Skip to main content

The Case for Morphometry in Diagnostic Pathology

  • Chapter
A Manual of Morphometry in Diagnostic Pathology

Abstract

The reasons for the increasing interest in and enthusiasm for the application of morphometry in diagnostic pathology are its advantages of objectivity, reproducibility and detection possibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baak, J.P.A., Oort, J., Bouw, G.M. and Stolte, L.A.M. (1977). Quantitative morphology: methods and materials. I. Stereology and morphometry. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 7, 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baak, J.P.A., Kurver, P.H.J, Diegenbach, P.C., Delemarre, J.F., Brekelmans, E.C.M. and Nieuwlaat, J.E. (1981). Discrimination of hyperplasia and carcinoma of the endometrium by quantitative microscopy — a feasibility study. Histopathology 5, 61–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baak, J.P.A., Lindeman, J., Overdiep, S.H. and Langley, F.A. (1982). Disagreement of histopathologi-cal diagnosis of different pathologists in ovarian tumors — with some theoretical considerations. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynec. Reprod. Biol. 13, 51–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cocker, J., Fox, H. and Langley, F.A. (1968). Consistency in the histological diagnosis of epithelial abnormalities of the cervix uteri. J. Clin. Pathol. 21, 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coppleson, L.W., Factor, R.M., Strum, S.B., Graff, P.W. and Rappaport, H. (1970). Observer disagreement in the classification and histology of Hodgkin’s disease. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 45, 731–740.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Delides, G.S., Garas, G., Georgouli, G., Jiotzis, D., Lecca, J., Liva, T. and Elemenouglou, J. (1982). Intralaboratory variations in the grading of breast carcinoma. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 106, 126–128.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Editorial (1976). Objectivity in pathology. Lancet 1, 288–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein, A.R., Gelfman, N.A. and Yesner, R.A. (1970). Observer variability in the histopathologic diagnosis of lung cancer. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 101, 671–684.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fischmeister, H.F. (1975). Characterization of porous structures by stereological measurements. Powder Metall. Int. 7, 178–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, H. (1980). A study of consistency and value of histological grading of borderline tumours of the ovary. Presentation XIIIth Congress International Academy of Pathology, September, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garceau, A.J. (1964). The natural history of cirrhosis. II. The influence of alcohol and prior hepatitis on pathology and prognosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 271, 1173–1179.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garland, L.H. (1959). Studies on the accuracy of diagnostic procedures. Am. J. Roentgenol. 82, 25–38.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilchrist, K.W., Gould, V.E., Hirschl, S. et al. (1982). Interobserver variation on the identification of breast carcinoma in intramammary lymphatics. Hum. Pathol., 13, 170–172.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, H.H. (1982). Management of small-cell anaplastic carcinoma, 1980–1982. In: Lung cancer 1982, S. Ishikawa, Y. Hayata, and K. Suemasu, editors, Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp. 31–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug, H. (1980). The significance of quantitative stereologic experimental procedures in pathology. Pathol. Res. Pract. 166, 144–164.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, O.H. and Sandnes, K. (1971). The reliability of pathologists. A study of some cases of lymph node biopsies showing giant follicular hyperplasia or lymphoma. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand [A] 79, 330–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Javey, H., Borazjani, G., Behnard, S. and Langley, F.A. (1979). Discrepancies in the diagnosis of hy-datiformmole. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 86, 480–483.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, W.H. and Zivoloch, M.R. (1977). The accuracy and consistency of the cytologic classification of squamous lesions of the uterine cervix. Acta Cytol. 21, 519–523.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, F.A. (1978). Quality control in histopathology and diagnostic cytology. Histopathology 2, 3–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, T.E., Little, J.H., Orell, S.R. and Prade, M. (1980). International pathologists congruence survey on quantitation of malignant melanoma. Pathology 12, 245–253.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, A. and Blake, J. (1975). Observer error in histological assessment of marrow hypocellularity. J. Clin. Pathol. 28, 104–108.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pagnini, C.A. and Rugge, M. (1982). Gastric cancer: problems in histological diagnosis. Histopathology 6, 391–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penner, D.W. (1973). Quality control and quality evaluation in histopathology and cytopathology. Pathol. Annu. 8, 1–19.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pool, C.H.R.W., Diegenbach, P.C. and Okkeloen, P.J.T. (1979). Quantitative succinate dehydrogenase histochemistry: II. A comparison between visual and quantitative muscle fibre typing. Histochemistry 64, 263–272.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ringsted, J., Amtrup, F., Asklund, C. et al. (1978). Reliability of histopathological diagnosis of squamous epithelial changes of the uterine cervix. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. [A], 86, 273–278.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roesle, R. and Roulet, F. (1932). Mass und Zahl in der Pathologie. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, R.C., Dunnill, M.S. and Anderson, J.A. (1971). A quantitative study of bronchial mucous gland volume, emphysema and smoking in a necropsy population. J. Pathol. 104, 59–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saxen, E., Franssila, K., Bjamason, O. et al (1978). Observer variation in histologic classification of thyroid cancer. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. [A], 86, 483–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, E., Brozek, J. and Keys, A. (1949). Variability of the electrocardiogram in normal young men. Am. Heart J. 38, 407–422.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sissons, H.A. (1975). Agreement and disagreement between pathologists in histological diagnosis. Postgrad. Med. J. 51, 685–689.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenkvist, B., Westman-Naeser, S., Vergelius, J. et al (1979). Analysis of reproducibility of subjective grading systems for breast carcinoma. J. Clin. Pathol. 32, 979–985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Symmers, W. St. C. (1968). Survey of the eventual diagnosis in 600 cases referred for a second histological opinion after an initial biopsy diagnosis of Hodgkin’s disease. J. Clin. Pathol. 21, 650–653.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weibel, E.R. (1969). Stereological principles for morphometry in electron microscopy. Int. Rev. Cytol. 26, 235–302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weibel, E.R. and Elias, H. (1967). Quantitative methods in morphology, Springer, Berlin, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baak, J.P.A., Oort, J. (1983). The Case for Morphometry in Diagnostic Pathology. In: A Manual of Morphometry in Diagnostic Pathology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74823-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74823-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-74825-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-74823-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics