Skip to main content

Suggestion as Social Biasing of Meaning Tests: A Heiderian Extension of the Miller, Galanter, and Pribram Paradigm — Catalyzing McGuire’s Theory of Attitude Change

  • Conference paper
Suggestion and Suggestibility

Abstract

Looking at the history of psychology, one may notice a definite parallel in the currents and countercurrents of scientific interest devoted, on the one hand, to the phenomena of emotion, and on the other, to those of suggestion. Both interests reached a climax at the beginning of the discipline; and both fell into disrepute because they were considered speculative and not amenable to methodologically sound and truly objective, operationally oriented scientific research. The name and fate, the rise and fall, of McDougall (1910, 1923) highlights that mainstream development of the discipline. Presently, however, emotion is having a strong comeback as a research topic in the field, with more and more journals and editorial boards being responsive to papers in this area. The present volume, which would have been unthinkable not so long ago, might testify that suggestion, too, is returning to the scientific scene. That coincidence is no happenstance: the early notion of suggestion had a strong connotative, if not denotative semantic link to the notion of emotional contagion (Gefühlsansteckung). As will be shown below, both phenomenologically and according to present theorizing, there is a decisively emotional component involved in the process of suggestion that can be seen on close analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Asch, S.E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men (pp. 177–190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S.E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against an unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70, No. 9 (Whole No. 416).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R.F., & Cohen, S.P. (1979). Symlog:A manual for the case study of groups. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1965). Social psychology. New York: Free.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, E. (1941). An explanation of “emotional” phenomena without the use of the concept “emotion”. Journal of General Psychology, 25, 283–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, E. (1962). Activation and behavior. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C.I. (1954). Effects of the mass media of communication. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1062–1103). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C.L. (1933). Hypnosis and suggestibility. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R.S. (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 37, 1019–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R.S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist, 39, 124–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippitt, R., Polansky, F., Redl, F., & Rosen, S. (1952). The dynamics of power. Human Relations, 5, 37–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, W. (1910). Introduction to social psychology. Boston: Luce.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, W. (1923). Outline of psychology. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W.J. (1968). Personality and attitude change: An information-processing theory. In A.G. Greenwald, T.C. Brock, & T.M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 171–196). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W.J. (1972). Attitude change: The information-processing paradigm. In C.G. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychology (pp. 108–141). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, W.J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 233–346). New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G.A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K.H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Millman, S. (1965). The relationship between anxiety, learning, and opinion change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H.A. (1951). Toward a classification of interaction. In T. Parsons & E.A. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action (pp. 434–464). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwanenberg, E. (1978, March). Notes on affectivity, general and social. Paper presented at the 4th general meeting of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology, Weimar, East Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwanenberg, E. (1981). Sozialer Affekt: Konstruktüberprüfung des Schachter-Paradigmas (Social affect: Examining the constructs of the Schachter paradigm). In W. Michaelis (Ed.), Bericht über den 32. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Zürich 1980 (Vol. 1, pp. 317–324). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwanenberg, E. (1984a, May). World of probability and world of meaning: Vista on affect or Miller, Galanter, and Pribram revisited. Paper presented at the 4th general meeting of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwanenberg, E. (1984b, July). Looking at the meaning world in groups. Paper presented at the 2nd European workshop “SYMLOG and Interaction in Groups”, Konstanz, FRG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. (1935). A study of some social factors in perception. Archives of Psychology, No. 187, 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J.W., & Kelley, H.H. (1969). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R.B. (1984). On the primacy of affect. American Psychologist, 39, 117–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schwanenberg, E. (1989). Suggestion as Social Biasing of Meaning Tests: A Heiderian Extension of the Miller, Galanter, and Pribram Paradigm — Catalyzing McGuire’s Theory of Attitude Change. In: Gheorghiu, V.A., Netter, P., Eysenck, H.J., Rosenthal, R. (eds) Suggestion and Suggestibility. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73875-3_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73875-3_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-73877-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-73875-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics