X-Ray Microanalysis of Cryosections Using Image Analysis

  • Albert J. Saubermann
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Biophysics book series (BIOPHYSICS, volume 4)

Abstract

It is possible for electron probe x-ray microanalysis to be used to generate quantitative digital images of elemental distribution in cryosections of biological specimens (Gorlen et al. 1984, Ingram et al. 1987, Saubermann and Heyman 1987, Fiori et al. 1988, Johnson et al. 1988). By combining low temperature specimen preparation methods with computerized electron beam placement, an elemental map can be produced which gives information in a readily interpretable and understandable manner. By using well established electron probe x-ray analytical algorithms for quantitation of x-ray signals obtained through energy dispersive systems, each pixel can yield valuable quantitative information. When many pixels are combined, the statistical power of this form of analysis can be appreciated. However, and perhaps even more importantly, when grey level values are assigned to a range of pixel values in forming a map, it is possible for the eye and brain to do the statistical processing in an intuitive fashion. Since information on several elements can be acquired simultaneously, it is also possible to superimpose, and, thereby, relate elemental concentrations to each other as well as to anatomic structure. When quantitated, elemental mass is related to wet weight mass, as well as to dry weight mass. By using frozen hydrated cryosectioning techniques and analysis methods, special elemental relationships often become apparent (Saubermann and Stockton 1988, Saubermann and Heyman 1987). However, direct x-ray imaging of frozen hydrated tissue sections presents a formidable list of problems. Among these problems are 1) low peak to background ratios of biological elements normally found in small wet weight concentrations; 2) indistinguishable morphology due to the lack of contrast making it very difficult, if not impossible, to identify an area to be mapped; and 3) a specimen which is highly radiation sensitive such that water loss occurs at probe currents necessary to permit statistically acceptable x-ray generation rates. The methods which we have developed, use an algorithm which basically circumvents these major problems. Because changes in dry weight mass fraction of elements may not reflect changes in wet weight mas fractions (since cell water content can change for various physiological and pathological reasons), it may be important to determine and appreciate both wet weight and dry weight mass fractions in a biological specimen (Saubermann and Stockton, 1988).

Keywords

Hydrated Chrome Shrinkage Nylon Beryllium 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fiori C, Leapman R, Swyt C, Andrews B (1988) Quantitative x-ray mapping of biological cryosections. Ultramicroscopy 24:237–250.Google Scholar
  2. Gorlen K, Barden L, Del Priore J, Fiori C, Gibson C, Leapman R (1984) Computerized analytical electron microscope for elemental imaging. Rev. Sci. Iustrum. 55:912–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hall T, Anderson H, Appleton T (1973) The use of thin specimens for x-ray microanalysis in biology. J. Microscop. 99:177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hall T, Gupta B (1982) Quantification for the x-ray microanalysis of cryosections. J. Microscop. 126:333–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ingram F, Ingram M (1984) Influences of freeze-drying and plastic-embedding on electrolyte distributions. In: The Science of Biological Specimen Preparation. J. P. Revel, T. Barnard, & B. Haggis, eds. SEM Inc., AMF O’Hare, Il. pp 167–174.Google Scholar
  6. Ingram P, LeFurgey A, Davilla S, Lamvik M, Kopf D, Mandel L, Lieberman M (1987) Real-time quantitative elemental analysis and imaging in cells. Analytical Electron Microscopy-1987. D. Joy, ed. San Francisco Press. S.F. Calif. Proceedings MAS meeting. pp 179–183.Google Scholar
  7. Johnson D, Izutsu K, Cantino M, Wong J (1988) High spatial resolution spectroscopy in the elemental microanalyis and imaging of biological systems. Ultramicroscopy 24:221–236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. LoPachin R, Lowery J, Eichberg J, Kirkpatrick J, Cartwright J, Saubermann A (1988) Distribution of elements in rat peripheral axons and nerve cell bodies determined by x-ray microprobe analysis. J. Neurochem. 51:764–775.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Saubermann A, Beeuwkes R, Peters P (1981) Application of scanning electtron microscopy to x-ray analysis of frozen-hydrated sections. II. Analysis of standard solutions and artificial electrolyte gradients. J. Cell Biol. 88:269–273.Google Scholar
  10. Saubermann A, Echlin P, Peters P, Beeuwkes R (1981) Application of scanning electron microscopy to x-ray analysis of frozen-hydrated sections. I. Specimen handling techniques. J. Cell Biol. 88:257–267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Saubermann A, Heyman R (1987) Quantitative digital x-ray imaging using frozen hydrated and frozen dried tissue sections. J. Microscop. 146: 162–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Saubermann A, Scheid V (1985) Elemental composition and water content of neuron and glial cells in the central nervous system of the North American medicinal leech (Macrobdella decora). J. Neurochem. 44:825–834.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Saubermann A, Stockton. J (1988) Effects of increased extracellular K In the elemental composition and water content of neuron and glial cells in leech central nervous system. J. Neurochem 51:1797–1807.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Statham P (1987): Quantitative digital mapping with drift compensation. Analytical Electron Microscopy-1987. D. Joy ed. San Francisco Press, S.F. Calif Proceedings MAS Meeting. pp 187–190.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Albert J. Saubermann
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Anesthesiology Health Sciences CenterState Univ. of New York at Stony BrookStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations