Advertisement

Criteria for Evaluating the Screening Efficacy for Cervical Cancer: Estimated Sensitivity and Protective Effect of the Screening Program of Florence

  • S. Cecchini

Abstract

Recently, case control studies have been employed to study the “protection” offered by Pap screening against cervical cancer. This method has been proved to be effective for evaluating screening efficacy [1, 3]. The case control study performed by our Center (CSPO), whose preliminary results will be presented here, differs from previous studies in that the information about the screening histories of patients and controls is taken from the computerized archives of the CSPO instead of being assessed by interviews. Thus, the exact data and diagnosis of every Pap test are known.

Keywords

Cervical Cancer Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Invasive Cervical Cancer Interval Cancer Protection Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Berrino F, Gatta G, d’Alto M, Crosignani P, Riboli E (1986) Efficacy of screening in preventing invasive cervical cancer: a case control study in Milan, Italy. In: Hakama M, Miller AB, Day NE (eds) Screening for cancer of the uterine cervix. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (IARC scientific pulications, no 76)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cecchini S, Palli D, Casini A (1985) Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III: an estimate of screening error rates and optimal screening interval. Acta Cytol (Baltimore) 29: 329–333Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clarke EA, Anderson TW (1979) Does screening by “pap” smears help prevent cervical cancer? Lancet II: 1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duca P, Turolla E, Galli C (1986) Effîcacia dello screening di massa mediante Pap-test: validità e utilità di un indicatore di copertura. Epidemiol Prevenzione 28: 50–53Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Habbema JDF, van Putten DJ, van Oortmarssen GJ, van der Maas PJ (1981) Preliminaries for evaluation of breast cancer screening. Third progress report of research project. Decision making on mass screening. Dept of Public Health and Social Medicine, Erasmus University, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Habbema JDF, van Oortmarssen GJ (1982) Performance characteristics of screening tests. Clin Lab Med 2: 639–656Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    La Vecchia C, Franceschi S, de Carli A, Fasoli M, Gentile A, Tognoni G (1984) “Pap” smear and the risk of cervical neoplasia: quantitative estimates from a case-control study. Lancet II: 779–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Cecchini

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations