Skip to main content

Flow Cytometry in the Management of Breast Cancer

  • Chapter
High-Risk Breast Cancer

Abstract

There is a pressing need for the further definition of prognostic factors capable of defining the clinical course of patients with primary breast cancer. Current data suggest that approximately 50% of women will present with node-negative (N -) disease, 35% with node-positive (N + ) disease, and 15% with metastases [37]. Of these patients, 25% with N - and 60% with N + will develop locally recurrent or metastatic disease over a 10-year follow-up period. Adjuvant chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy following primary treatment provides potentially curative treatment for an additional 10%–25% of patients with N+ disease, and current trials suggest benefit in N- patients [35]. For patients with primary operable breast cancer, a continuing clinical dilemma related to the use of adjuvant therapy is the need to treat all patients of a given stage in order to provide effective treatment for only a small proportion of the population. Although tumor size, histologic grade, and steroid receptor status provide information suggesting recurrence risk for large groups of patients, there remains no satisfactory tool for accurate prediction of recurrence in the individual.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adami HO, Killander D (1984) Prediction of survival in breast cancer - a review. Acta Chir Scand 519: 25–34

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Auer G, Eriksson E, Azavedo E, Caspersson T, Wallgren A (1984) Prognostic significance of nuclear DNA content in mammary adenocarcinoma in humans. Cancer Res 44: 394–396

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Azzopardi JP, Chepick OF, Hartmann WH, Jafarey NA, Llombart-Bosch A, Ozzello L, Rilke F, Sassano N, Sobin LH, Sommers SC, Stalsberg H, Sugar J, Williams HO (1982) The World Health Organization histological typing of breast tumors - second edition. Am J Clin Pathol 78: 806–816

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baisch H, Goehde W, Linden WA (1985) Analysis of PCP-data to determine the fraction of cells in the various phases of cell cycle. Radiat Environ Biophys 12: 31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barlogie B, Raber MN, Schumann J, Johnson TS, Drewinko B, Swartzendruber DE, Gohde W, Andreeff M, Freireich EJ (1983) Flow cytometry in clinical cancer research. Cancer Res 43: 3982–3997

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cornelisse CJ, Moolenaar AJ, Kooyman HJ (1985) Aneuploidy and survival in 566 breast cancer cases. International Conference on Analytical Cytometry XI. Hilton Head, SC, Abst. 340

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coulson PB, Thornthwaite JT, Woolley TW, Sugarbaker EV, Seckinger D, (1984) Prognostic indicators including DNA histogram type, receptor content, and staging related to human breast cancer patient survival. Cancer Res 44: 4187–4196

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cox DR: (1972) Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B 34: 187–220

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deshpande N, Mitchell I, Allen D, Morris R (1983) DNA content of carcinomas and prognosis in human breast cancer. Int J Cancer 32: 693–696

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dressier L, Clark G, Owens M, Pounds G, Oldaker T, McGuire W (1987) DNA flow cytometry predicts for relapse in node negative breast cancer patients. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 6:57 (Abst)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ewers SB, Langstrom E, Baldetorp B, Killander D (1984) Flow cytometric DNA analysis in primary breast carcinomas and clinicopathological correlations. Cytometry 5: 408– 419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fisher ER, Gregorio RM, Fisher B (1985) The pathology of invasive breast cancer. Cancer 36: 1–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fisher B, Fisher ER, Redmond C (1986) Ten-year results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) clinical trial evaluating the use of L-phenylalanine mustard (l-PAM) in the management of primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 4: 929–941

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fried J (1976) Method for the quantitative evaluation of data from flow microfluorometry. Comput Biomed Res 9: 263–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fried J, Perez AG, Clarkson BD (1976) Flow cytometric analysis of cell cycle distribution using propidium iodide. J Cell Biol 71: 172–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Friedlander ML, Hedley DW, Taylor IW (1984) Clinical and biological significance of aneuploidy in human tumors - a review. J Clin Pathol 37: 961–974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hedley DW, Friedlander ML, Taylor IW (1983) Method for analysis of cellular DNA content of paraffin-embedded pathological material using flow cytometry. J Histochem Cytochem 31: 1333–1335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hedley DW, Friedlander ML, Taylor IW (1985) Application of DNA flow cytometry to paraffin-embedded archival material for the study of aneuploidy and its clinical significance. Cytometry 6: 327–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hedley DW, Rugg CA, Gelber RD (1987) Association of DNA index and S-phase fraction with prognosis of nodes positive early breast cancer. Cancer Res 47:4729–4735

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kallioniemi O-P, Hietanen T, Mattila J, Lehtinen M, Lauslahti K, Koivula T (1987) Aneuploid DNA content and high S-phase fraction of tumour cells are related to poor prognosis in patients with primary breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 23: 277–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Klintenberg C, Stal O, Nordenskjold B, Wallgren A, Arvidsson S, Skoog L (1986) Proliferative index, cytosol estrogen receptor and axillary node status as prognostic predictors in human mammary carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat (Suppl) 7: 99–106

    Google Scholar 

  22. Klintenberg C, Wallgren A, Bjelkenkrantz K, Carstenssen J, Humla S, Nordenskjold B, Skoog L et al (1985) DNA distribution, cytosol estrogen receptors and axillary nodes as prognostic predictors in breast cancer. Acta Radiol (Oncol) 24: 253–258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kute TE, Huske MS, Shore A, Rhyne AL (1980) Improvements in steroid receptor assays including rapid computer analysis of data. Anal Biochem 103: 272–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kute, TE, Muss HB, Hopkins M, Marshall R, Case D, Kammire L (1985) Relationship of flow cytometry results to clinical and steroid receptor status in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 6: 113–121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Masters JR, Camplejohn RS, Millis RR, Rubens RD (1987) Histological grade, elastosis, DNA ploidy and the response to chemotherapy of breast cancer. Br J Cancer 55: 455–457

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. McDivitt RW, Stone KR, Craig RB, Palmer JO, Meyer JS, Bauer WC (1986) A proposed classification of breast cancer based on kinetic information. Cancer 57: 269–276

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. McDivitt RW, Stone KR, Meyer JS (1984) A method for dissociation of viable human breast cancer cells that produces flow cytometric information similar to that obtained by thymidine labeling. Cancer Res 44: 2628–2633

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Meyer JS, Friedman E, McCrate M, Baur WC (1983) Prediction of early course of breast cancer by thymidine labeling. Cancer 51: 1879–1886

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Meyer JS, Lee JY (1980) Relationship of S-phase fraction of breast carcinoma in relapse to duration of remission, estrogen receptor content, therapeutic responsiveness, and duration of survival. Cancer Res 40: 1890–1896

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mitchell I, Deshpande N, Millis R, Rubins R (1985) Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) content of primary carcinoma and response to endocrine or cytotoxic drug therapies in patients with advanced breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 11: 251–256

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Moran RE, Black MM, Alpert L, Straus MJ (1984) Correlation of cell-cycle kinetics, hormone receptors, histopathology, and nodal status in human breast cancer. Cancer 54: 1586–1590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Muss HB (1984) Principles of cancer chemotherapy; In: Deppe G (ed) Chemotherapy of gynecologic malignancy. Liss, New York, pp 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  33. Olszewki W, Darzynkiewicz Z, Rosen PP, Schwartz MD, Meleamed MR (1981) Flow cytometry of breast carcinoma: 1. Relation of DNA ploidy level to histology and estrogen receptor. Cancer 48: 980–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Owainati AA, Robins RA, Hinton C, Ellis IO, Dowle CS, Ferry B, Elston CW, Blamey RW, Baldwin RW (1987) Tumour aneuploidy, prognostic parameters and survival in primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer 55: 449–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Proceedings of the NIH development conference on adjuvant chemotherapy and endocrine therapy for breast cancer. (1986) NCI Monogr 1:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  36. Retsky MW, Swartzendruber DE, Wardell RH: (1985) Predicting the disease free survival of breast cancer patients using DNA index and a stochastic numerical model of breast cancer growth. International Conference on Analytical Cytometry XI. Hilton Head, SC, abst 343

    Google Scholar 

  37. Silverberg E (1987) Cancer statistics. CA 37: 2–19

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Silvestrini R, Daidone MG, Costa A, Sanfilippo O (1985) Cell kinetics and in vitro chemosensitivity as a tool for improved management of patients. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 21: 371–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Silvestrini R, Daidone G, Gasporini G (1985) Cell kinetics as a prognostic marker in node-negative breast cancer. Cancer 56: 1982–1987

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Stal O, Klintenberg C, Franzen G, Risberg B, Arvidsson S, Bjelken-Krantz K, Skoog L, Nordenskjold B (1986) A comparison of static cytofluorometry and flow cytometry for the estimation of ploidy and DNA-replication in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 7: 15–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Taylor IW, Musgrove EA, Friedlander ML, Foo MS, Hedley DW (1983) The influence of age on the DNA ploidy levels of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 19: 623–628

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Thornthwaite JT, Sugarbaker EV, Temple WJ (1980) Preparation of tissue for DNA flow cytometric analysis. Cytometry 1: 229–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Thorud E, Fossa SD, Vaage S, Kaalhus O, Knudsen OS, Bremer O, Shoaib MC (1986) Primary breast cancer: Flow cytometric DNA pattern in relation to clinical and histopathologic characteristics. Cancer 57: 808–811

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Tubiana M, Pejovic MJ, Renaud A, Contesso G, Chavaudra N, Gioanni J, Malaise EP (1981) Kinetic parameters and the course of the disease in breast cancer. Cancer 47: 937–943

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Muss, H.B., Kute, T.E. (1989). Flow Cytometry in the Management of Breast Cancer. In: Ragaz, J., Ariel, I.M. (eds) High-Risk Breast Cancer. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73718-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73718-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-73720-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-73718-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics