Simulation Technology for the Design and Scheduling of Material Handling and Storage Systems
The primary objective in acquiring material handling systems is usually the same: find the best system to meet objectives at the least cost. The design and operation of material handling systems is a complex and difficult task. Material handling is also not exactly a prestigeous focus for a career in U.S. industry. Our best talent is rarely assigned to manufacturing, much less material handling.
In Europe and Japan, material handling has long been recognized as a critical link in the manufacturing chain. In fact, it is the key element of integration in modern manufacturing systems.
This article will explore the use of simulation technology as one tool in the design and scheduling of material handling components of production systems. Material handling is examined as it is perceived in industry vis-a-vis its critical role in integrated manufacturing. Simulation and Scheduling is reviewed from a historical perspective and simulation-based tools for designing and scheduling production systems discussed. An overview of some important applications is provided followed by an overview of research needs regarding simulation and material handling.
KeywordsEurope Assure Expense Production Line Opera Tions
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Davies, O. Gaining flexibility in scheduling. Managing Automation. February, 1988.Google Scholar
- Grant, F. H. 1986. Production scheduling using simulation technology. Pp. 129–138 in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Simulation and Manufacturing. Bedford, England: IFS Conferences, L.d.Google Scholar
- Grant, F. H. 1987. Scheduling and loading techniques. In Production and Inventory Control Handbook, second edition, F. H. Grant and J. H. Green, Eds. Falls Church, VA: American Production and Inventory Control Society.Google Scholar
- Grant, F. H. 1987 Simulation in Designing and Scheduling Manufacturing Systems. Design and Analysis of Integrated Manufacturing Systems. National Academy Press. 1988.Google Scholar
- Grant, J. W., and S. A. Weiner. 1986. Simulation Series, Part 4: Factors to consider in choosing a graphically animated simulation system. Ind. Eng. 18(8):37-38 and 65-68.Google Scholar
- Haider, S. W., and J. Banks. 1986. Simulation Series, Part 3: Simulation software products for analyzing manufacturing systems. Ind. Eng. Errata 18 (9): 87.Google Scholar
- Miner, R. J., and L. J. Rolston. 1983. MAP/1 User’s Manual. West Lafayette, Ind.: Pritsker & Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
- Musselman, K. J. 1984. Simulation: A design tool for FMS. Manuf. Eng. 93 (3): 117–120.Google Scholar
- Pritsker, A. A. B., F. H. Grant, and S. D. Duket. 1986. Simulation in real time factory control. Presented at a conference on Real Time Factory Control, May 13 and 14, 1986. Dearborn, MI: Society of Manufacturing Engineers.Google Scholar
- Standridge, C. R., and A. A. B. Pritsker. 1987. TESS: The Extended Simulation Support System. West Lafayette, IN.: Pritsker & Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
- Tompkins, J. A., and J. A. White. 1984. Facilities Planning. New York: Wiley. White, J. A. 1985. Selling integrated systems. Modern Material Handling 40 (3): 29.Google Scholar
- White, J. A. 1985. Selling integrated systems. Modern Material Handling 40(3):29.Google Scholar
- White, J. A. 1986a. Becoming the systems integrator by the year 2020. P. 372 in Proceedings of Fall Industrial Engineering Conference. Norcross, GA.: Institute of Industrial Engineers.Google Scholar
- White, J. A. 1986b. Impediments to system integration. Modern Material Handling 41(10):23.Google Scholar