Advertisement

Technical Support of Drug Detection

Conference paper
  • 93 Downloads

Abstract

For a number of years the customs service and police forces have been demanding the provision of better technical means for detecting and identifying narcotics. The objective of improved detection methods is not so much to reduce availability, but to increase the risk for the illegal drug dealer. The proportion of drug seizures based on the estimated total annual consumption appears to be very low.1 An estimate of the total annual consumption and the percentage of drugs seized is difficult to make, since factors such as the total number of drug addicts, the average daily demand, the stretching of the quality of the drug from the “wholesaler” to the addict, and the true amount of drugs in transit (as opposed to the amount of narcotics brought back into the country) have to be taken into account.2 Although the percentage of seizures is very low, it is nevertheless a basis for assessing the effectiveness of improved interdiction methods. Even a minimal increase in this percentage could drastically raise the risk associated with trafficking narcotics. Moreover, the police might receive additional information on the hidden, complex supply system of the drug trade and, in turn, could draw up measures for more effective prosecution.

Keywords

Drug Trade Custom Authority Drug Detection Cargo Container Total Annual Consumption 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alzen G, Banning S, Günther R (1987) Sonographische Nachweisbarkeit von Betäubungsmittelbehältnissen im Gastrointestinaltrakt. Experimentelle Untersuchung beim Hund. In: Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Röntgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin 146: 544–547Google Scholar
  2. Brugger S (1983) Strategische Planung als polizeiliches Instrument am Beispiel der Dro- gendelinquenz. In: Kube E, Störzer HU, Brugger S (eds) Wissenschaftliche Krimi¬nalistik. Grundlagen und Perspektiven. Teilband 1. Wiesbaden, pp 281–295 (BKA-Forschungsreihe, vol 16/1)Google Scholar
  3. Bundesminister für Jugend, Familie und Gesundheit (1980) Aktionsprogramm der Bundesregierung zur Bekämpfung des Drogen- und Rauschmittelmißbrauchs. Bonn 1980 (unpublished paper from Nov. 16, 1980 )Google Scholar
  4. Kreuzer A, Gebhardt C, Maassen M, Stein-Hilbers M (1981) Drogenabhängigkeit und Kontrolle. Kriminologische Untersuchung über Phänomenologie des Heroinkonsums und polizeiliche Drogenkontrolle. Wiesbaden (BKA-Forschungsreihe, vol 14 )Google Scholar
  5. Council of Europe—Cooperation Group to Combat Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking in Drags (Pompidou Group) (1986) Means of detection and working methods to fight drag trafficking by air. “Technical and scientific means”. Report given at the Seminar on control services in major European airports (Paris, March 6–7, 1986) Strasbourg (P-PG(86)22)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations