Skip to main content

Reproducibility of Patch Test Results: Comparison of TRUE Test and Finn Chamber Test

  • Conference paper
Current Topics in Contact Dermatitis

Summary

For evaluation of reproducibility duplicate patch test series comprising 12 allergens were applied to either side of the back in a total of 139 patients. The reproducibility of a newly developed patch test system, the TRUE Test, was compared with that of the Finn chamber test. In the TRUE Test 20 of 63 patients had at least one positive reaction, the total number of positive reactions being 28. Five of these 28 reactions (17.9%) were found on only one side of the back, i.e. they were nonreproducible. In the Finn chamber test 33 of 76 patients had at least one positive reaction, and 22 of 58 positive reactions (37.9%) were nonreproducible. The percentage of nonreproducible positive results was more than twice as high in the Finn chamber test as in the TRUE Test. However, due to the low number this difference in reproducibility between the two test systems was not statistically significant using the chi-square test (P = 0.1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bandmann HJ, Dohn W (1967) Die Epikutantestung. Bergmann, München.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Bandmann HJ, Agathos M (1981) Das ‘Angry Back Syndrome’. Untersuchungsergebnisse mit Sequenztestungen, Wiederholungstestungen und dem Cocarden-(Target-)Test. Hautarzt [Suppl V] 32:97–104.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bruynzeel DP (1983) Angry back or excited skin syndrome. Thesis. Kripps Repro Mettel, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bruynzeel DP, Maibach HI (1986) Excited skin syndrome (angry back). Arch Dermatol122: 323–328.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lachapelle JM, Bruynzeel DP, Ducombs G, Hannuksela M, Ring J, White IR, Wilkinson J, Fisher T, Billberg K (1988) European multicenter study of the TRUE test. Contact Dermatitis 19: 91–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fischer T, Maibach HI (1985) The thin layer rapid use epicutaneous test (TRUE-test), a new patch method with high accuracy. Br J Dermatol 112: 63–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fischer T, Maibach HI (1986) Patch testing in allergic contact dermatitis: an update. Sem Dermatol 5: 214–224.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gollhausen R, Przybilla B, Ring J (1987) Reproducibility of patch testing. Proceedings of the XVII Congressus Mundi Dermatologiae, 24–29 May, 1987. Volume of abstracts. University of Steglitz, Berlin, p 59.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hasan T, Jansen CT (1988) Reproducibility and dosaging in photocontact testing. (This volume).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kligman AM, Gollhausen R (1986) The “angry back”. A new concept or old confusion? Br J Dermatol [Suppl 31] 115: 93–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maibach HI, Fregert S, Magnusson B, Pirilä V, Hjorth N, Wilkinson D, Malten K, Meneghini C, Lachapelle JM, Calnan C, Cronin E (1982) Quantification of the excited skin syndrome (the ‘angry back’). Retesting one patch at a time. Contact Dermatitis 8: 78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Luderschmidt C, Heilgemeier G, RingJ, Burg G (1982) Polyvalente Kontaktallergie versus ‘Angry Back’: Zur Problematik falsch positiver Epikutantestreaktionen. Allergologie 5: 262–264.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mitchell JC (1977) Multiple concomitant positive patch test reactions. Contact Dermatitis 3: 315–320.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gollhausen, R., Przybilla, B., Ring, J. (1989). Reproducibility of Patch Test Results: Comparison of TRUE Test and Finn Chamber Test. In: Frosch, P., Dooms-Goossens, A., Lachapelle, JM., Rycroft, R.J.G., Scheper, R.J. (eds) Current Topics in Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74299-6_103

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74299-6_103

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-74301-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-74299-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics