Advertisement

Cortical Event-Related Evoked Potential Correlates of Hypnotic Hallucination

  • D. Spiegel
Conference paper

Abstract

Cortical event-related potentials (ERPs) have been productively employed in the study of attentional processes in humans. Since hypnosis involves an alteration in both attention (Spiegel & Spiegel, 1978; Tellegen & Atkinson, 1974) and perception (Orne, 1959), it makes sense to examine for any hypnotically induced effects of perceptual alteration on measures of ERP. The amplitude of the early exogenous components of the evoked response is related to stimulus intensity and selection of a perceptual channel (Ford, Roth, Dirk, & Kopell, 1978; Hillyard & Picton, 1979), while the later endogenous components are affected by changes in the strategy of information processing. For example, the amplitude of the P300 component of the evoked potential waveform is increased by the element of surprise and the relevance of the stimulus to a response task (Sutton, Braren, & Zubin, 1965; Naatanen, 1969; Hillyard, Picton, & Regan, 1978; Duncan-Johnson & Donchin, 1980; Johnson, 1980; Baribeau-Braun, Picton, & Gosselin, 1983).

Keywords

Clinical Neurophysiology Hypnotic State Hypnotic Suggestion Hypnotic Susceptibility Perceptual Channel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amadeo, M., & Yanovski, A. (1975). Evoked potentials and selective attention in subjects capable of hypnotic analgesia. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 23, 200–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreassi, J.L., Balinsky, B., & Gallichio, J.A., De Simone, J.J., & Meilers, B.W. (1976). Hypnotic suggestion of stimulus change and visual cortical evoked potential. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 42, 371–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baer, L., Ackerman, R., Surmon, O., Correia, J., Griffith, J., Alpert, N., & Hackett, T. (1985). PET studies during hypnosis and hypnotic suggestion. In P. Berner (Ed.) Psychiatry: The State of the Art, Biological Psychiatry, Higher Nervous Activity (pp. 293–298). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  4. Barabasz, A.F., & Gregson, R. (1979). Antarctic wintering-over, suggestion and transient olfactory stimulation: EEG evoked potentials and electrodermal responses. Biological Psychology, 9, 285–295.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barabasz, A.F., & Lonsdale, C. (1983). Effects of hypnosis on P300 olfactory-evoked potential amplitudes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92, 520–523.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baribeau-Braun, J., Picton, T.W., & Gosselin, J.U. (1983). A neurophysiological evaluation of abnormal information processing. Science, 219, 874–876.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beck, E.C., Barolin, G.S. (1965). The effect of hypnotic suggestion on evoked potentials. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 140, 154–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beck, E.D., Dustman, R.D., Beier, E.G. (1966). Hpynotic suggestions and visually evoked potentials. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 20, 397–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clynes, M., Koh, M., & Lifshitz, K. (1964). Dynamics and spatial behavior of light-evoked potentials, their modification under hypnosis, and on-line correlation in relation to rhythmic components. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 112, 468–509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crasilneck, H.B., Hall, J.A., (1985). Clinial Hypnosis: Principles and Applications, 2nd Ed. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  11. Crawford, H., Skolnick, B., Benson, D., Gur, R.E., & Gur, R.C. (1985). Regional cerebral blood flow in hypnosis and hypnotic analgesia. Paper presented at the 10th International Congress of Hypnosis and Psychosomatic Medicine, Toronto, Canada, August.Google Scholar
  12. Dubin, L.L., Shapiro, S.S. (1974). Use of hypnosis to facilitate dental extraction and hemostasis in a classic hemophiliac with a high antibody titer to factor VIII. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 17, 79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duncan-Johnson, C.C., & Donchin, E. (1980). The relation of P300 latency to reaction time as a function of expectancy. Progress in Brain Research, 54, 717–722.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ford, J.M., Roth, W.T., Dirk, S.J., & Kopell, B.S. (1978). Evoked potential correlates of signal recognition between and within modalities. Science, 181, 465–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Galbraith, G.C., Cooper, L.M., & London, P. (1972). Hypnotic susceptibility and the sensory evoked response. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 80, 509–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grabowska, M.J. (1971). The efect of hypnosis and hypnotic suggestion on the blood flow in the extremities. Polish Medical Journal, 10, 1044–1051.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Guerrero-Figueroa, R., & Heath, R.G. (1964). Evoked responses and changes during attentive factors in man. Archives of Neurology, 10, 74–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Halliday, A.M., & Mason, A.A. (1964). Cortical evoked potentials during hypnotic anaesthesia. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 16, 312–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hansen, J.C., & Hillyard, S.A. (1980). Endogenous brain potentials associated with selective auditory attention. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 49, 277–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hernandez-Peon, R., & Donoso, M. (1959). Influence of attention and suggestion upon subcortical evoked electric activity in the human brain. In L. Van Bogaert & J. Radermecker (Eds.), First international congress of neurological sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 385–396). London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  21. Hilgard, E.R. (1965). Hypnotic susceptibility. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.Google Scholar
  22. Hilgard, E.R. (1977). Divided consciousness: Multiple controls in human thought and action. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Hillyard, S.A., Picton, T.W., & Regan, D. (1978). Sensation, perception, and attention: analysis using ERPs. In E. Callaway, P. Tueting, & S.H. Koslow (Eds.), Event-related brain potentials in man. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  24. Hillyard, S.A., Picton, T.W. (1979). Event-related brain potentials and selective information processing in man. In J.E. Desmedt (Ed.), Progress in clinical neurophysiology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–52). Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, R. (1980). P300 amplitude and probabilistic judgements. Progress in Brain Research, 54, 723–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klein, K., & Spiegel, D. (1988). Hypnotic alteration of gastric acid secretion. Submitted to Journal of the American Medical Association.Google Scholar
  27. Morgan, A.H., MacDonald, H., & Hilgard, E.R. (1974). EEG alpha: Lateral asymmetry related to task and hypnotizability. Psychophysiology, 11, 275–282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Naatanen, R. (1969). Anticipation of relevant stimuli and evoked potentials: A comment on Donchin’s and Cohen’s “averaged evoked potentials and intramodality selective attention.” Perceptual and Motor Skills, 28, 639–646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Orne, M.T. (1959). The nature of hypnosis: Artifact and essence. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 277–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Serafetinides, E.A. (1968). Electrophysiological responses to sensory stimulation under hypnosis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 125, 112–113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Shor, R.E., & Orne, E.C. (1962). Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists.Google Scholar
  32. Spiegel, D. (1980). Trance as metaphor: The symbolism of control. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Spiegel, D. (1985). The use of hypnosis in controlling cancer pain. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 35, 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Spiegel, D., Cutcomb, S., Ren, C., & Pribram, K. (1985). Hypnotic hallucination alters evoked potentials. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94, 249–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Spiegel, D., Bierre, P., & Rootenberg, J. (1988). Hypnotic alteration of somatosensory perception. Submitted to American Journal of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  36. Spiegel, H. (1970). Termination of smoking by a single treatment. Archives of Environmental Health, 20, 736–742.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Spiegel, H., & Spiegel, D. (1978). Trance and treatment: Clinical uses of hypnosis. New York: Basic. (Reissued by American Psychiatric Press, 1987).Google Scholar
  38. Sutton, S., Braren, M., & Zubin, J. (1965). Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science, 150, 1187–1188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Teilegen, A., & Atkinson, G. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (“absorption”), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 268–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Nuys, D. (1973). Meditation, attention, and hypnotic susceptibility: A correlation study. International Journal of Clinical & Experimental Hypnosis, 21, 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weitzenhoffer, A.M. (1980). Hypnotic susceptibility revisited. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 22, 130–146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Weitzenhoffer, A.M., & Hilgard, E.R. (1962). Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale: form C. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists.Google Scholar
  43. Wilson, N.J. (1968). Neurophysiologic alterations with hypnosis. Diseases of the Nervous System, 29, 618–620.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Zakrzewski, K., & Szelenberger, W. (1981). Visual evoked potentials in hypnosis: A longitudinal approach. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 29, 77–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Spiegel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations