Advertisement

A New Model for the Cleaved Si (111)-(2x1) Surface

  • D. Haneman
  • M. G. Lagally
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Surface Sciences book series (SSSUR, volume 14)

Abstract

There is currently general agreement about the structures of Si(100) and annealed Si(111) (7×7) surfaces, but the situation for the cleaved Si(111) (2×1) surface is less satisfactory [1]. A Si crystal in the (111) orientation can be viewed as a series of tetrahedra with one bond vertical and the other three forming the base, resulting in a structure that consists of double layers of closely spaced atomic planes (d = 0.78 Å) separated from each other by the Si interatomic distance d = 2.35 Å. All of the existing models use as their basis the assumption that in cleavage, the one bond that is oriented normal to the (111) surface breaks, so that the termination is the closely-spaced-layer pair that then reconstructs to form the (2×1) surface.

Keywords

Double Layer Partial Dislocation Break Bond Charge Cloud Original Dislocation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    For a recent review of Si surfaces, see D. Haneman, Repts. Prog. Phys. 50, 1045 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. C. Pandey, Phys. Rev. Letters 47, 1913 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. A. Stroscio, R. M. Feenstra, and A. P. Fein, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A5, 838 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. E. Northrup and M. L. Cohen, Phys. Rev. Letters 49, 1349 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    I. L. F. Ray and D. J. H. Cockayne, Philos. Mag. 22, 853 (1970); D. J. H. Cockayne and A. Hons, J. Physique, Coll. CiTü, H (1979) and references therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. B. Hirsch, J. Physique, Coll. C6, 40, 27 (1979); A. Ourmadz, G. R. Anstis, and P. B. Hirsch, Philos. Mag. A48, 139 (1983).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. B. Hirsch, J. Electr. Micros. 118, 3 (1980).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. Alexander, J. C. H. Spence, D. Shindo, H. Gottschalk, and N. Long, Philos. Mag. A53, 627 (1986).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Hornstra, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 5, 129 (1958);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. J. P. Hirth and J. Lothe, Theory of Dislocations, (McGraw-Hill, New York 1968).Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    There are a number of measurements and calculations. For a first- principles calculation and listing of earlier work, see M. Y. Chou, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. B32 7979 (1985).Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    D. J. H. Cockayne, private communication; D. J. H. Cockayne, A. Hons, and J. C. H. Spence, Micron 11, Suppl. 1, 32 (1980).Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    P. N. Keating, Phys. Rev US, 145 637 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 13.
    J. A. Appelbaum and D. R. Hamann, Surface Sci. 74, 21 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 14.
    E. O. Kane, Phys. Rev. jm, B31 7865 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 15.
    For a review, see S. S. Brenner, In: Fiber Composite Materials, ASM, Metals Park (1985).Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    D. M. Marsh, In: Fracture of Solids, ed. by D. C. Drucker and J. J. Gilman, (Interscience, New York 1963). See also R. L. Mehan and J. A. Herzog, In: Whisker Technology, ed. by A. P. Levitt, (Wiley- Interscience, New York 1970).Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    This structure is similar to that obtained by arbitrarily adding adatom chains onto the ideal (111) surface, as suggested by R. Sciwatz, Surface Sci. 2, 473 (1964). To create adatoms requires thermal treatment sufficient to give atomic transport at the surface, and thus a structure involving adatoms is not directly applicable to a cleaved surface. In the present model for the cleavage process, the chains are an integral part of the structure, being the normal outermost layer.Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    J. J. Gilman, J. Appl. Phys. 31, 2208 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 19.
    L. Smit, R. M. Tromp, and J. F. van der Veen, Surface Sci. 163 315 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 20.
    A more extensive exposition of these concepts will be presented elsewhere. D. Haneman and M. G. Lagally, J. Vac. Sci. Techno!. A6_ (1988) (submitted).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Haneman
    • 1
  • M. G. Lagally
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Condensed-Matter PhysicsUniversity of New South WalesKensingtonAustralia

Personalised recommendations