Abstract
The reasons for the increasing interest in and enthusiasm for the application of morphometry in diagnostic pathology are its advantages of objectivity, reproducibility and detection possibility.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baak, J.P.A., Oort, J., Bouw, G.M. and Stolte, L.A.M. (1977). Quantitative morphology: methods and materials. I. Stereology and morphometry. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 7, 43–52.
Baak, J.P.A., Kurver, P.H.J, Diegenbach, P.C., Delemarre, J.F., Brekelmans, E.C.M. and Nieuwlaat, J.E. (1981). Discrimination of hyperplasia and carcinoma of the endometrium by quantitative microscopy — a feasibility study. Histopathology 5, 61–68.
Baak, J.P.A., Lindeman, J., Overdiep, S.H. and Langley, F.A. (1982). Disagreement of histopathologi-cal diagnosis of different pathologists in ovarian tumors — with some theoretical considerations. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynec. Reprod. Biol. 13, 51–55.
Cocker, J., Fox, H. and Langley, F.A. (1968). Consistency in the histological diagnosis of epithelial abnormalities of the cervix uteri. J. Clin. Pathol. 21, 64–70.
Coppleson, L.W., Factor, R.M., Strum, S.B., Graff, P.W. and Rappaport, H. (1970). Observer disagreement in the classification and histology of Hodgkin’s disease. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 45, 731–740.
Delides, G.S., Garas, G., Georgouli, G., Jiotzis, D., Lecca, J., Liva, T. and Elemenouglou, J. (1982). Intralaboratory variations in the grading of breast carcinoma. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 106, 126–128.
Editorial (1976). Objectivity in pathology. Lancet 1, 288–289.
Feinstein, A.R., Gelfman, N.A. and Yesner, R.A. (1970). Observer variability in the histopathologic diagnosis of lung cancer. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 101, 671–684.
Fischmeister, H.F. (1975). Characterization of porous structures by stereological measurements. Powder Metall. Int. 7, 178–188.
Fox, H. (1980). A study of consistency and value of histological grading of borderline tumours of the ovary. Presentation XIIIth Congress International Academy of Pathology, September, Paris.
Garceau, A.J. (1964). The natural history of cirrhosis. II. The influence of alcohol and prior hepatitis on pathology and prognosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 271, 1173–1179.
Garland, L.H. (1959). Studies on the accuracy of diagnostic procedures. Am. J. Roentgenol. 82, 25–38.
Gilchrist, K.W., Gould, V.E., Hirschl, S. et al. (1982). Interobserver variation on the identification of breast carcinoma in intramammary lymphatics. Hum. Pathol., 13, 170–172.
Hansen, H.H. (1982). Management of small-cell anaplastic carcinoma, 1980–1982. In: Lung cancer 1982, S. Ishikawa, Y. Hayata, and K. Suemasu, editors, Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp. 31–54.
Haug, H. (1980). The significance of quantitative stereologic experimental procedures in pathology. Pathol. Res. Pract. 166, 144–164.
Iverson, O.H. and Sandnes, K. (1971). The reliability of pathologists. A study of some cases of lymph node biopsies showing giant follicular hyperplasia or lymphoma. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand [A] 79, 330–334.
Javey, H., Borazjani, G., Behnard, S. and Langley, F.A. (1979). Discrepancies in the diagnosis of hy-datiformmole. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 86, 480–483.
Kern, W.H. and Zivoloch, M.R. (1977). The accuracy and consistency of the cytologic classification of squamous lesions of the uterine cervix. Acta Cytol. 21, 519–523.
Langley, F.A. (1978). Quality control in histopathology and diagnostic cytology. Histopathology 2, 3–18.
Larsen, T.E., Little, J.H., Orell, S.R. and Prade, M. (1980). International pathologists congruence survey on quantitation of malignant melanoma. Pathology 12, 245–253.
Morley, A. and Blake, J. (1975). Observer error in histological assessment of marrow hypocellularity. J. Clin. Pathol. 28, 104–108.
Pagnini, C.A. and Rugge, M. (1982). Gastric cancer: problems in histological diagnosis. Histopathology 6, 391–398.
Penner, D.W. (1973). Quality control and quality evaluation in histopathology and cytopathology. Pathol. Annu. 8, 1–19.
Pool, C.H.R.W., Diegenbach, P.C. and Okkeloen, P.J.T. (1979). Quantitative succinate dehydrogenase histochemistry: II. A comparison between visual and quantitative muscle fibre typing. Histochemistry 64, 263–272.
Ringsted, J., Amtrup, F., Asklund, C. et al. (1978). Reliability of histopathological diagnosis of squamous epithelial changes of the uterine cervix. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. [A], 86, 273–278.
Roesle, R. and Roulet, F. (1932). Mass und Zahl in der Pathologie. Springer, Berlin.
Ryder, R.C., Dunnill, M.S. and Anderson, J.A. (1971). A quantitative study of bronchial mucous gland volume, emphysema and smoking in a necropsy population. J. Pathol. 104, 59–71.
Saxen, E., Franssila, K., Bjamason, O. et al (1978). Observer variation in histologic classification of thyroid cancer. Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. [A], 86, 483–486.
Simonson, E., Brozek, J. and Keys, A. (1949). Variability of the electrocardiogram in normal young men. Am. Heart J. 38, 407–422.
Sissons, H.A. (1975). Agreement and disagreement between pathologists in histological diagnosis. Postgrad. Med. J. 51, 685–689.
Stenkvist, B., Westman-Naeser, S., Vergelius, J. et al (1979). Analysis of reproducibility of subjective grading systems for breast carcinoma. J. Clin. Pathol. 32, 979–985.
Symmers, W. St. C. (1968). Survey of the eventual diagnosis in 600 cases referred for a second histological opinion after an initial biopsy diagnosis of Hodgkin’s disease. J. Clin. Pathol. 21, 650–653.
Weibel, E.R. (1969). Stereological principles for morphometry in electron microscopy. Int. Rev. Cytol. 26, 235–302.
Weibel, E.R. and Elias, H. (1967). Quantitative methods in morphology, Springer, Berlin, p. 11.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1983 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baak, J.P.A., Oort, J. (1983). The Case for Morphometry in Diagnostic Pathology. In: A Manual of Morphometry in Diagnostic Pathology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74823-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74823-3_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-74825-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-74823-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive