Systolic Pressure-Dimension Relationships and Diastolic Dimensions for Monitoring of Left Ventricular Function

  • H. Heinrich
Conference paper

Abstract

Left ventricular function is determined by preload, afterload, contractility, and heart rate. The best description of the interactions of these main determinants on left ventricular function is the pressure-volume diagram. However, in clinical practice, use of the pressure-volume diagram was, and still is, restricted to the catheter laboratory and to experimental conditions, the main problem for clinical use being the difficulty involved in determining the left ventricular volume.

Keywords

Catheter Glycerin Epinephrine Cardiol Fentanyl 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Frank O (1897) Die Wirkung von Digitalis (Helleborein) auf das Herz. Sitzungsberichte der Gesellschaft für Morphologie und Physiologie zu München H2:14–43.Google Scholar
  2. Glick G, Braunwald E (1965) Relative role of the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system in the reflex control of heart rate. Circ Res 16:363–375.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Heinrich H, Fösel TH, Fontaine L, Spilker D, Winter H, Ahnefeld FW(1987a) Assessement of contractility changes in humans by transesophageal echocardiography — the peaksystolic pressure end-systolic diameter relationship (PSPESDRS). Int J Clin Monit Comput 4:243–248.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Heinrich H, Fontaine L, Wilder-Smith O, Winter H, Ahnefeld FW (1987b) Usefulnes of the endsystolic quotient and of fractional shortening for assessment of contractility changes under different loading conditions. Anesthesiology 67 [Suppl]:A209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Heinrich H, Fontaine L, Winter H (1988) Ist die Bestimmung der systolischen Druck-Durchmesserbeziehung durch passagere Druckanhebung mit Methoxamin ohne autonome Blockade möglich? Anaesthesist 37 (Suppl):109.Google Scholar
  6. Jacob R, Weigand KH (1966) Die endsystolischen Druck-Volumenbeziehungen als Grundlage einer Beurteilung der Kontraktilität des linken Ventrikels in situ Pflügers Arch 289:37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kass DA, Yamazaki T, Burkhoff D, Maughan WL, Sagawa K (1986) Determination of left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relationships by the conductance (volume) catheter technique. Circulation 73:586–595.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kissling G, Takeda N, Vogt M (1985) Left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relationships as a measure of ventricular performance. Basic Res Cardiol 80:594–607.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Koch-Weser J, Blinks JR (1963) The influence of the interval between beats on myocardial contractility. Pharmacol Rev 15:601–652.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sagawa K (1984) End-systolic pressure-volume relationship in retrospect and prospect Fed Proc 43(9):2399–2401.Google Scholar
  11. Suga H, Sagawa K, Shoukas AA (1973) Load independence of the instantaneous pressurevolume ratio of the canine left ventricle and effects of epinephrine and heart rate on the ratio. Circ Res 32:314–322.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Warner HR, Cox A (1962) A mathematical model of heart rate control by sympathetic and vagus efferent information. J Appl Physiol 17:349–355.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Heinrich

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations