Advertisement

Histomorphometry of Free Cortical Bone Autograft Incorporation. Comparison Between Autografted and Allografted Segmental Cortical Bone

  • C. Delloye
Conference paper

Abstract

Bone grafting plays a key role in the reconstruction of skeletal defects. Contrary to metallic implant, it provides biological fixation for soft tissue and is progressively anchored to the host bone. Although autograft remains the best grafting material, its supply is often limited in extensive bone loss so that the use of an allograft is mandatory in the management of severe bone defect. In the search of an effective bone substitute to cortical bone defects, the natural history of the cortical bone auto- and allograft incorporation must first be assessed. The aim of this study was to delineate a general pattern of autografted cortical bone healing and to compare it to the incorporation of different bone allografts, including HCl-demineralized segmental bone.

Keywords

Cortical Bone Bone Graft Demineralized Bone Matrix Resorption Cavity Balance Incomplete Block Design 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burchardt H, Jones H, Glowczewskie F, Rudner G, Enneking WF (1978) Freeze-dried allogeneic segmental cortical bone grafts in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 60A:1082–1090Google Scholar
  2. Cornell CN, Lane JM, Nottebaert M, Klein C, Burstein AM (1987) The effect of ethylene-oxide sterilization upon the bone inductive properties of demineralized bone matrix. Trans Orthop Res Soc 12:359Google Scholar
  3. Delloye C, Hebrant A, Munting E, Piret L, Coutelier L (1985) The osteoinductive capacity of differently HCl-decalcified bone alloimplants. Acta Orthop Scand 56:318–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Delloye C, Coutelier L, Vincent A (1986) Canine cortical bone autograft remodeling in two simultaneous skeletal sites. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 105:79–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Enneking WF, Burchardt H, Puhl JJ, Piotrowski G (1975) Physical and biological aspects of repair in dog cortical bone transplants. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 57A:237–252Google Scholar
  6. Munting E, Wilmart J, Wijne A, Hennebert P, Delloye C (1987) Effect of sterilization on osteoinduction. Acta Orthop Scand 59:34–38Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Delloye

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations