Advertisement

Transformation in Potato

  • M. Yamamoto
Part of the Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry book series (AGRICULTURE, volume 9)

Abstract

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is an important world food crop. It is produced in 130 countries where three quarters of the world’s population live. It is grown as a major source of food in most countries with a temperate climate. World production of potatoes is 254 861 000 metric tons (United Nations 1982). Until recently, most world potato production was in Europe, but it has now increased most rapidly in Far Eastern countries, such as China, India, and Indonesia. China alone produces 56 million tons of potatoes, Indonesia 9 million tons, and Turkey 3 million tons. At present, potato consumption in developing countries is doubling every 10 to 15 years (International Potato Center, CIP 1984, United Nations 1982).

Keywords

Phenylalanine Ammonia Lyase Susceptible Cultivar Phytophthora Infestans Irish Cobbler Potato Leave 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin SM, Baur M, Ehlenfeld M, Kamierzak PJ, Helgesson H (1985) Intra-specific fusion in Solanum tuberosum. Theor Appl Genet 71: 172–175Google Scholar
  2. Bajaj YPS (ed) (1987a) Biotechnology and 21st century potato. In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry 3. Potato. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, pp 3–22Google Scholar
  3. Bajaj YPS (1987b) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry 3. Potato. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York TokyoGoogle Scholar
  4. Ball SG (1987) Molecular genetics of potato. In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry 3. Potato. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo pp 155 —173Google Scholar
  5. Bills DD (1977) Interactions between Phytophthora infestans and potato host. Am Chem Soc Symp 26:47 — 60Google Scholar
  6. Burrell MM, Twell D, Karp A, Ooms G (1985) Expression of shoot-inducing Ti-TL-DNA in differenti-ated tissues of potato (Solanum tuberosum cv. Maris Bard). Plant Mol Biol 5 (4): 213–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis JW, Ornstein L (1964) Disc electrophoresis II. Method and application to human protein. Ann NY Acad Sci 121: 404–427Google Scholar
  8. Doke N, Tomiyama K (1980) Suppression of the hypersensitive response of potato tuber protoplasts to hyphal wall components by water-soluble glucans isolated from Phytophthora infestons. Physiol Plant Pathol 16:177 —186Google Scholar
  9. Eckes P, Schell J, Willmitzer L (1985) Organic specific expression of three leaf/stem specific cDNA’s from potato is regulated by light and correlated with plastid development. Mol Gen Genet 199: 216–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Facciotti D, O’Neal JK, Lee S, Shoemaker CK (1985) Light inducible expression of a chimeric gene in soybean tissue transformed with Agrobacterium. Biotechnology 3:241 — 246Google Scholar
  11. Flor HH (1971) Current status of the gene-for-gene concept. Annu Rev Phytopathol 9: 275–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fluhr RC, Kluhenneier C, Nagy F, Chua Nam-Hai (1986) Organospecific and light induced expression of plant genes. Science 232: 1106–1112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fraley RT, Horsch RB (1986) Genetic transformation in higher plants. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 4: 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garas N, Kue J (1981) Potato lectin lyses zoopores of Phytophthora infestans and precipitates elicitors of terpenoid accumulation produced by the fungus. Physiol Plant Pathol 18: 227–237Google Scholar
  15. Hall BD, Spiegelman S (1961) Sequence complementarity of T2 specific RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 47: 137–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harris PW (1978) The potato crop. The scientific bases for improvement. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Hawkes JG (1978) History of potato. In: Harris PW (ed) The potato crop. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  18. International Potato Center (CIP) (1984) Potatoes for the developing world. Lima, Peru, CIP, pp 1–148Google Scholar
  19. Japan Agriculture Yearbook (1987) Japan Agriculture Yearbook Association, Tokyo, pp 288–291Google Scholar
  20. Jaynes JM, Espinoza NO, Dodds JH (1986) Genetic engineering of potato, p 153. Abstr Int Congr Plant tissue and cell culture. Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, Aug 3–8, 1986Google Scholar
  21. Kato T (1986) Potato breeding by cell fusion. Potato Sci 6: 80–81Google Scholar
  22. Kolodner R, Tewari KK (1975) The molecular size and conformation of the chloroplast DNA from higher plants. Biochim Biophys Acta 402: 372–390PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kué J, Henfling J, Garas N, Doke N (1979) Control of terpenoid metabolism in the potato-Phytophthora infestans interaction. J Food Bot 42: 508–511Google Scholar
  24. Large EC (1940) The advance of the fungi. Holt, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Lowry OH, Rosenbrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ (1951) Protein measurements with the Folin phenol reagents. J Biol Chem 193: 265–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Melchers G, Sacristan MD, Holder AA (1978) Somatic hybrid plants of tomato regenerated from fused protoplast. Carlsberg Res Commun 43: 203–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nomura K, Komamine A (1986) A cell technological approach to somatic embryogenesis from single cells of carrot. VI Int Congr Plant tissue and cell culture. Univ Minnesota Minneapolis Abstr Aug. 3–8, 1986, p 344Google Scholar
  28. Nelson RS, Cressen GP, Bright WJ (1983) Plant regeneration from protoplast of Solanum brevidens. Plant Sci Lett 30: 355–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nozu M, Yamamoto M, Konno K (1976) Occurrence of resistant reaction by exogenous DNA fraction on potato leaves infected with Phytophthora infestans. Bull Fac Agric Shimane Univ 10: 80–85Google Scholar
  30. Nozu M, Yamamoto M, Ofune S, Nishimura A, Bando T (1977) Pathophysiological studies on potato late blight, with special reference to the induction of resistant reaction by the application of DNA fraction from the interspecific hybrid. Bull Fac Agric Shimane Univ 11: 28–33Google Scholar
  31. Ooms G, Lenton LR (1985) T-DNA genes to study plant development: precosious tuberisation and enhanced cytokinins in A. tumefaciens-transformed potato. Plant Mol Biol 5: 205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ooms G, Karp A, Burrell MM, Twell D, Roberts J (1985) Genetic modification of potato development using RI T-DNA. Theor Appl Genet 70 (4): 440–446Google Scholar
  33. Ooms G, Bossen ME, Burrell MM, Karp A (1986) Genetic manipulation in potato with Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Potato Res 29 (3): 367–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Potrykus I, Hoffmann P (1973) Transplantation of nuclei into protoplasts of higher plants. Z Pflanzenphysiol 70:364 — 366Google Scholar
  35. Ramulu KS, Dijkhuis P, Roest S (1983) Phenotypic variation and ploidy level of plants regenerated from protoplasts of tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Bintje ). Theor Appl Genet 66: 329–338Google Scholar
  36. Rich AV (1983) Potato diseases. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–238Google Scholar
  37. Scot JD (1976) Praise the potato! Reader’s Digest, Dec 1976, pp 205–212Google Scholar
  38. Shahin EA, Simpson RB (1986) Gene transfer system for potato. Hort Sci 21: 1199–1201Google Scholar
  39. Shahin EA, Simpson RB (1986) Introduction and expression of foreign gene in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), p 152. Abstr VI Int Congr Plant tissue and cell culture. Univ Minnesota, Minneapo-lis, Aug 3 — 8, 1986Google Scholar
  40. Shigematsu A, Mizusawa Y, Hirai T (1966) Incorporation of two radioactive amino acids into the nu-cleic acid fractions in tobacco leaves infected with Tobacco Mosaic Virus. Virology 28: 331–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stahmann MA, Staples RC (1964) Changes in protein and several enzymes susceptible bean leaves af-ter infection by the bean rust fungus. Phytopathology 54: 760–764Google Scholar
  42. Sukhepind K, Spivey R, Simpson RB, Shahin SA (1987) Transgenic tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) transformed with a binary vector in Agrobacterium rhizogenes: non-chimeric origin of callus clone and low copy numbers of integrated vector T-DNA. Mol Gen Genet 206 (3): 491–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tabeke I, Otsuki Y (1969) Infection of tobacco mesophyll protoplasts by tobacco mosaic virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 64:843— 849Google Scholar
  44. Thanutong PI, Furusawa I, Yamamoto M (1983) Resistant tobacco plants from protoplast-derived calluses selected for their resistance to Pseudomonas and Alternaria toxins. Theor Appl Genet 66: 209–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thomas CA Jr, Abelson J (1966) The isolation and characterization of DNA from bacteriophage. Nucleic Acid Res. Harper & Row, New York London, pp 553–561Google Scholar
  46. Tomiyama K, Ishizaka N, Sato N, Masamune T, Katsui N (1968) “Rishitin”. A phytoalexin-like substance. Its role in the defense reaction of potato tubers to infection. Biochemical regulation in diseased plants or injury. Japan Phytopathological Society, Tokyo, pp 289–295Google Scholar
  47. Tomiyama K, Sakuma T, Ishizaka N, Sato N, Katsui N, Takasugi N, Masamune R (1968 ) A new antifungal substance isolated from resistant potato tuber tissue infected by pathogen. Phytopathology 58: 115–116Google Scholar
  48. Tomiyama K, Doke N, Lee HS (1976) Mechanism of hypersensitive cell death in host-parasite interaction. In: Tomiyama K, Daly JM, Uritani I, Oku H, Ouchi S (eds) Biochemistry and cytology of host-parasite interaction. Kodansha and Elsevier, Tokyo Amsterdam, pp 136–142Google Scholar
  49. Trulson AJ, Simpson RB, Shahin EA (1986) Transformation of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) plants with Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Theor Appl Genet 73 (1): 11–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Uchimiya H, Chen K, Wildman SG (1979) A microelectro-focussing method for determining the large and small composition of fraction I protein. Plant Sci Lett 14: 377–394Google Scholar
  51. United Nations (1982) Statistical Yearbook. United Nations, pp 516–517Google Scholar
  52. Western JH (1971) Diseases of Crop Plants. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Wood KR, Barbara DJ (1971) Specificity of rishitin and phytuberin accumulation by potato. Phytopathology 61: 969–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wood KR, Barbara DJ (1971) Virus multiplication and peroxidase activity in leaves of cucumber mosaic virus. Physiol Plant Pathol 1: 73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yamamoto M (1968) Hypersensitivity of potatoes to the invasion of Phytophthora infestans. In: Hirai T, Hidaka Z, Uritani I (eds) Biochemical Regulation in Diseased Plants or Injury. Phytopath Soc Jpn, Tokyo, pp 335–342Google Scholar
  56. Yamamoto M (1970) On the peroxidase activity of potato leaves infected with Phytophthora infestans. Bull Fac Agric Shimane Univ 4: 14–18Google Scholar
  57. Yamamoto M (1974) Potato late blight, with special reference of potatoes to the invasion of Phytophthora infestans. Rev Plant Prot Res 7: 45–56Google Scholar
  58. Yamamoto M (1982) Recent approach to studies of potato late blight, with special reference to the nature of resistance of potatoes to the invasion of Phytophthora infestans. Forsch a d Geb Pflkr 9(1):1 — 37Google Scholar
  59. Yamamoto M (1983) Induction of resistance of potatoes to Phytophthora infestans by exogenous potato DNA, with special reference to the incorporation of rubbed DNA into potato tissues. Ann Phytopathol Soc Jpn 49: 331–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yamamoto M (1985) Studies on Potato Late Blight. Report on the Fundamental Scientific Research. General Research (C) Ministry of Education and Culture, No. 59560044. Lab Plant Path Coll Agric Kyoto Univ (in Japanese), pp 1–111Google Scholar
  61. Yamamoto M (1986) Restriction enzyme treatment of DNA from potato hybrid resistant to Phytophthora infestans and appearance of flecks on susceptible potato cultivar (in Japanese). KinkiChugoku Agric Res 71: 16–18Google Scholar
  62. Yamamoto M (1986) Incorporation of DNA from potato hybrid resistant to Phytophthora infestans on susceptible variety leaves placing with or without carborandum and adsorbent cotton swab (in Japanese). Kinki-Chugoku Agric Res 72: 9–11Google Scholar
  63. Yamamoto M, Hatta S (1974) Studies on the compatibility of potato varieties and races of Phytophthora infestans ( Mont.) DeBary, with special reference to the DNA fraction of the suscept and pathogen. Bull Fac Agric Shimane Univ 8: 28–40Google Scholar
  64. Yamamoto M, Kitami K (1971) Observation on the invasion of Phytophthora infestans to the cultured tissues of potatoes. Ann Phytopathol Soc Jpn 37: 58–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yamamoto M, Konno K (1976) Changes in soluble proteins in potato leaves infected with Phytophthora infestans. Plant Cell Physiol 17:843 —846Google Scholar
  66. Yamamoto M, Kuroiwa T (1986) Induction of hypersensitive response to a compatible race of Phytophthora infestans by pre-treatment of potato leaves with DNA extracted from a resistant cultivar. Ann Phytopathol Soc Jpn 52: 8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yamamoto M, Matsuo S (1976) Involvement of DNA in resistance of potatoes to invasion of Phytophthora infestans. Nature 259 (5538): 63–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yamamoto M, Nakao K (1976) Changes of protein, PAL and PO activities in potato leaves infected with Phytophthora infestans, with special reference to the DNA fraction of different varieties. In: Tomiyama K, Daly JM, Uritani I, Oku H, Ouchi S (eds) Biochemistry and Cytology of Plant-Parasite Interaction. Kodansha and Elsevier, Tokyo Amsterdam, pp 195–197Google Scholar
  69. Yamamoto M, Otsuka N (1971) Investigation of the DNA of potato leaves in relation to the resistance against the invasion of Phytophthora infestans. Ann Phytopathol Soc Jpn 37: 84–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yamamoto M, Nozu M, Shigematsu A (1969) Experiments on DNA containing fraction obtained from potatoes in relation to the hypersensitivity of resistant plant to the invasion of Phytophthora in-festans. Bull Fac Agric Shimane Univ 3: 1–5Google Scholar
  71. Yamamoto M, Otsuka N, Imamura K, Kitami K (1971) Effect of DNA from the resistant potatoes on the Phytophthora infectivity to the susceptible cultivar. Symp Cell Biol 22: 51–57Google Scholar
  72. Yamamoto M, Matsuo K, Konno K, Bando T (1975) On the DNA fraction from plants and hypersensitivity of potatoes to the invasion of Phytophthora infestans. Proc Symp Current Topics in Plant Pathology. Akademia Kiado, Budapest, Hungary, pp 53–56Google Scholar
  73. Yamamoto M, Matsuo K, Konno K (1979) Further evidence on activity of the DNA fraction from a resistant hybrid inducing localized flecks on Phytophthora infestans-infected potato plants. Bot Mag Tokyo 92: 139–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yamamoto M, Kuroiwa T, Nishibayashi S (1984) Further evidence for the uptake of exogenous DNA into potato leaf cells. Plant Cell Physiol 25: 665–670Google Scholar
  75. Yamaoka N, Furusawa I, Yamamoto M (1982) Infection of turnip protoplasts with cauliflower mosaic virus. Virology 122:503 — 505Google Scholar
  76. Zucker M (1963) Sequential induction of phenylalanine ammonia lyase and lyase inactivating system in potato disc. Plant Physiol 43: 363–374Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Yamamoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Plant Pathology, College of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyoto 606Japan

Personalised recommendations