Skip to main content

Resource Depletion and Habitat Segregation by Competitors Under Predation Hazard

  • Conference paper
Size-Structured Populations

Abstract

Individuals of different sizes in size-structured populations often differ greatly in the use of resources and/or space. Spectacular examples include shifts, within a lifetime, from carnivory to herbivory (e.g., some turtles; Clark and Gibbons 1969), or from herbivory to carnivory (e.g., some copepods; Neill and Peacock 1980), or from aquatic to terrestrial habitats (e.g., many amphibians). Many other species show large shifts in prey size or habitat use as they grow, but yet other species show little difference across sizes (Fraser 1976; Polis 1984; Werner and Gilliam 1984; Persson this Vol.). Thus, patterns of resource and habitat use within a species vary from complete segregation between two given size classes, to partial overlap, to complete overlap. The presence or absence of such diet or habitat segregation between different size classes can greatly affect population structure and dynamics. For example, the degree of overlap between different size classes influences population stability, and the intensity of competition between classes influences, in interesting ways, whether increases in the density of a given class increases or decreases the density of other classes (Tschumy 1982; Mittelbach and Chesson 1987; Ebenman this Vol.).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahams MV, Dill LM (1989) A determination of the energetic equivalence of the risk of predation. Ecology (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams P (1984) Foraging time optimization and interactions in food webs. Am Nat 124:80–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breden F, Stoner G (1987) Male predation risk determines female preference in the Trinidad guppy. Nature (London) 329:831–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark DB, Gibbons JW (1969) Dietary shift in the turtle Pseudemys scripta (Schoepff) from youth to maturity. Copeia 1969:704–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill LM (1987) Animal decision making and its ecological consequences: the future of aquatic ecology and behaviour. Can J Zool 65:803–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endler J (1980) Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 34:76–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan R (1987) A generalized habitat matching rule. Evol Ecol 1:5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser DF (1976) Coexistence of salamanders in the genus Plethodon: variation of the Santa Rosalia theme. Ecology 57:238–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser DF, Gilliam JF (1987) Feeding under predation hazard: response of the guppy and Hart’s rivulus from sites with contrasting predation hazard. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 21:203–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam JF, Fraser DF (1987) Habitat selection under predation hazard: test of a model with foraging minnows. Ecology 68:1856–1862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilliam JF, Fraser DF, Sabat AM (1989) Strong effects of foraging minnows on a stream benthic invertebrate community. Ecology (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskins CP, Haskins EF, McLaughlin JJA, Hewitt RE (1961) Polymorphism and population structure in Lebistes reticulata, a population study. In: Blair WD (ed) Vertebrate speciation. Univ Texas Press, Austin, pp 320–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfman GS (1986) Behavioral responses of prey fishes during predator-prey interactions. In: Feder ME, Lauder GV (eds) Predator-prey relationships: perspectives and approaches from the study of lower vertebrates. Univ Press, Chicago, III, pp 135–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houde AE (1988) Genetic differences in female choice between two guppy populations. Anim Behav (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives AR, Dobson AP (1987) Antipredator behavior and the population dynamics of simple predatorprey systems. Am Nat 130:431–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwasa Y (1982) Vertical migration of Zooplankton: a game between predators and prey. Am Nat 120:171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneib RT (1987) Predation risk and use of intertidal habitats by young fishes and shrimp. Ecology 68:379–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liley NR, Seghers BH (1975) Factors affecting the morphology and behavior of guppies in Trinidad. In: Baerends GP, Beer C, Manning A (eds) Function and evolution in behaviour. Oxford Univ Press, pp 92-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M (1986) Constraints placed by predators on feeding behaviour. In: Pitcher TJ (ed) The behaviour of teleost fishes. Croom Helm, London, pp 236–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelbach GG, Chesson PL (1987) Predation risk: indirect effects on fish populations. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. Univ New Engl, Hanover, NH, pp 315–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill WE, Peacock A (1980) Breaking the bottleneck: interactions of invertebrate predators and nutrients in oligotrophic lakes. In: Kerfoot WC (ed) Evolution and ecology of Zooplankton communities. Univ Press New Engl, Hanover, NH, pp 715–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Sutherland WJ (1986) Ideal free distributions when individuals differ in competitive ability: phenotype-limited ideal free models. Anim Behav 34:1222–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA (1981) The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 12:225–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA (1984) Age structure component of niche width and intraspecific resource partitioning: can age groups function as ecological species? Am Nat 123:541–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA, McCormick SJ (1987) Intraguild predation and competition among desert scorpions. Ecology 68:332–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power ME (1987) Predator avoidance by grazing fishes in temperate streams: importance of stream depth and prey size. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. Univ Press New Engl, Hanover, NH, pp 333–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power ME, Matthews WJ, Stewart AJ (1985) Grazing minnows, piscivorous bass, and stream algae: dynamics of a strong interaction. Ecology 66:1448–1456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reznick DN (1982) Genetic determination of offspring size in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Am Nat 120:181–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig ML (1981) A theory of habitat selection. Ecology 62:327–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser IJ (1987) The role of predation in age-and size-related habitat use by stream fishes. Ecology 68:651–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1980) Optimal behavior: can foragers balance two conflicting demands? Science 210:1041–1043.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1987) Predator and prey lifestyles: an evolutionary and ecological overview. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. Univ Press New Engl, Hanover, NH, pp 203–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1987) Prey refuges and predator-prey stability. Theor Popul Biol 31:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamps JA (1983) The relationship between ontogenetic habitat shifts, competition and predator avoidance in a juvenile lizard (Anolis aeneus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Univ Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ, Parker GA (1985) Distribution of unequal predators. In: Sibly RM and Smith RH (eds) Behavioural ecology. Blackwell, London, pp 255–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschumy WO (1982) Competition between juveniles and adults in age-structured populations. Theor Popul Biol 21:255–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Gilliam JF (1984) The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:393–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Hall DJ (1988) Ontogenetic habitat shifts in the bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus): the foraging rate-predation risk tradeoff. Ecology (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Gilliam JF, Hall DJ, Mittelbach GG (1983a) An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64:1540–1548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Mittelbach GG, Hall DJ, Gilliam JF (1983b) Experimental tests of optimal habitat use in fish: the role of relative habitat profitability. Ecology 64:1540–1548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gilliam, J.F., Fraser, D.F. (1988). Resource Depletion and Habitat Segregation by Competitors Under Predation Hazard. In: Ebenman, B., Persson, L. (eds) Size-Structured Populations. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74001-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74001-5_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-74003-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-74001-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics