised: (1) how do female patients perceive exertion at different training intensities, and (2) how does the perceived exertion relate to the above-mentioned parameters. In addition, the question of whether the perception of exertion can be safely and accurately utilized to determine the dosage of cardiological exercise therapy must also be examined.


Exercise Intensity Training Intensity Anaerobic Threshold BORG Scale Lactate Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Borg G (1970) Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. Scand J Rehabil Med 2:92PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Carton RL, Rhodes EC (1985) A critical review of the literature on rating scales for perceived exertion. Sports Med 2:148–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Demello JJ, Cureton J et al. (1987) Ratings of perceived exertion at the lactate threshold in trained and untrained men and woman. Med Sci Sports Exerc 19:354PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dressenhofer R, Smith JL et al. (1981) Quantification of exercise responses at anaerobic threshold in healthy men: relation to prescribed training heart rate (Abstr). Med Sci Sports Exerc 13:79Google Scholar
  5. Ekblom B, Goldbarg AN (1971) The influence of physical training and other factors on the subjective rating of perceived exertion. Acta Physiol Scand 83:399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gutmann MC, Squires RW et al. (1981) Perceived exertion-heart rate relationship during exercise testing and training in cardiac patients. J Cardiac Rehabil 1:52Google Scholar
  7. Mihevic PM (1981) Sensory cues of perceived exertion: a review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 13:150–163PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Noble JB (1982) Clinical applications of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14:406PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Robertson RJ (1982) Central signals of perceived exertion during dynamic exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14:390–396PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Stephenson LA, Kolka MA, Wilkerson JE (1982) Perceived exertion and anaerobic threshold during the menstrual cycle. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14:218PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Meyer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations