Skip to main content

Das Verhalten der Epiphysenfuge bei verschiedenen Distraktionsmethoden

  • Conference paper
Book cover Fixateur externe — Fixateur interne

Zusammenfassung

Heute wird die transphyseale Distraktion zur Korrektur von Beinlängendifferenzen im Wachstumsalter häufig angewandt. Die Methode ist von besonderem Wert bei der Korrektur von Beinlängendifferenzen, die zusammen mit Deformitäten nahe der Epiphyse auftreten [1]. Das Hauptinteresse der Methode gilt dem Einfluß der Distraktion auf das spätere Wachstum der distrahierten Epiphyse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Canadell J, de Pablos J (1985) Breaking bony bridges by physeal distraction: a new approach. Int Orthop 9:223.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Crawford EJP, Jones CB, Dewar ME, Aichroth PM (1987) Distraction forces in children undergoing epiphyseal leg lengthening. Orthop Trans 11:302.

    Google Scholar 

  3. de Bastiani G, Aldegheri R, Renzi Brivo L, Trivella G (1986) Limb lengthening by distraction of the epiphyseal plate. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 68:545.

    Google Scholar 

  4. de Bastiani G, Aldegheri R, Renzi Brivo L, Trivella G (1986) Chondrodiatasis — controlled symmetrical distraction of the epiphyseal plate. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 68:550.

    Google Scholar 

  5. de Pablos J, Villas C, Canadell J (1986) Bone lengthening by physial distraction: an experimental study. Int Orthop 10:163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fishbone BM, Riley LH (1978) Continuous transphyseal distraction: experimental observations. Clin Orthop 136:120.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hert J (1969) Acceleration of the growth after decrease of load on epiphyseal plates by means of spring distractors. Folio Morphol 17:194.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Letts RM, Meadows L (1978) Epiphysiolysis as a method of limb lengthening. Clin Orthop 133: 230.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Monticelli G, Spinelli R (1981) Distraction epiphysiolysis as a method of limb lengthening. Clin Orthop 154:254.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Peltonen J, Alitalo I, Karaharju E, Helio H (1984) Distraction of the growth plate: experiments in pigs and sheep. Acta Orthop Scand 55:359.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Porter RW (1978) The effect of tension across a growing epiphysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 60:252.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ring PA (1958) Experimental bone lengthening by epiphyseal distraction. Br J Surg 46:169.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sledge CB, Noble J (1978) Experimental limb lengthening by epiphyseal distraction. Clin Orthop 136:111.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith WS, Cunningham JB (1957) The effect of alternating distracting forces on the epiphyseal plates of calves; a preliminary report. Clin Orthop 10:125.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Spriggins AJ, Woods C, Kenwright J (1987) Effects of distraction loads on the growth plate of the tibia: an experimental study. Trans Orthop Res Soc 12:492.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kenwright, J., Cunningham, J.L. (1989). Das Verhalten der Epiphysenfuge bei verschiedenen Distraktionsmethoden. In: Stuhler, T. (eds) Fixateur externe — Fixateur interne. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74516-4_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74516-4_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-74517-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-74516-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics