Skip to main content

Mating Probability, Body Size, and Inversion Polymorphism in a Colonizing Population of Drosophila buzzatii

  • Conference paper
Book cover Evolutionary Biology of Transient Unstable Populations

Abstract

Drosophila buzzatii is a colonizing species mainly associated with the cactus genus Opuntia. Originally from South America, it has spread over the world within historical times following these cacti (Carson, 1965; Barker and Mulley, 1976; Fontdevila et al., 1981). It shows a moderately high inversion polymorphism in two of the four major autosomes encompassing about 15% of the total euchromatin (Carson and Wasserman, 1965; Fontdevila et al., 1981, 1982; Ruiz et al., 1984, 1986; Fontdevila, this volume). We are trying to answer a very simple question: how does natural selection work on this polymorphism in the wild? The answer, though, may be not so simple. Of course, indirect evidence from natural populations and experimental work carried out during the last forty years, shows that inversions are adaptive devices and that selection may be of considerable magnitude (Dobzhansky, 1970; Anderson et al., 1975; Spiess, 1977; Sperlich and Pfriem, 1986). Field studies of natural selection, on the other hand, are scarce and it is by no means clear which is the relative importance of the different selection components and which is the magnitude of the selection coefficients in nature. We think that inversions continue to be a very useful tool to learn about natural selection in this regard.

“What we need is more knowledge about the ways in which populations, in fact, meet evolutionary challenges: What intensities of natural selection can they put up with, how far and how fast can they modify their phenotype (including their habitats)? Colonizing species are ones which we know to have been confronted by a challenge — that of their new location; and we often know, even quite precisely, how long they have been facing it.”

C.H. Waddington, 1965

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson WW, Dobzhansky Th, Pavlovsky O, Powell J and Yardley D (1975) Genetics of natural populations. XLII. Three decades of genetic change in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 29: 24–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson WW, Levine L, Olvera O, Powell JR, de la Rosa ME, Salceda VM, Gaso MI and Guzman J (1979) Evidence for selection by male mating success in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 76: 1519–1523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barker JSF and Mulley JC (1976) Isozyme variation in natural populations of Drosophila buzzatii. Evolution 30: 213–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman AJ (1948) Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2: 349–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butlin RK, Read IL and Day TH (1982) The effects of a chromosomal inversion on adult size and male mating success in the seaweed fly, Coelopa frigida. Heredity 49: 51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson HL (1965) Chromosomal morphism in geographically widespread species of Drosophila, pp. 503–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • In: Baker HG and Stebbins GL (eds). The Genetics of Colonizing Species Academic Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson HL and Wasserman M (1965) A widespread chromosomal polymorphism in a widespread species Drosophila buzzatii. Amer Natur 99: 111–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky Th (1970) Genetics of the Evolutionary Process. Columbia Univ Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1986) Natural Selection in the Wild. Princeton Univ Press Princeton New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing AW (1961) Body size and courtship behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim Behav 9: 93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing AW (1964) The influence of wing area on the courtship behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim Behav 12: 316–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontdevila A, Ruiz A, Alonso G and Ocaíia J (1981) Evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. I. Natural chromosomal polymorphism in colonized populations of the Old World. Evolution 35: 148–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontdevila A, Ruiz A, Ocala J and Alonso G (1982) Evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. II. How much has chromosomal polymorphism changed in colonization. Evolution 36: 843–851

    Google Scholar 

  • Krimbas CB (1967) The genetics of Drosophila subobscura populations. III. Inversion polymorphism and climatic factors. Molec Gen Genetics 99: 133–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krimbas CB and Loukas M (1980) The inversion polymorphism of Drosophila subob- scura. Evol Biol 12: 163–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Li CC and Horvitz DG (1953) Some methods of estimating the inbreeding coefficient. Am J Hum Genet 5: 107–117

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loukas M, Vergini Y and Krimbas CB (1981) The genetics of Drosophila subobscura populations. XVIII. Multiple insemination and sperm displacement in Drosophila subobscura. Genetica 57: 29–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Markow TA (1982) Mating systems of cactophilic Drosophila In: Barker JSF and Starmer WT (eds) Ecological Genetics and Evolution: The Cactus-YeastDrosophila Model System Academic Press pp 273–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markow TA (1985) A comparative investigation of the mating system of Drosophila hydei. Anim Behav 33: 775–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monclús M and Prevosti A (1971) The relationship between mating speed and wing length in Drosophila subobscura. Evolution 25: 214–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge L and Farquhar M (1983) Lifetime mating success of males fruitffies (Drosophila melanogaster) is related to their size. Anim Behav 31: 871–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge L, Hoffman A and Jones JS (1987) Male size and mating success in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura under field conditions. Anim Behav 35: 468–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prevosti A (1960) Cambios en la heterocigosis por inversion cromosomica al variar por selección la longitud del ala en Drosophila subobscura. Genét Ibér 12: 27–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Prevosti A (1966) Inversion heterozygosity and size in a natural population of Drosophila subobscura pp 49–54. Symposium on the Mutational Process: Mutation in Population Prague August 9–11 1965

    Google Scholar 

  • Prevosti A (1967) Inversion heterozygosity and selection for wing length in Drosophila subobscura. Gent Res Camb 10: 81–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pruzan A (1976) Effects of age, rearing and mating experiences on frequency dependent sexual selection in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 30: 130–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson A (1955) Selection in animals: synthesis. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 20: 225–229

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz A, Fontdevila A, Santos M, Seoane M and Torroja E (1986) The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. VIII. Evidence for endocyclic selection acting on the inversion polymorphism in a natural population. Evolution 40: 740–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz A, Fontdevila A and Wasserman M (1982) The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. III. Cytogenetic relationships between two sibling species of the buzzatii cluster. Genetics 101: 503–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz A, Naveira H and Fontdevila A (1984) La historia evolutiva de Drosophila buzzatii. IV. Aspectos citogenéticos de su polimorfismo cromosomico. Genét Ibér 36: 13–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos M, Ruiz A, Barbadilla A, Quezada-Diaz JE, Hasson E and Fontdevila A (1988) The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XIV. Larger flies mate more often in nature. Heredity 61: 255–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos M, Ruiz A and Fontdevila A (1989) The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XIII. Random differentiation as a partial explanation of the observed chromosomal variation in a structured natural population. Amer Natur 133: 183–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos M, Tarrio R, Zapata C and Alvarez G (1986) Sexual selection on chromosomal polymorphism in Drosophila subobscura. Heredity 57: 161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR and Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd ed WH Freeman New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperlich D and Pfriem P (1986) Chromosomal polymorphism in natural and experimen-tal populations pp 257–309. In: Ashburner M, Carson HL and Thompson Jr JN (eds). The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila Vol 3e Academic Press London

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiess EB (1977) Genes in Populations. John Wiley amp; Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalker HD (1980) Chromosome studies in wild populations of Drosophila melanogaster. IL Relationship of inversion frequencies to latitude, season, wing-loading and flight activity. Genetics 95: 211–223

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ (1985) Chance can produce a sex difference in variance in mating success and account for Bateman’s data Anim Behav 34: 1349–1352

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ (1987) Measures of sexual selection. Oxf Sury Evol Biol 2: 90–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor CE and Heide (1988) Sexual selection in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 42: 197–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R and Alcock J (1983) The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Harvard Univ Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington CH (1965) Introduction to the Symposium pp 1–6. In Baker HG and Stebbins GL (eds). The Genetics of Colonizing Species. Academic Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade MJ (1979) Sexual selection and variance in reproductive success. Amer Natur 114: 742–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade MJ and Arnold SJ (1980) The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behavior, female choice, and sperm precedence. Anim Behav 28: 446–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White MJD and Andrew LE (1960) Cytogenetics of the grasshopper Moraba scurra. V. Biometric effects of chromosomal inversions. Evolution 14: 284–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White MJD and Andrew LE (1962) Effects of chromosomal inversions on size and relative viability in the grasshopper Moraba scurra pp 94–101. In: Leeper GW (ed) The Evolution of Living Organisms Melbourne Univ Press

    Google Scholar 

  • White MJD, Lewontin RC and Andrew LE (1963) Cytogenetics of the grasshopper Moraba scurra. VII. Geographic variation of adaptive properties of inversions. Evolution 17: 147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ruiz, A., Santos, M. (1989). Mating Probability, Body Size, and Inversion Polymorphism in a Colonizing Population of Drosophila buzzatii . In: Fontdevila, A. (eds) Evolutionary Biology of Transient Unstable Populations. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74525-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74525-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-74527-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-74525-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics