Facets of Knowledge About Natural Language Syntax Representation and Use in Parsing and Generation

  • Helmut Horacek
  • Claudius Pyka
Part of the Informatik-Fachberichte book series (INFORMATIK, volume 181)


This paper aims at a concise representation of purely static knowledge which expresses the syntactic well-formedness of a subset of German. A method is proposed for automatically exploiting this knowledge in order to obtain dynamic knowledge about language analysis and production. The efficient and skillful use as well as integration into a parser and a generator is outlined.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Block, ‘LFG and Natural Language Generation’, WISBER Bericht Nr. 10, Verbundvorhaben WISBER, Universität Hamburg, 1986Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Block, ‘Can a Parsing Grammar Be Used for NL Generation’, to appear in Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Language Generation, M. Zock (ed.), Royaumont, 1987Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Busemann, ‘Generierung mit GPSG’. GWAI-87, K. Morik (ed.), pp. 355–364, Springer-Verlag, Geseke, 1987Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Dörre, S. Momma, ‘Generierung aus f-Strukturen als strukturgesteuerte Ableitung’, GWAI-87, K. Morik (ed.), pp. 54–63, Springer-Verlag, Geseke, 1987Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Emele, ‘FREGE - Ein objektorientierter FRont-End-GEnerator’, GWAI-87, K. Morik (ed.), pp. 64–73, Springer-Verlag, Geseke, 1987Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Horacek, ‘The Application of Unification For Syntactic Generation in German’, to appear in Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Language Generation, M. Zock (ed.), Royaumont, 1987Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Kaplan, J. Bresnan, ‘Lexical -Functional Grammar: A Formal System For Grammatical Representation’, in ‘The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations‘, J, Bresnan (ed.), pp. 173–281, The MIT Press, London, 1982Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.-M. Lancel, F. Rousselot, N. Simonin, ‘A Grammar Used For Parsing and Generation’, COLING-86, pp. 536–539, Bonn, 1986Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Meier, J. Kindermann, ‘Generierung mit Lexical–Functional Grammar (LFG)’, GWAI-86 und 2. Österreichische Artificial-Intelligence-Tagung, C.-R. Rollinger, W. Horn (eds.), PP- 113–118, Springer-Verlag, Ottenstein, Niederösterreich, 1986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Netter, ‘An LFG-Proposal for the Treatment of German Word Order’, COLING-86, pp. 494–496, Bonn, 1986Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. Pyka, ‘Syntactic Analysis’, LOKI Report NLI-4.1, ESPRIT project LOKI, University of Hamburg, 1985Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Tomita, J. Carboneil, ‘Another Stride Towards Knowledge–Based Machine Translation’, COLING-86, pp. 636–638, Bonn, 1986Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helmut Horacek
    • 1
  • Claudius Pyka
    • 2
  1. 1.Fachbereich InformatikProjekt WISBER Universität HamburgHamburg 36Deutschland
  2. 2.Fachbereich InformatikProjekt LOKI Universität HamburgHamburg 50Deutschland

Personalised recommendations