Skip to main content

Foeniculum vulgare Miller: Cell Culture, Regeneration, and the Production of Anethole

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry ((AGRICULTURE,volume 7))

Abstract

Fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Miller) belongs to the Umbelliferae family and was originally found around the Mediterranean Basin. It has long been cultivated and introduced into many regions outside of that zone and has become naturalized in some of them. Although it can bear widely different climates and be cultivated in cold climates as well as in tropical regions, it develops best in temperate climates. In the Mediterranean climate, wild fennel often grows densely, with a potentiality of invading crops. In some areas where it has become naturalized, as in California for example, it has spread so much that in some cases it has become a weed (Bailey 1930). As in most UmbeUiferae, the plant has secretory canals in all the organs (Kadry et al. 1978) and produces an essential oil rich in aromatic components. The chief constituent of the essence is anethole (Fig. 1), which gives the plant its anise fragrance, but it also contains, in variable quantities, other elements, such as fenchone, estragole, anisaldehyde and terpenes (d-pinene, α-d-phellandrene, camphene) (Vlahov et al. 1964; Fujita et al. 1980). The genus Foeniculum is monospecific, and is represented only by the vulgare species. The latter, however, has been split into two subspecies: ssp. piperitum (Ucria) Coutinho and ssp. capillaceum (Gilib.) Holmboe (Hegi 1966). Foeniculum vulgare ssp. piperitum is a perennial type of fennel that only grows wild and can be differentiated from ssp. capillaceum by its short and rigid lobed leaves, as well as by a small number of rays in the umbels and by its very bitter fruit. The ssp. capillaceum, on the contrary, is characterized by long and supple lobed leaves as well as by a large number of rays in the umbels and less bitter fruit. In the latter subspecies, three varieties are usually distinguished. The variety vulgare (Miller) Thellung (Foeniculum vulgare Miller) (bitter fennel) comprises a group of perennial plants with rather long fruit having a more or less bitter taste. The variety dulce (Miller) Thellung (=Foeniculum dulce Miller = Foeniculum panmorium DC.) (sweet fennel), on the contrary, consists of annuals, exceptionally biannuals, with smaller fruit, whose sweet taste is a result of the low fenchone content in the essential oil (Osisiogu 1967; Betts 1968). The variety azoricum (Miller) Thellung (=Foeniculum azoricum Miller) (Italian fennel, Florence fennel), probably stemming from one of the above varieties by horticultural selection, also consists of annuals producing small sweet fruit. In these plants, however, young leaves of the rosette have hypertrophied and thick sheaves that form a “bulb” similar to that of celery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aloi B, Garibaldi A (1978) Esperienze di lotta in Campania contro la Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) De Bary agente di un marciume del grumolo del finocchio. Ann Fac Sci Agric Univ Stud Napoli 12: 213–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badoc A (1982) Contribution à l’étude des phénomènes d’organogenèse et de callogenèse de tissus de Fenouil vulgaire (Foeniculum vulgare subsp. capillaceum var. vulgare (Mill.) Thellung) cultivés in vitro; analyse des constituants de l’huile essentielle des explants. DEA Lille Univ, Fr, 74 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey LH (1930) The standard cyclopedia of horticulture, vol 2. MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajaj YPS (1983) In vitro production of haploids. In: Evans DA, Sharp WR, Ammirato PV, Yamada Y eds Handbook of plant cell culture, vol 1. MacMillan, New York, 228–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajaj YPS, Furmanowa M, Olszowska O (1988) Biotechnology of the micropropagation of medicinal and aromatic plants. In: Bajaj YPS ed Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, vol 4. Medicinal and aromatic plants I. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo, 60–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker H (1970) Untersuchungen zur Frage der Bildung flüchtiger Stoffwechselprodukte in Calluskulturen. Biochem Physiol Pflanzen 161: 425–441.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Betts TJ (1968) Examination of fennel fruits by gas chromatography without preliminary distillation. J Pharm Pharmacol 20 (Suppl): 61S–64S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bianco VV (1981) Influence of “taproot” size on “seed” yield of Florence fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill. var. dulce Mill.). Acta Hortic 111: 183–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth AB, Autenrieth JS (1969) Terpenes and terpenoids. In: Kirk-Othmer, Encyclopedia of chemical technology, vol 19, 2nd edn. pp 803-838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bougeard M, Vegh I (1980) Etude préliminaire sur le Cercosporidium punctum (Lacroix) Deighton, agent de la “cercosporidiose” du fenouil (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.). Cryptogam Mycol 1: 205–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brillanceau MH (1986) Culture in vitro de racines transformées par Agrobacterium rhizogenes, pt 2. Thesis, Paris Sud Univ, Fr, 227 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browers MA, Orton TJ (1982) Transmission of gross chromosomal variability from suspension cultures into regenerated celery plants. J Hered 73: 159–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilton MD, Tepfer DA, Petit A, David C, Casse-Delbart F, Tempé J (1982) Agrobacterium rhizogenes inserts T-DNA into the genomes of the host plant root cells. Nature (London) 295: 432–434.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chingova-Boyadjieva B (1969) On the biology of flowering in perennial fennel and results from hybridization. Rast Nauk 6: 49–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Amato F (1985) Cytogenetics of plant cell and tissue cultures and their regenerates. CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci 3: 73–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmarest P (1978) New aspects of fennel cultivation in France. Acta Hortic 73: 289–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudits D, Kao KN, Constabel F, Gamborg OL (1976) Embryogenesis and formation of tetraploid and hexaploid plants from carrot protoplasts. Can J Bot 54: 1063–1067.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Du Manoir J, Vegh I (1981) Phomopsis foeniculi spec. nov. sur Fenouil (Foeniculum vulgare Mill.). Phytopathol Z 100: 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Manoir J, Desmarest P, Saussay R (1985) In vitro propagation of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Miller). Sci Hortic 27: 15–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egorova NA, Reznikova SA (1982) Investigation of isolated anther culture in connection with induction of androgenesis in coriander. Fiziol Rast 29: 142–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita SI, Asami Y, Nozaki K (1980) The constituents of the essential oils from Foeniculum vulgare Miller. J Agric Chem Soc Jpn 54: 765–767.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Rodriguez MJ, Paupardin C, Saussay R (1978) Sur la formation d’un tissu sécréteur et la synthèse d’anéthole par des tissus de Fenouil (Foeniculum vulgare Mill. var. Dulce) cultivés in vitro. CR Acad Sci Paris 287: 693–696.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta SC (1962) Development of exembryonate seeds in Foeniculum vulgare Mill. Plant embryology. Symp, CSIR, New Delhi, pp 188–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halperin W (1970) Embryos from somatic plant cells. In: Padykula HA ed Control mechanisms in the expression of cellular phenotypes. Academic Press, London New York, 169–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halperin W, Wetherell DF (1965) Ammonium requirement for embryogenesis in vitro. Nature (London) 205: 519–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman CL, Coy JJM, Knous TR (1984) Selection of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) cell lines and regeneration for plants resistant to the toxin(s) produced by Fusarium oxysporum sp. medicaginis. Plant Sci Lett 34: 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegi G (1966) Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa, Bd 5, 2. Hauser, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller R (1953) Recherches sur la nutrition minérale des tissus végétaux cultivés in vitro. Ann Sci Nat Bot Biol Vég 14: 1–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hore A (1976) Cytogenetical studies of the genus Foeniculum (Umbelliferae). Indian Agric 20: 183–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hore A (1979) Improvement of minor (Umbelliferous) spices in India. Econ Bot 33: 290–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunault G (1981) La culture in vitro des tissus de Fenouil (Foeniculum vulgare Miller). Premières observations sur le comportement des explantats primitifs et des cals. CR Acad Sci Paris 293: 553–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunault G (1984) In vitro culture of fennel tissues (Foeniculum vulgare Miller) from cell suspension to mature plant. Sci Hortic 22: 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunault G (1987) Etat cytogénétique des plantes de Fenouil (Foeniculum vulgare Miller) obtenues par embryogenèse somatique à partir de suspensions cellulaires polyploïdes. Rev Cytol Biol Vég 10: 155–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichihara A, Oikawa H, Hashimoto M, Sakamura S, Haraguchi T, Nagano H (1983) A Phytotoxin, betaenone C and its metabolites of Phoma betae. Ir Agric Biol Chem 47: 2965–2967.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johri BM, Seghal CB (1966) Growth responses of ovaries of Anethum, Foeniculum and Trachyspermum. Phytomorphology 16:364–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadry A, Tewfic HA, Habib SA (1978) Morphology and distribution of glandular structures in Foeniculum vulgare. Mill. Egypt J Hortic 5: 13–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamada H, Harada H (1979a) Studies on the organogenesis in carrot tissue cultures. I. Effects of growth regulators on somatic embryogenesis and root formation. Z Pflanzenphysiol 91: 255–266.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kamada H, Harada H (1979b) Studies on the organogenesis in carrot tissue cultures. II. Effects of amino acids and inorganic nitrogenous compounds on somatic embryogenesis. Z Pflanzenphysiol 91: 453–463.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kato H, Takeuchi M (1966) Embryogenesis from the epidermal cells of carrot hypocotyl. Sci Pap Coll Gen Educ (Tokyo) 16: 245–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsmaier EM, Skoog F (1965) Organic growth factor requirements of tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 18: 100–127.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maheshwari SC, Gupta GRP (1965) Production of adventitious embryoids in vitro from stem callus of Foeniculum vulgare. Planta 67:384–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masuda K, Kikuta Y, Okazawa Y (1981) A revision of the medium for somatic embryogenesis in carrot suspension culture. J Fac Agric Hokkaido Univ 60: 184–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Merck Index (1976) 9th edn. Windholz M (ed). Merck, Rahway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miura Y, Tabata M (1986) Direct somatic embryogenesis from protoplasts of Foeniculum vulgare. Plant Cell Rep 5: 310–313.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Molleken RG, Bauer KA (1980) Méthode en deux étapes pour la synthèse de 1’ Anéthol. Bios 7-8:4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton JF (1977) Major medicinal plants. Botany, culture and uses. Thomas, Springfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouras A, Lutz J (1973) Sur les variations du comportement organogène des cultures de tissus de Carotte sauvage produisant des pseudo-embryons. CR Acad Sci Paris 277: 1151–1153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nitsch JP (1951) Growth and development in vitro of excised ovaries. Am J Bot 38: 566–577.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osisiogu IUW (1967) Essential oils of Nigeria. Part II: A study of the oil of fennel produced at Nsukka. Planta Med 15: 30–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paris RR, Moyse H (1967) Précis de matière médicale, Tome 2. Masson, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paupardin C (1976) Sur la différenciation d’un tissu sécréteur et la formation d’huile essentielle par des tissus végétaux cultivés in vitro. Actes 101e Congr Soc Savantes, Lille, Fr, pp 629-641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paupardin C, Garcia-Rodriguez MJ, Bricout J (1980) Multiplication végétative de quelques plantes aromatiques: problèmes posés par la production d’essence. CR Acad Agric Fr 66: 658–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peron JY (1981) Le Fenouil: une production déficitaire en France à promouvoir sous abris. PHM Rev Hortic 217: 21–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purseglove JW (1977) Tropical crops. Dicotyledons. Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quagliotti L, Accati E, Milanesio M (1968) Preliminary report on a functional type of male-sterility in fennel. Genet Agric 23: 359–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghuvanshi SS, Joshi S (1966) Foeniculum vulgare: Polyploidy, translocation heterozygosity and pollen variability, pt 1: Cytology. Cytologia 31: 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanujam S, Tewari VP (1970) Heterosis breeding in fennel. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 30: 732–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanujam S, Joshi BS, Saxena MBL (1964) Extent and randomness of cross pollination in some umbelliferous spices of India. Ind J Genet Plant Breed 24: 62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranga Swamy NS (1961) Experimental studies on female reproductive structures of Citrus microcarpa Bunge. Phytomorphology 11: 109–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichling J, Becker H, Martin R, Burkhardt G (1985) Vergleichende Untersuchungen zur Bildung und Akkumulation von ätherischem Öl in der intakten Pflanze und in Zellkulturen von Pimpinella anisum L. Z Naturforsch 40c:465–468.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reinert J, Bajaj YPS (eds) (1977) Anther culture: Haploid production and its significance. In: Applied and fundamental aspects of plant cell, tissue, and organ culture. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 251–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinert J, Tazawa M (1969) Wirkung von Stickstoffverbindungen und von Auxin auf die Embryogenese in Gewebekulturen. Planta 87: 239–248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seghai CB (1964) Artificial induction of polyembryony in Foeniculum vulgare Mill. Curr Sci 33: 373–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seghai CB (1972a) In vitro polyembryony in Ammi majus L. Curr Sci 41: 263–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seghai CB (1972b) Experimental induction of zygotic multiple embryos in Coriandrum sativum L. Indian J Exp Biol 10: 457–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah RR, Dalai KC (1980) In vitro multiplication of Glycyrrhiza. Curr Sci 49: 69–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma AK, Bhattacharyya NK (1959) Further investigations on several genera of Umbelliferae and their interrelationships. Genetica 30: 1–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp WR, Evans DA, Sondahl MR (1982) Application of somatic embryogenesis to crop improvement. In: Fujiwara A ed Plant tissue culture 1982. Maruzen, Tokyo, 759–762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simard MH (1985) Méthodologies de sélection de plants de Fenouil amer (Foeniculum vulgare) tolérants au Phomopsis foeniculi et à ses principes toxiques. Rapport de stage, Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Horticulture, Versailles, Fr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisto D (1983) Cercosporidium punctum (Lacroix) Deighton su finocchio (Foeniculum vulgare Mill, var. Azoricum Thell.) in Italia meridionale. Inf Fitopathol 33: 55–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith SM, Street HE (1974) The decline of embryogenic potential as callus and suspension cultures of carrot (Daucus carota L.) are serially subcultured. Ann Bot (London) 38: 223–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svab J (1978) Problems and results of Foeniculum vulgare cultivation in large-scale production in Hungary. Acta Hortic 73: 297–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tazawa M, Reinert J (1969) Extracellular and intracellular chemical environments in relation to embryogenesis in vitro. Protoplasma 68: 157–173.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tepfer D (1982) La transformation génétique de plantes supérieures par Agrobacterium rhizogenes. 2e Coll Recherches fruitières, Bordeaux, Fr, pp 47-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepfer DA, Tempé J (1981) Production d’agropine par des racines formées sous l’action d’Agrobacterium rhizogenes, souche A4. CR Acad Sci Paris 292: 153–156.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vlahov R, Ognyanov I, Tsankova E (1964) Composition of Bulgarian essential oil from Foeniculum dulce Mill. fruit. CR Acad Bulg Sci 17: 569–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell DF, Dougall DK (1976) Sources of nitrogen supporting growth and embryogenesis in cultured wild carrot tissue. Physiol Plant 37: 97–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hunault, G., Desmarest, P., Du Manoir, J. (1989). Foeniculum vulgare Miller: Cell Culture, Regeneration, and the Production of Anethole. In: Bajaj, Y.P.S. (eds) Medicinal and Aromatic Plants II. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, vol 7. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73617-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73617-9_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-73619-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-73617-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics