Advertisement

S Phase Fractions and DNA Ploidy as Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer

  • G. E. Feichter
  • D. von Fournier
  • M. Kaufmann
Conference paper

Abstract

Clinical experience has shown that mammary carcinomas can be classified according to their type of progression into slow-growing and fast-growing ones, where the terms “slow” and “fast” tend to reflect the subjective impression of the observing clinician. The biological explanation of the differences in tumor growth patterns, among other aspects of tumor aggression, is given by tumor cell cycle kinetic studies.

Keywords

Breast Cancer Mammary Carcinoma Phase Fraction Tumor Growth Pattern Thymidine Label Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Auer G, Caspersson TO, Wallgren AS (1980) DNA content and survival in breast cancer. Anal Quant Cytol 2: 161–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beck HP (1980) Evaluation of flow cytometric data of human tumours. Correction procedures for background and cell aggregations. Cell Tissue Kinet 13: 173–181PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Feichter GE, Mueller A, Kaufmann M, Haag D, Born I, Kubli F, Goerttler K (1985) DNA-ploidy, DNA synthesis, histological grading, stage and steroid receptor content of breast cancer. Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol 69: 143–144Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feichter GE, Maier H, Adler D, Born IA, Abel U, Haag D, Goerttler K (1987) S-phase fractions and DNA-ploidy of oropharyngeal squamous epithelium carcinomas compared with histologic grade, stage, response to chemotherapy and survival. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh), 104: 377–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gentili S, Sanfillipo O, Silvestrini R (1981) Cell proliferation and its relationship to clinical features and relapse in breast cancer. Cancer 48: 974–979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haag D (1980) Flow microfluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) analysis supplementing routine histopathologic diagnosis of biopsy specimens. Lab Invest 42: 85–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haag D, Goerttler K, Tschahargane C (1984) The proliferative index (PI) of human breast cancer as obtained by flow cytometry. Pathol Res Pract 178: 315–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haag D, Feichter GE, Goerttler K (1986) Systematical errors in evaluation of S-phase fractions from DNA-distributions of solid tumors. International Symposium on Clinical Cytometry and Histometry, Apr 20–26. Schloß ElmauGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hedley DW, Friedlander ML, Taylor IW, Rugg CA, Musgrove EA (1983) Method for analysis of cellular DNA content of paraffin-embedded pathological material using flow cytometry. J Histochem Cytochem 31: 1333–1335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McDivitt R W, Stone KR, Craig RB, Palmer JO, Meyer JS, Bauer WC (1986) A proposed classification of breast cancer based on kinetic information. Cancer 57: 269–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McGuire WL, Meyer JS, Barlogie B, Kute TE (1985) Impact of flow cytometry on predicting recurrence and survival in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 5: 117–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meyer JS, Friedman E, McCrate MM, Bauer WC (1983) Prediction of early course of breast carcinoma by thymidine labeling. Cancer 51: 1879–1886PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Silvestrini R, Daidone MG, di Fronzo G (1979) Relationship between proliferative activity and estrogen receptors in breast cancer. Cancer 44: 665–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tubiana M, Pejcevic J, Renaud A, Contesso G, Chavaudra N, Gioanni J, Malaise EP (1981) Kinetic parameters and the course of the disease in breast cancer. Cancer 47: 937–947PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    von Fournier D, Weber E, Hoeffken W, Bauer M, Kubli F, Barth V (1980) Growth rate of 147 mammary carcinomas. Cancer 45: 2198–2207CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. E. Feichter
  • D. von Fournier
  • M. Kaufmann

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations