Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advanced Series in Agricultural Sciences ((AGRICULTURAL,volume 18))

Abstract

Applications of mixed model methods in the analysis of designed experiments are illustrated and discussed for purposes of: (1) increasing rate of selection response to create genetically diverse lines rapidly or to demonstrate feasibility of selection, (2) estimation of genetic parameters free of bias from selection and inbreeding, (3) estimation of response to selection with or without controls, and (4) verification of experimental design prior to the experiment. For traits controlled by a large number of additive loci, use of the numerator relationship matrix in the mixed model equations accounts for changes in additive genetic variance due to inbreeding, assortative mating and gametic disequilibrium resulting from selection. If the number of loci is small, non-normality of the genotypic distribution and changes in variance due to gene frequency changes (including fixation) are not accounted for but these seem to be of small consequence, at least for short-term selection. Use of mixed model methods do not require prior knowledge of base population heritability which can be estimated from the data unaltered by selection. If dominance effects are important, properties of the dominance relationship matrix and use of mixed model methods are not yet well understood in inbred and selected populations. Simulation results indicate that use of mixed model methods can be effective in randomly mated populations, even if the number of loci is small. There is evidence of bias in selected populations, however, particularly when gene frequencies are extreme. Properties of mixed model methods under dominance and other non-additive genetic models need more study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Avalos E, Smith C (1987) Genetic improvement of litter size in pigs. Anim Prod 44:153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belonsky GM (1984) Genetic evaluation of a swine herd under selection. MSc Thesis, Univ Guelph, Guelph

    Google Scholar 

  • Belonsky GM, Kennedy BW (1984) Within-herd genetic evaluation of swine. J Anim Sci 59 suppl(Abstr) 1:164

    Google Scholar 

  • Belonsky GM, Kennedy BW (1988) Selection on individual phenotype and best linear unbiased prediction of breeding value in a closed swine herd. J Anim Sci 66:1124– 1131

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bichard M, David PJ (1985) Effectiveness of genetic selection for prolificacy in pigs. J Reprod Fert suppl 33:127–138

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blair HT, Pollak EJ (1984) Estimation of genetic trend in a selected population with and without the use of a control population. J Anim Sci 58:878–886

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer MG (1971) The effect of selection on genetic variability. Am Nat 105:201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer MG (1980) The mathematical theory of quantitative genetics. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockerham CC (1954) An extension of the concept of partitioning hereditary variance for analysis of covariances among relatives when epistasis is present. Genetics 39:859– 882

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics. 2nd edn Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein J (1965) The effect of linkage on directional selection. Genetics 42:349–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianola D, Foulley JL, Fernando RL (1986) Prediction of breeding values when variances are not known. In: Dickerson GE, Johnson RK (eds) Proc 3rd World Congr Genet Appl Livest Prod. Agric Commun, Univ Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska XII:356–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson CR (1949) Estimation of changes in herd environment. J Dairy Sci (Abstr) 32:706

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson CR (1953) Estimation of variance and covariance components. Biometrics 9:226– 252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson CR (1963) Selection index and expected genetic advance. In: Statistical genetics and plant breeding. NAS-NRC 982, Washington DC pp 141–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson CR (1973) Sire evaluation and genetic trends. In: Proc Anim Breed Genet Symp in Honor of Dr. J.L. Lush. ASAS and ADSA, Champaign, Illinois pp 10–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson CR (1975) Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 31:423–447

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson CR (1976) A simple method for computing the inverse of a numerator relationship matrix used in prediction of breeding values. Biometrics 32:69–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson CR (1977) Prediction of merits of a single cross. Theor Appl Genet 49:273–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson CR (1984) Applications of linear models in animal breeding. Univ Guelph Press, Guelph

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson CR (1985a) Best linear unbiased prediction of nonadditive genetic merits in noninbred populations. J Anim Sci 60:111–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson CR (1985b) MIVQUE and REML estimation of additive and nonadditive genetic variances. J Anim Sci 61:113–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson CR, Kempthorne O, Searle SR, von Krosigk CM (1959) The estimation of environmental and genetic trends from records subject to culling. Biometrics 15:192– 218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill WG (1970) Design of experiments to estimate heritability by the regression of offspring on selected parents. Biometrics 26:566–571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill WG (1971) Design and efficiency of selection experiments for estimating genetic parameters. Biometrics 27:293–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill WG (1972) Estimation of genetic change. I. General theory and design of control populations. Anim Breed Abstr 40:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill WG, Nicholas FW (1974) Estimation of heritability by both regression of offspring on parent and intra-class correlation of sibs in one experiment. Biometrics 30:447–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hough JD, Benyshek LL (1986) Estimates of genetic trend using the reduced animal model versus least-squares using a control population. J Anim Sci 63 suppl (Abstr) 1:178

    Google Scholar 

  • Kackar RN, Harville DA (1981) Unbiasedness of two-stage estimation and prediction procedures for mixed linear models. Commun Stat Theor Meth A10:1249–1261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp RA (1985) The effects of positive assortative mating and preferential treatment of progeny on the estimation of breeding values. PhD Thesis, Univ Guelph,

    Google Scholar 

  • Guelph Legault C (1985) Selection of breeds, strains and individual pigs for prolificacy. J Reprod Fertsuppl 33:151–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Maki-Tanila A, Kennedy BW (1986) Mixed model methodology under genetic models with a small number of additive and non-additive loci. In: Dickerson GE, Johnson RK (eds) Proc 3rd World Congr Genet Appl Livest Prod. Agric Commun, Univ Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska XII:443–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson HD, Thompson R (1971) Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58:545–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson K (1903) Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. XI. On the influence of natural selection on the variability and correlation of organs. Phil Trans R Soc London A 200:1–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quaas RL, Pollak EJ (1980) Mixed model methodology for farm and ranch beef cattle testing programs. J Anim Sci 51:1277–1287

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao CR (1971) Minimum variance quadratic unbiased estimation of variance components. J Mult Anal 1:445–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson A (1977) The effect of selection on the estimation of genetic parameters. Z Tierz Züchtungsbiol 94:131–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer LR (1986) Pseudo-expectation approach to variance component estimation. J Dairy Sci 69:2884–2889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith C (1977) Use of stored frozen semen and embryos to measure genetic trends in farm livestock. Z Tierz Züchtungsbiol 94:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SP (1984) Dominance relationship matrix and inverse for an inbred population. Unpublished mimeo, Department of Dairy Science, Ohio State Univ, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith SP, Allaire FR (1985) Efficient selection rules to increase non-linear merit: application in mate selection. Genet Sel Evol 17:387–406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen DA, Kennedy BW (1982) Estimation of genetic variances in control and selected populations. In: Proc 2nd World Congr Genet Appl Livest Prod. Garsi, Madrid VÏ€:220–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen DA, Kennedy BW (1983) The use of the relationship matrix to account for genetic drift variance in the analysis of genetic experiments. Theor Appl Genet 66:217–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen DA, Kennedy BW (1984a) Estimation of response to selection using least-squares and mixed model methodology. J Anim Sci 58:1097–1106

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen DA, Kennedy BW (1984b) Estimation of genetic variances from unselected and selected populations. J Anim Sci 59:1213–1223

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen DA, Kennedy BW (1986) Analysis of selection experiments using mixed model methodology. J Anim Sci 68:245–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Styan GPH (1973) Hadamard products and multivariate statistical analysis. Linear Algebra and Its Applications 6:217–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson R (1976) Designs of experiments to estimate heritability when observations are available on parents and offspring. Biometrics 32:283–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson R (1977) The estimation of heritability with unbalanced data. II. Data available on more than two generations. Biometrics 33:497–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson R, Cameron ND (1986) Estimation of genetic parameters. In: Dickerson GE, Johnson RK (eds) Proc 3rd World Congr Genet Appl Livest Prod. Agric Commun, Univ Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska XII:371–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1922) Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Am Nat 56:330–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kennedy, B.W. (1990). Use of Mixed Model Methodology in Analysis of Designed Experiments. In: Gianola, D., Hammond, K. (eds) Advances in Statistical Methods for Genetic Improvement of Livestock. Advanced Series in Agricultural Sciences, vol 18. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74487-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74487-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-74489-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-74487-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics