Advertisement

Recent Results from Nikko at TRISTAN

  • K. Kinoshita
Conference paper

Abstract

The search for elementary particles with electromagnetic couplings deviating significantly from the electron charge e has been strongly motivated by theory. In particular, the correlation noted by Dirac in 193l[l] between the quantization of electric and magnetic charge implied the existence of magnetic monopoles with charge in units \(gD \equiv {e \over {2\alpha }} \sim 68.5e.\) Our understanding of the elementary particles and their interactions has evolved dramatically since that time, but the original hypothesis still stands, unconfirmed yet not ruled out by experimental data. From a theoretical point of view, recent trends indicate a preference toward very massive monopoles, well beyond the reach of any accelerator. Although these models are elegant, they are unfortunately difficult to test experimentally, and the few tests which have been employed have thus far failed to support them. In such a context it is important to pursue alternative possibilities, to probe as much unexplored area as is feasible within technological and practical limits.

Keywords

Invariant Mass Pair Production Magnetic Charge Integrate Luminosity Beam Pipe 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    P.A.M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. London 133, 60 (1931).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.L. Fleischer, P.B. Price and R.M. Walker, Nuclear Tracks in Solids (University of California Press, Berkeley, 1975).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B.G. Cartwright, E.K. Shirk and P.B. Price, Nucl. Instr. Meth. 153,457 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P.B. Price, L.M. Cook and A. Marker, Nature 325, 137 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.P. Ahlen, Phys. Rev. D17, 229 (1978).ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Kinoshita, M. Fujii, K. Nakajima, P.B. Price and S. Tasaka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1610 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A.L.S. Angelis et al., Phys. Lett. B87, 398 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.A. Carrigan, Jr., F.A. Nezrick and B.P. Strauss, Phys. Rev. D8, 3717 (1973);ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 8a.
    D. Fryberger, T. Coan, K. Kinoshita and P.B. Price, Phys. Rev. D29, 1524 (1984);ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 8b.
    P.B.Price, Ren Guoxiao and K. Kinoshita, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2523 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 9.
    R.R.Ross, P.H. Eberhard, L.W. Alvarez and R.D. Watt, Phys. Rev. D8, 698 (1973).ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Kinoshita
    • 1
  1. 1.Harvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations