Advertisement

Physics Evaluation and Quality Control of Hyperthermia Equipment

  • P. N. Shrivastava
  • T. K. Saylor
Part of the Clinical Thermology book series (CLIN THERM)

Abstract

A typical configuration of modern hyperthermia equipment used in clinics for localized cancer treatment is shown in Fig. 3.1. It can be described as a closed loop system in that the energy deposited into tissues is controlled by a feedback mechanism depending on the temperature of one or more reference probes. The applicator in this system is designed to deposit electromagnetic or ultrasonic energy into tissues which, when absorbed, is converted into heat and raises the temperature of the tumor. The overall goal is to elevate the temperature of the entire tumor to above 42°C while maintaining the hot spots in normal tissues at below 46°C for periods of up to 1 h. Two to ten treatment sessions over a period of 6 weeks may be required for complete therapy. Clinical experience to date has shown that even this seemingly modest goal is difficult to achieve in a reliable and reproducible manner. The reasons for this are manifold. First, there is a lack of standard equipment to deposit energy in a controlled manner and generate optimum heating patterns in specific tumor sites.

Keywords

Coupling Efficiency Physic Evaluation Specific Absorption Rate Heating Pattern Hyperthermia Treatment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chou CK, Chen GW, Guy A, Luk K (1984) Formulas for preparing phantom muscle tissue at various radiofrequencies. Bioelectromagnetics 5: 435–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Christensen DA (1983) Thermometry and thermography. In: Storm FK (ed) Hyperthermia in cancer therapy. Hall Medical, Boston, pp 223–232Google Scholar
  3. Curley MG, Lele PP (1984) Some potential errors in measurement of temperatures in vivo during hyperthermia by ultrasound and electromagnetic energy. In: Overgaard J (ed) Hyperthermia oncology 1984, vol 1. Summary papers, proceedings of the 4th int symposium on hyperthermia oncology, Aarhus, Denmark, 2–6 July 1984. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 561–654Google Scholar
  4. Dewey WC, Hopwood LE, Sapareto SA, Gerweck LE (1977) Cellular responses to combinations of hyperthermia and radiation. Radiology 123: 463–479PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fessenden P, Lee ER, Samulski TV (1984) Direct temperature measurements. Cancer Res 4 (Suppl): 4799–4804Google Scholar
  6. Guy AW, Lehmann JF, Stonebridge JB, Sorensen CC (1978) Development of a 915-MHz direct contact applicator for therapeutic heating of tissue. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech MTT 26: 550–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lee ER, Fessenden P (1984) Evaluation of parylene insulated, flexible multiple junction thermocouple temperature probes for ultrasound hyperthermia. Proceedings of the 5th annual meeting, North American Hyperthermia Group, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  8. Nussbaum GH, Goodman RA, Bruce AA (1983) Improved applicator-patient coupling in microwave-induced hyperthermia. Med Phys 10 (5): 897–898PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Saylor TK, Shrivastava PN, Paliwal BR (1984) Performance and QA tests for thermometers used in hyperthermia (abstract). Radiation Research Society Abstracts, 16. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  10. Saylor TK, Matloubieh AY, Shrivastava PN (1988) Quality assurance for thermometry. In: Paliwal B, Hetzel F, Dewirst M (eds) Biological, physical and clinical aspects of hyperthermia. AAPM Monograph 16. American Institute of Physics, New York NY, pp 380–395Google Scholar
  11. Shrivastava PN, Saylor TK, Matloubieh AY, Paliwal BR (1988a) Hyperthermia thermometry evaluation: criteria and guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 14: 327–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shrivastava PN, Saylor TK, Matloubieh AY, Paliwal BR (1988 b) Hyperthermia quality assurance results. Int J Hyperthermia 4: 25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shrivastava PN, Luk K, Oleson J, Dewhirst M, Pajak T, Paliwal B, Perez C, Sapareto S, Saylor T, Steeves R (1989) Hyperthermia Quality Assurance Guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 16: 571–587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. N. Shrivastava
  • T. K. Saylor

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations