Skip to main content

Value and Limitations of Transesophageal Echocardiography in Mitral Valvular Prosthesis

  • Conference paper
Transesophageal Echocardiography

Abstract

Assessment of prosthetic valve function, a frequently encountered challenge to the clinician, is often confounded by superimposed cardiovascular problems such as ventricular dysfunction, multivalvular disease, and ischemic heart disease. Fluoroscopy, phonocardiography, and echocardiography have been tools used in the evaluation of normal and abnormal prosthetic valve function over the past several years [1–4]. The advent of Doppler echocardiography has given a big boost to noninvasive hemodynamic assessment of prosthetic valve function [5]. There are now available normal values for most prosthetic valves [6]. Increased gradients and prolonged half-times with decreasing valve areas are characteristically seen in prosthetic valve stenosis. This hemodynamic assessment is now possible noninvasively by transthoracic Doppler interrogation of the valve. Aortic prosthesis dysfunction due to regurgitation can be detected and semiquantitated both by pulsed/continuous wave Doppler and color flow imaging. The usefulness of transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography as well as Doppler and color flow imaging in assessment of mitral prosthetic function is limited due to attenuation and flow masking behind the nonbiologic material of the prosthesis [7, 8]. Detection of other potential complications such as mural thrombus in the atrium/atrial appendage, vegetations, and ring abscesses via the transthoracic route is limited due to acoustic shadowing by the prosthetic valve material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sands MK, Lachman AS, O’Reilly DJ, Leach CN, et al (1982) Diagnostic value of cinefluorscopy in the Evaluation of prosthetic heart valve dysfunction. Am Heart J 104:622–627.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kotier MN, Segal BL, Parry WR (1978) Echocardiographic and phonocardiographic evaluation of prosthetic heart valves. Cardiovasc Clin 9:187–207.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cunha CL, Giulliani ER, Callahan JA, Pluth J (1980) Echophonocardiographic findings in patients with prosthetic heart valve malfunction. Mayo clin Proc 55:231–242.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller FA, Tajik AJ, Seward JB, et al (1981) Prosthetic valve dysfunction: two-dimensional echocardiographic observations (abstract). Circulation 64(Suppl IV):315.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper DM, Stewart WJ, Shiavone WA, Lombardo HP, et al (1987) Evaluation of normal prosthetic valve function by Doppler echocardiography. Am Heart J 114:576–582.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reisner SA, Meltzer RS (1988) Normal values of prosthetic valve Doppler echocardiographic parameters: a review. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1:203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sprecher DL, Adamick R, Adams D, Kisslo J (1987) In vitro color flow, pulsed and continuous wave Doppler ultrasound masking of flow by prosthetic valves. J Am Coll cardiol9:1306–1310.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Come PC (1987) Pitfalls in the diagnosis of periprosthetic valvular regurgitation by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll cardiol 9:1176–1179.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Neuessen U, Schnittger I, Appleton C, et al (1988) Transesophageal two-dimensional echocardiography and color flow velocity mapping in the evaluation of cardiac valve prosthesis. Circulation 78:848–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Khandheria BK, Seward JB, Oh JK, Freeman WK, Tajik AJ (1989) Mitral prosthesis malfunction: utility of transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol (Suppl A) 13:69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Seward JB, Khandheria BK, Oh JK, Abel M, et al (1988) Transesophageal echocardiography: technique, anatomic correlation implementation and clinical applications. Mayo Clinic Proc63:649–680.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tajik AJ, Seward JB, Hagler DJ, Mair DD, Lie JT (1978) Two-dimensional real-time ultrasonic imaging of the heart and great vessels: technique, image orientation, structure identification, and validation. Mayo Clinic Proc 57:271–303.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nishimura RA, Miller FA, Callahan MJ, Benassi RC (1985) Doppler echocardiography: theory, instrumentation, technique, and application. Mayo Clinic Proc 60:321–343.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hatle L, Angelsen B (1982) Doppler ultrasound in cardiology: physical principles and clinical applications. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Khandheria BK, Tajik AJ, Reeder GS, Calahan MJ, et al (1986) Doppler color flow imaging: a new technique for visualization and characterization of the blood flow jet in mitral stenosis. Mayo Clinic Proc 61:623–630.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Helnstein IR, Marbarger JP, Perez JE (1983) Ultrasonic assessment of the St Jude prosthetic valve: M-mode, two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 68:879–905.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alam M, Lokjer JB, Pickard SD, Goldstein S (1983) Echocardiographic evaluation of porcine bioprosthetic valves: experience with 309 normal and 59 dysanctioning valves. Am J Cardiol52:309–315.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Forman MB, Phelon BK, Robertson RM, Virmani R (1985) Correlation of two-dimensional echocardiography and pathologic findings in porcine valve dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 5:224–230.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kotier M, Mintz G, Panidis I, et al (1983) Non-invasive evaluation of normal and abnormal prosthetic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 2:151–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Panidis IP, Rose J, Mintz GS (1986) Normal and abnormal prosthetic valve function as assessed by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 8:317–326.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sagar KB, Wann LS, Paulsen WHJ, Romhilt DW (1986) Doppler echocardiographic evaluation of Hancock and Bjork-Shiley prosthetic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 7:681–687.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Erbel R, Rohman S, Drexler M, et al (1988) Improved diagnostic value of echocardiography in patients with infective endocarditis by transesophageal approach. A prospective study. Eur Heart J 9:43–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Khandheria, B.K. (1989). Value and Limitations of Transesophageal Echocardiography in Mitral Valvular Prosthesis. In: Erbel, R., Khandheria, B.K., Brennecke, R., Meyer, J., Seward, J.B., Tajik, A.J. (eds) Transesophageal Echocardiography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74257-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74257-6_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-74259-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-74257-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics