Skip to main content

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, X-ray Computed Tomography, Electroencephalography, and Long-Term Outcome After Head Injury: A Prospective Reexamination of 55 Patients

  • Conference paper
Head Injuries

Part of the book series: Advances in Neurosurgery ((NEURO,volume 17))

  • 64 Accesses

Abstract

Some authors judge magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to be a more sensitive method than high resolution X-ray computed tomography (CT) for the assessment of brain pathology after head injury [1,4,5,10–15, 19–24,27,29,31,33–36]. Literature dealing with the artifacts and shortcomings of MRI remains an exception [9]. These publications lead to several questions: Which correlations exist between MRI and CT in the posttraumatic pathology of the brain? What kind of artifacts should one be acquainted with? Does a restitutio integrum after any posttraumatic coma still exist? And is the concept of “commotio” [3,18,25] of further use? Therefore, we reexamined some of our patients by a modified MRI technique [6].

Dedicated to the nurses and physiotherapists who have cared for them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander RC, Schor DP, Smith WL jr (1986) Magnetic resonance imaging of intracranial injuries from child abuse. J Pediatr 109: 975–979

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barnett GH, Ropper AH, Johnson KA (1988) Physiological support and monitoring of critically ill patients during magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 68: 246–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergmann EV (1880) Die Gehirnerschütterung. In: Bergmann EV (ed) Die Lehre von den Kopfverletzungen. Enke, Stuttgart, pp 295–315

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brant-Zawadzki M, Davis PL, Crooks LE, Mills CM, Norman D, Newton TH, Sheldon P, Kaufman L (1983) NMR demonstration of cerebral abnormalities: comparison with CT. AJNR 140: 847–854

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cabanis EA, Perez G, Tamraz JC, Iba-Zizen MT, Roger B, Alfonso JM, Rougemont D (1986) Cephalic magnetic resonance imaging of boxers. Acta Radiol (Stockh) Suppl 369: 365–366

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dewes W, Träber F, Gieseke J, Harder T (1987) Modifizierte T2-gewichtete Gradientenechosequenz für die MR-Tomographie des ZNS. Fortschr Röntgenstr 147: 337–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dewes W, Moskopp D, Solymosi L, Kurthen M, Harder T, Kersting G (1988) MR-tomography of traumatic changes of the CNS. (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Drayer B, Burger P, Darwin R, Riederer S, Herfkens R, Johnson GA (1986) MRI of brain iron. AJR 147: 103–110

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Firsching R, Heindel W, Ernestus RI, Frowein RA, Bunke J (1987) Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging artifacts: Report of three cases. J Neurosurg 67: 776–778

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gandy SE, Snow RB, Zimmerman RD, Deck MDF (1984) Cranial nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in head trauma. Ann Neurol 16: 254–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gomorri JM, Grossman RI, Goldberg HI, Zimmerman RA, Bilaniuk LT (1985) Intracranial hematomas: imaging by high-field MR. Radiology 157: 87–93

    Google Scholar 

  12. Groswasser Z, Reider-Groswasser I, Soroker N, Machtey Y (1987) Magnetic resonance imaging in head injured patients with normal late computed tomography series. Surg Neurol 27: 331–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hadley DM, Teasdale GM (1988) Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine. J Neurol 235: 193–206

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Han JS, Kaufman B, Alfidi RJ, Yeung HN, Benson JE, Haaga JR, El Yousef SJ, Clampitt ME, Bonstelle CT, Huss R (1984) Head trauma evaluated by magnetic resonance and computed tomography: a comparison. Radiology 150: 71–77

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jenkins A, Teasdale GM, Hadley MDM, MacPherson P, Rowan JO (1986) Brain lesions detected by magnetic resonance imaging in mild and severe head injuries. Lancet ii: 445–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jennett B, Bond M (1975) Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet i: 480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jennett B, Teasdale GM (1981) Assessment of outcome. In: Jennett B, Teasdale GM (eds) Management of head injuries. FA Davis Co, Philadelphia, pp 311–316

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jennett B, Teasdale GM (1981) Type of injury sustained as a basis for classification, and pathological substrate of altered consciousness after head injury. In: Jennett B, Teasdale GM (eds) Management of head injuries. FA Davis Co, Philadelphia, pp 13 & 91-93

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jordan BD (1987) Neurologic aspects of boxing. Arch Neurol 44: 453–459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kneeland JB, Cahill PT, Lee BCP, Peterson ME, Knowles RJR, Whalen JP (1985) Nuclear magnetic resonance: status of clinical application. Cornell Vet 75: 130–158

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Langfitt TW, Obrist WD, Alavi A, Grossman RI, Zimmerman R, Jaggi J, Uzzell B, Reivich M, Patton DR (1986) Computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography in the study of brain trauma: preliminary observations. J Neurosurg 64: 760–767

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Levine HS, Handel SF, Goldman AM, Eisenberg HM, Guinto FC (1985) Magnetic resonance imaging after ‘diffuse’ nonmissile head injury: a neurobehavioral study. Arch Neurol 42: 963–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Levine HS, Amparo E, Eisenberg HM, Williams DH, High WM, McArdle CB, Weiner R (1987) Magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography in relation to the neurobehavioral sequelae of mild and moderate head injuries. J Neurosurg 66: 706–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mawk JR (1986) Magnetic resonance scan of an encephalomalacic brain lesion due to concussive shrapnel wound. Military Medicine (Wash, DC) 151: 605–606

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Petit JL (1783) Des plaies de la tête. In: Petit JL (Ouvrage posthume) Traité des maladies chirurgicales, et des opérations qui leur conviennent. Tome I, Méquignon, Paris, pp 43–60 (p 471)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Plum F, Posner JB (1980) Prognosis in the vegetative state. In: Plum F, Posner JB (eds) The diagnosis of stupor and coma, 3/e. FA Davis Co, Philadelphia, pp 338–340

    Google Scholar 

  27. Raininko RK (1986) Low field magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the demonstration of posttraumatic brain abnormalities. Acta Radiol (Stockh) Suppl 369: 374–376

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rutledge JN, Hilal SK, Silver AJ, Defendini R, Fahn S (1987) Study of movement disorders and brain iron by MR. AJR 149: 365–379

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Snow RB, Zimmerman RD, Gandy SE, Deck MDF (1986) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the evaluation of head injury. Neurosurgery 18: 45–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Spatz H (1935) Anatomie des Mittelhirns. In: Bumke O, Foerster O (eds) Handbuch der Neurologie, Bd I, Springer, Berlin, pp 474–540 (for: Berliner Blau-Reaktion: pp 494-500)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stevens JM, Valentine AR (1987) Review article: magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgery. Br J Neurpsurg 1: 405–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wassmann H, Moskopp D, Reuter B, Linke DB, Dewes W, Solymosi L (1988) Verlaufsbeobachtung eines Patienten mit posttraumatischem apallischem Syndrom über zehn Jahre. Lecture T1/1, 39th Annual Meeting of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirugie, Köln, May 11

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wilberger JE, Deeb Z, Rothfus W (1987) Magnetic resonance imaging in cases of severe head injury. Neurosurgery 20: 571–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zimmerman RA, Bilaniuk LT, Grossman RI, Levine RS, Lynch R, Goldberg HI, Samuel L, Edelstein W, Bottomley P, Redington RW (1985) Resistive NMR of intracranial hematomas. Neuroradiology 27: 16–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zimmerman RA, Bilaniuk LT, Hackney DB, Goldberg HI, Grossman RI (1986) Head injury: early results of comparing CT and high-field MR. AJR 147: 1215–1222

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zimmerman RA, Bilaniuk LT, Hackney DB, Goldberg HI, Grossman RI (1986) Magnetic resonance imaging of traumatic sinus and mastoid bleeding. Acta Radiol (Stockh) Suppl 369: 367–369

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Moskopp, D., Dewes, W., Solymosi, L., Kurthen, M. (1989). Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, X-ray Computed Tomography, Electroencephalography, and Long-Term Outcome After Head Injury: A Prospective Reexamination of 55 Patients. In: Frowein, R.A., Brock, M., Klinger, M. (eds) Head Injuries. Advances in Neurosurgery, vol 17. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74279-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74279-8_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-50550-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-74279-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics