Is Selenium Metabolism Necessary for Its Anticarcinogenic Activity?
At the Third International Selenium Symposium held in Beijing in 1984, I presented a talk entitled, “Susceptibility of Mammary Carcinogenesis in Response to Dietary Selenium Levels” (Ip 1987). Since the current lecture is going to discuss new developments from our laboratory in the past few years, including both published and unpublished data, a brief review and update of the Beijing presentation would be relevant to serve as background materials.
KeywordsGlutathione Selenium Methionine Anthracene GSSG
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Horvath PM, Ip C (1983) Synergistic effect of vitamin E and selenium in the chemoprevention of mammary carcinogenesis in rats. Cancer Res 43: 5335–5341Google Scholar
- Ip C (1981a) Factors influencing the anticarcinogenic efficacy of selenium in dimethylbenz(a)-anthracene-induced mammary tumorigenesis in rats. Cancer Res 41:2683–2686Google Scholar
- Ip C (1981b) Prophylaxis of mammary neoplasia by selenium supplementation in the initiation and promotion phases of chemical carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 41:4386–4390Google Scholar
- Ip C (1987) Susceptibility of mammary carcinogenesis in response to dietary selenium levels: modification by fat and vitamin intake. In: Combs GF Jr, Spallholz JE, Levander OA, Oldfield JE (eds) Selenium in biology and medicine. 3rd Int Symp, part B. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 1009–1022Google Scholar
- Ip C, White G (1987) Mammary cancer chemoprevention by inorganic and organic selenium: single agent treatment or in combination with vitamin E and their effects on in vitro immune functions. Carcinogenesis 8: 1763–1766Google Scholar
- Morrison DG, Medina D (1988) Intracellular 58K selenoprotein levels correlate with inhibition of DNA synthesis in MMEC lines. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 29: 19 (Abstr No 74)Google Scholar
- Obermeyer BD, Palmer IS, Olson 0E, Halverson AW (1971) Toxicity of trimethylselenonium chloride in the rat with and without arsenite. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 20: 135–146Google Scholar