Limits of Applicability of the Popcorn Model for Desorption of Large Biomolecules by Fast Ion Impact

  • P. Williams
  • B. U. R. Sundqvist
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Surface Sciences book series (SSSUR, volume 13)


The popcorn model, introduced to explain fast ion desorption of intact, large biomolecules, is discussed with particular reference to desorption of low mass and very high mass molecules. In the model, desorption of a large biomolecule is shown to result from rapid expansion of the molecule, following excitation of most vibrational modes by the intense low-energy electron flux emanating from the primary ion track. It is shown that the popcorn effect can readily induce desorption of individual molecules as light as 500 u, and also that the high mass limit for desorption may lie beyond that presently attained. It is argued that desorption of molecules with molecular weights as high as 105 might be possible by fast heavy ion impact.


Large Molecule Vibrational Excitation Ejection Velocity Large Biomolecule Intramolecular Bond 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    P. Williams and B. Sundqvist, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 (1987) 1031Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R.D. Macfarlane and D.F. Torgerson, Science, 191 (1976) 920CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Sundqvist, Unpublished.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. Sundqvist, A. Hedin, P. Hakansson, M. Salehpour, G. Save, S. Widdyasekera, and R.E. Johnson, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., B14 (1986) 429CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Linder, in “Electronic and Atomic Collisions”, edited by G. Watel ( North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978 ), p. 51Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D.J. Barlow and J.M. Thornton, J. Mol. Biol. 168 (1983) 867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Hedin, P. Hakansson, B. Sundqvist, and R.E. Johnson, Phys. Rev. B31 (1985) 1780Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Y. Suezaki and N. Go, Int. J. Pept.Protein Res. 7 (1975) 333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Bolbach, S. Della-Negra, C. Deprun, Y. Le Beyec, and K.G. Standing, Rapid. Comm. Mass Spectrom. 1 (1987) 22Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. Lucchese, Texas A & M University. Private communication.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Sundqvist, A. Hedin, P. Hakansson, G. Jonsson, M. Salehour, G. Save, S. Widdiyasekera and T. Roepstorff, in “Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Ion Formation from Organic Solids”, edited by A. Benninghoven, Springer Proceedings in Physics Vol 9, ( Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986 )Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D.E. David, T.F. Magnera, R. Tian, J. Stulik and J. Michl, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B14 (1986) 378CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    P.T. Murray and J.W. Rabalais, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 103 (1981) 1007Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Williams
    • 1
  • B. U. R. Sundqvist
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Division of Ion Physics, Department of Radiation SciencesUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations