Neuronal Remodeling After Early Cerebellar Hemispherectomy in Rats

  • A. Gramsbergen
Conference paper


Numerous experimental studies have demonstrated that brain lesions at early stages of maturation lead to a greater degree of neuronal rearrangement than such lesions at adulthood. These morphological changes have been regarded as the substrate for a greater compensational capacity of the immature brain. Margaret Kennard has shown that after unilateral removal of the motor and premotor cortex in newly born rhesus monkeys no motor disturbances developed, while after such lesions at later ages monkeys remained impaired (Kennard 1942). However, more recent experiments with lesions of other brain areas raised doubts that compensation is always complete. On the contrary, even bizarre behavioral anomalies may occur, particularly after lesions at young ages. Schneider and Jhaveri (1974), for instance, made unilateral lesions in the optic tectum of Syrian hamsters at birth. On testing, these animals as adults carried out abnormal head movements away from visual stimuli. In addition, the authors demonstrated retinotectal fibers recrossing to the remaining colliculus which might explain these abnormal movements. These two examples may illustrate the complicated relationship between neuronal remodeling after early lesions and the capacity of functional compensation.


Sensorimotor Cortex Cerebellar Nucleus Pontine Nucleus Inferior Olivary Nucleus Interpositus Nucleus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Angaut P, Batini C, Billard JM, Daniel H (1986) The cerebellorubral projection in the rat: retro-grade anatomical study. Neurosci Lett 68: 63–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bentivoglio M, Molinari M (1981) Axonal branches of the same cerebellar neurons terminate bilaterally in the thalamus. Neurosci Lett 23: 291–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bentivoglio M, Minciacchi D, Molinari M (1986) Structural mechanisms of postlesional remodelling in the central nervous system. Ital J Neurol Sci, Suppl 5: 29–36Google Scholar
  4. Castro AJ (1978) Projections of the superior cerebellar peduncle in rats and the development of new connections in response to neonatal hemicerebellectomy. J Comp Neurol 178: 611–628PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castro AJ, Mihailoff GA (1983) Corticopontine remodelling after cortical and/or cerebellar lesions in newborn rats. J Comp Neurol 219: 112–123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castro AJ, Smith DE (1979) Plasticity of spinovestibular projections in response to hemicerebellectomy in newborn rats. Neurosci Lett 12: 69–74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Flumerfelt BA, Hrycyshyn AW (1985) Precerebellar nuclei and red nucleus. In: Paxinos G (ed) The rat nervous system, vol 2. Academic Press, London, pp 221–250Google Scholar
  8. Gramsbergen A (1981) Locomotor behaviour after cerebellar lesions in the young rat. In: Flohr H, Precht W (eds) Lesion-induced neuronal plasticity in sensorimotor systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 324–336Google Scholar
  9. Gramsbergen A (1982) The effects of cerebellar hemispherectomy in the young rat. I. Behavioural sequelae. Behav Brain Res 6: 85–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gramsbergen A, Ijkema-Paassen J (1982) CNS plasticity after hemicerebellectomy in the young rat. Quantitative relations between aberrant and normal cerebello-rubral projections. Neurosci Lett 33: 129–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gramsbergen A, IJkema-Paassen J (1984) The effects of early cerebellar hemispherectomy in the rat: behavioural, neuroanatomical and electrophysiological sequelae. In: Finger S, Almli CR (eds) Early brain damage, vol 2. Aademic Press, London, pp 155–177Google Scholar
  12. Gramsbergen A, IJkema-Paassen J (1987) Do early lesions affect cell death in the central nervous system? A study on the effects of early cerebellar hemispherectomy in rats. J Comp Neurol 255: 617–624PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gramsbergen A, Kok LP, Poortema K, Schaafsma W (1987) Determining nucleolar multiplicity and cell number from sectional data. J Microsc 145: 69–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gwyn DG, Flumerfelt BA (1974) A comparison of the distribution of cortical and cerebellar afferents in the red nucleus of the rat. Brain Res 69: 130–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haroian AJ, Campellone AD (1986) A quantitative analysis of the ipsilateral cerebellothalamic projection following hemicerebellectomy in neonatal rats. A retrograde HRP study. Dev Brain Res 26: 69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ho CP, Leong SK (1977) A cerebellar projection onto the pontine nuclei in the albino rat. Exp Brain Res 30: 149–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kennard MA (1942) Cortical reorganization of motor function: studies on series of monkeys of various ages from infancy to maturity. Arch Neurol Psychiat 48: 227–240Google Scholar
  18. Leong SK (1978 a) Plasticity of cerebellar efferents after neonatal lesions in albino rats. Neurosci Lett 7: 281–289Google Scholar
  19. Leong SK (1978 b) Effects of deafferenting cerebellar or cerebral inputs to the pontine and red nuclei in the albino rat. Brain Res 155: 357–361Google Scholar
  20. Leong SK (1980) A qualitative electron microscopic study of the corticopontine projections after neonatal cerebellar hemispherectomy. Brain Res 96: 133–154Google Scholar
  21. Lim KH, Leong SK (1975) Aberrant bilateral projections from the dentate and interposed nucleus in albino rats after neonatal lesions. Brain Res 96: 306–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Massion J (1967) The mammalian red nucleus. Physiol Rev 47: 383–436PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Naus CG, Flumerfelt BA, Hrycyshyn AW (1984) Topographic specificity of aberrant cerebello rubral projections following neonatal hemicerebellectomy in the rat. Brain Res 309: 1–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. O’Donoghue DL, Kartje-Tillotson G, Neafsey EJ, Castro AJ (1986) A study of forelimb movements evoked by intracortical microstimulation after hemicerebellectomy in newborn, young and adult rats. Brain Res 385: 311–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. O’Donoghue DL, Kartje-Tillotson G, Castro AJ (1987) Forelimb motor cortical projections in normal rats and after neonatal hemicerebellectomy: an anatomical study based upon the axonal transport of WGA/HRP. J Comp Neurol 256: 274–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Oppenheim RW (1981) Neuronal cell death and some related regressive phenomena during neurogenesis: a selective historical review and progress report. In: Cowan WM (ed) Studies in developmental neurobiology: essays in honor of Viktor Hamburger. Oxford UP, Oxford, pp 74–133Google Scholar
  27. Povlishock JT, Taylor JT, Seiber HR (1978) Electron-microscopic study of the maturing rat red nucleus. I. The large-neuron polulation, Acta Anat 102: 129–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rager G, Rager U (1978) Systems matching by degeneration. I. A quantitative electron microscopic study of the generation and degeneration of retinal ganglion cells in the chicken. Exp Brain Res 33: 65–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schneider GE, Jhaveri SR (1974) Neuroanatomical correlates of spared or altered function after brain lesions in the newborn hamster. In: Stein DG, Rosen JJ, Butters N (eds) Plasticity and recovery of function in the central nervous system. Academic Press, London, pp 65–109Google Scholar
  30. Shieh JY, Leong SK, Wong WC (1985) An electron microscopic study of the corticorubral fibres after neonatal deep cerebellar nuclear lesions in albino rats. Brain Res 335: 201–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith RL, Parks T, Lynch G (1974) A comparison of the role of the motor cortex in recovery from cerebellar damage in young and adult rats. Behav Biol 12: 177–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Swenson RS, Castro AJ (1982) Plasticity of meso-diencephalic projections to the inferior olive following neonatal hemicerebellectomy in rats. Brain Res 244: 169–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsukahara N, Fujito Y, Kubota M (1983) Specificity of the newly-formed corticorubral synapses in the kitten red nucleus. Exp Brain Res 51: 45–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Voogd J, Gerrits NM, Marani E (1985) Cerebellum. In: Paxinos G (ed) The rat nervous system, vol 2. Academic Press, London, pp 251–291Google Scholar
  35. Yamamoto T, Kawaguchi S, Samejima A (1981) Electrophysiological studies on plasticity of cerebello thalamic neurons in rats following neonatal hemicerebellectomy. Jpn J Physiol 31: 217–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Gramsbergen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Developmental NeurologyGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations