Skip to main content

Nickel Bioavailability from Patch Tests: Comparison Between Nickel Sulphate and Nickel Chloride Using TRUE Test

  • Conference paper
Current Topics in Contact Dermatitis

Summary

The development of local allergic skin reactions in nickel-sensitive individuals was examined with the TRUE Test, using various application times and different test concentrations of nickel sulphate and nickel chloride. The positive reactions seen with standard nickel sulphate concentration in the TRUE Test were comparable with those seen with the Finn chamber method. For both tests 48-h occlusion was needed for the optimal result. Three times higher nickel sulphate concentrations did not improve the results. Nickel chloride in the new vehicle of the TRUE Test penetrated the skin more effectively to trigger the immune system, since positive results comparable to the above-mentioned nickel sulphate tests were seen already after 3–6 h patch application when the actual nickel concentrations were comparable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bruze M (1988) Patch testing with nickel sulphate under occlusion for 5 hours. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 68: 361–364.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fischer TI, Maibach HI (1985) The thin layer rapid use epicutaneous test (True test), a new patch test method with high accuracy. Br J Dermatol 112: 63–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fischer T, Rystedt I (1985) False-positive, follicular and irritant patch test reactions to metal salts. Contact Dermatitis 12: 93–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fullerton A, Andersen JR, Hoelgaard A, Menne T (1986) Permeation of nickel salts through human skin in vitro. Contact Dermatitis 15: 173–177.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fullerton A, Andersen JR, Hoelgaard A (1988) Permeation of nickel through human skin in vitro effect of vehicles. Br J Dermatol 118: 509–516.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalimo K, Lammintausta K (1984) 24 and 48 h allergen exposure in patch testing. Contact Dermatitis 10: 25–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalimo K, Lammintausta K, Maki J, Teuho J, Jansen CT (1985) Nickel penetration in allergic individuals: bioavailability versus X-ray microanalysis detection. Contact Dermatitis12: 255–257.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mendelow AY, Forsyth A, Florence T, Baille A (1985) Patch testing for nickel allergy. The influence of the vehicle on the response rate to topical nickel sulphate. Contact Dermatitis3: 29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wahlberg J (1980) Petrolatum — a realiable vehicle for metal allergens. Contact Dermatitis 6: 134–136.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kalimo, K., Lammintausta, K. (1989). Nickel Bioavailability from Patch Tests: Comparison Between Nickel Sulphate and Nickel Chloride Using TRUE Test. In: Frosch, P., Dooms-Goossens, A., Lachapelle, JM., Rycroft, R.J.G., Scheper, R.J. (eds) Current Topics in Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74299-6_106

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74299-6_106

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-74301-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-74299-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics