Advertisement

Appreciation of Metaphoric and Connotative Word Meaning by Brain-Damaged Patients

  • Hiram H. Brownell

Abstract

Language is often discussed in terms of separate parts, including the phonological, syntactic, and lexical components of the grammar. These components differ with respect to their connections to other domains of cognition. Unlike the other components, the lexicon, which contains a speaker’s knowledge of individual words, represents a bridge between world knowledge and the language system. Words in the lexicon are linked to associated meanings that include a wealth of information about the world and that pertain to virtually all realms of a person’s experience. In what follows, the term lexical semantics will be used to refer to the lexicon plus the range of associations that are often excluded from the lexicon proper (e.g., Emmorey and Fromkin, in press).

Keywords

Word Meaning Normal Control Subject Literal Meaning Alternative Meaning Semantic Domain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown RW (1958) Words and things. Free Press Glencoe, ILGoogle Scholar
  2. Brownell HH, Potter HH, Michelow D, Gardner G (1984) Sensitivity to lexical denotation and connotation in brain-damaged patients: a double dissociation? Brain Lang 22: 253–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brownell HH, Potter HH, Bihrle AM, Gardner H (1986) Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients. Brain Lang 21: 310–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brownell HH, Simpson TL, Bihrle AM, Potter HH, Gardner H (submitted) Appreciation of metaphoric alternative word meanings by left and right brain-damaged patientsGoogle Scholar
  5. Burgess C, Simpson GB (1988) Cerebral hemispheric mechanisms in the retrieval of ambig-uous word meanings. Brain Lang 33: 86–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caramazza A, Hersh HM, Torgerson WS (1976) Subjective structures and operations in semantic memory. J Verb Learn Verb Behav 15: 103–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chiarello C (in press) Lateralization of lexical processes in the normal brain: a review of visual half-field research. In: Whitaker HA (ed) Contemporary reviews in neuropsychology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiarello C, Senehi J, Nuding S (1987) Semantic priming with abstract and concrete words: differential asymmetry may be postlexical. Brain Lang 31: 43–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark HH (1970) Word associations and linguistic theory. In: Lyons J (ed) New horizons in linguistics. Penguin, Baltimore, pp 271–286Google Scholar
  10. Clark HH, Clark EV (1977) Psychology and language. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Emmorey KD, Fromkin VA (in press) The mental lexicon. In: Newmeyer F (ed) Linguistics: the Cambridge survey, vol 4. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Etcoff NL (1984) Perceptual and conceptual organization of facial emotions: hemispheric differences. Brain Cogn 3: 385–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Etcoff NL (1985) The neuropsychology of emotional expression. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Cognitive Science Occasional Paper no 31Google Scholar
  14. Foldi NS (1987) Appreciation of pragmatic interpretations of indirect commands: comparison of right and left brain-damaged patients. Brain Lang 31: 88–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gardner H, Denes G (1973) Connotative judgements by aphasic patients on a pictorial adaptation of the semantic differential. Cortex 9: 183–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Glucksberg S, Gildea P, Bookin HB (1982) On understanding nonliteral speech: can people ignore metaphors? J Verb Lern Verb Behav 21: 85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hartigan J (1981) P1 M cluster analysis of variables. In: Dixon WJ (chief ed) BMDP statistical software. University of California Press, Berkeley CA, pp 448–455Google Scholar
  18. Heilman KM, Bowers D, Valenstein E (1985) Emotional disorders associated with neurological diseases. In: Heilman KM, Valenstein E (eds) Clinical neuropsychology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 377–402Google Scholar
  19. Hirst W, LeDoux J, Stein S (1984) Constraints on the processing of indirect speech acts: evidence from aphasiology. Brain Lang 23: 26–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Keil FC (1979) Semantic and conceptual development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  21. Kempler D, Van Lancker D, Hadler B (1984) Familiar phrase recognition in brain-damaged and demented adults. Academy of Aphasia, Santa Monica, CAGoogle Scholar
  22. Lesser R (1978) Psycholinguistic investigations of aphasia. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Lyons J (1968) Introduction to theoretical linguistics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. McCloskey M, Glucksberg S (1979) Decision processes in verifying membership statements: implications for models of semantic memory. Cogn Psychol 11: 1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Miller GA (1979) Images and models, similes and metaphors. In: Ortony A (ed) Metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 202–250Google Scholar
  26. Myers PS, Linebaugh CW (1981) Comprehension of idiomatic expressions by right-hemisphere-damaged adults. In: Brookshire RH (ed) Clinical aphasiology: conference proceedings. BRK, Minneapolis, pp 254–261Google Scholar
  27. Ortony A (ed) (1979) Metaphor and thought. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Ortony A, Reynolds RE, Arter JR (1978) Metaphor: theoretical and empirical research. Psychol Bull 85: 919–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Osgood CE (1960) The cross-cultural generality of visual-verbal synesthetic tendencies. Behav Sci 5: 146–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Osgood CE, Suci GJ, Tannenbaum PH (1957) The measurement of meaning. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, ILGoogle Scholar
  31. Palmer FR (1976) Semantics. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Rips LJ, Shoben EJ, Smith EE (1973) Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations. J Verb Lern Verb Behav 12: 1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rosch E, Simpson C, Miller RS (1976) Structural bases of typicality effects. J Exp Psychol [Hum Percept] 2: 491–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Simpson GB (1984) Lexical ambiguity and its role in models of word recognition. Psychol Bull 96: 316–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith EE, Shoben EJ, Rips LJ (1974) Structure and process in semantic memory: a model for semantic decisions. Psychol Rev 81: 214–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stachowiak FJ, Huber W, Poeck K, Kerschensteiner M (1977) Text comprehension in aphasia. Brain Lang 4: 177–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 18: 643–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tucker DM (1981) Lateral brain function, emotion, and conceptualization. Psychol Bull 89: 19–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Winner E, Gardner H (1977) The comprehension of metaphor in brain-damaged patients. Brain 100: 719–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zurif EB, Caramazza A, Myerson R, Galvin J (1974) Semantic feature representations for normal and aphasic language. Brain Lang 1: 167–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiram H. Brownell

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations