Advertisement

“3D” in NLP: Determiners, Descriptions, and the Dialog Memory in the XTRA Project

  • Carola Reddig
Part of the Informatik-Fachberichte book series (INFORMATIK, volume 181)

Abstract

A natural language processing system is only user-relevant if it can internally deal with the meaning of natural language utterances in a systematic way. For NL determiners, this paper contributes to this goal in two ways: It decomposes the determiner problem into its representational and interpretational aspects corresponding to the knowledge levels of the modular dialog system XTRA; and, by defining their complex meaning on these levels, it evaluates the determiners and determiner sequences possible in German and the descriptions formed by them.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Allgayer, J., Harbusch, K., Kobsa, A., Reddig, C., Reithinger, N., Schmauks, D. (1988): XTRA: A Natural-Language Access System to Expert Systems. SFB 314, FB Informatik IV, University of Saarbruecken, to appearGoogle Scholar
  2. Allgayer, Jürgen, and Reddig, Carola (1988): What KL-ONE Lookalikes Need to Cope with Natural Language Quantifiers. SFB 314, FB Informatik, University of Saarbruecken. forthcGoogle Scholar
  3. Barwise, Jon, and Cooper, Robin (1981): “Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Languages.” Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brachman, Ronald J., and Schmolze, James G. (1985): “An Overview of the KL-ONE Knowledge Representation System.” Cognitive Science 9,171–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Habel, Christopher U. (1986): Plurals, Cardinalities, and Structures of Determination. COLING 86, 62–64Google Scholar
  6. Harbusch, Karin (1986): A First Snapshot of XTRAGRAM, a Unification Grammar Based on PATR. Memo 14, SFB 314, FB Informatik, University of SaarbrueckenGoogle Scholar
  7. Heim, Irene (1982): The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, AmherstGoogle Scholar
  8. Kamp, Hans (1981): “A theroy of truth and semantic representation.” in Groenendijk et al. (eds.): Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Amsterdam: Mathematical CentreGoogle Scholar
  9. Kobsa, A., Allgayer, J., Harbusch, K., Reddig, C., Reithinger, N., Wahlster, W. (1986): Combining Deictic Gestures and Natural Language for Referent Identification. COLING 86, 356–361Google Scholar
  10. Kobsa Aifred (1987): SB-ONE and Meta-SB-ONE: Two Saarbruecken KL-ONE Languages. Paper presented at the First German KL-ONE Meeting at Saarbruecken, West GermanyGoogle Scholar
  11. Loebner, Sebastian (1987): Natural Language and Generalized Quantifier Theory. In: Gärdenfors, Peter (ed.): Generalized Quantifiers - Linguistic and Logical Approaches. Dordrecht: ReidelGoogle Scholar
  12. Reichman, Rachel (1985): Getting Computers to Talk like You and Me. Cambridge/Mass.: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  13. Ripplinger, Bärbel, and Kobsa, Alfred (1988): “PLUG: Benutzerführung auf der Basis einer dynamisch veränderlichen Zielhierarchie.” in this volumeGoogle Scholar
  14. Roberts, Craige (1987): Modal Subordination, Anaphora, and Distributivity. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Massachusetts, AmherstGoogle Scholar
  15. Teubert, Wolfgang (1979): Valenz des Substantivs. IdS 49, Düsseldorf: SchwabGoogle Scholar
  16. Winograd, Terry (1981): Computational Models for the Semantics of Natural Languages. DraftGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carola Reddig
    • 1
  1. 1.SFB 314: AI - Knowledge-Based Systems FB 10 - Informatik IVUniversity of SaarbrueckenSaarbruecken 11Germany

Personalised recommendations