Advertisement

A Comparison of Presentation and Representation: Linguistic and Pictorial

  • René Jorna

Abstract

In his book Brainstorms (1978) Daniel Dennett makes some very important remarks about man and computers. The main theme of the book is that computers lack intentions, whereas we, humans, can understand each other because we have and use intentions. In the chapter “Conditions of Personhood” Dennett puts the following question:

Do we communicate with computers in Fortran? Fortran seems to be a language; it has a grammar, a vocabulaire, a semantics. The transactions in Fortran between man and machine are often viewed as cases of man communicating with machine, but such transactions are pale copies of human verbal communication precisely because the Gricean conditions for nonnatural meaning have been bypassed. There is no room for them to apply. Achieving’s one’s end in transmitting a bit of Fortran to the machine does not hinge on getting the machine to recognize one’s intentions. This does not mean that all communications with computers in the future will have this short-coming (or strength, depending on your purposes), but just that we do not now communicate, in the strong (Gricean) sense, with computers, (p. 280)

The strong (Gricean) sense of communication is totally based on first and higher order intentions.

Keywords

Mental Representation Pictorial Representation Symbol System Musical Score Propositional Representation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson J.R. (1983). The Architecture of cognition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson J. R.& Bower G. H. (1973). Human associative memory. Winston, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  3. Dennett D.C.(1978). Brainstorms. Harvester Press, Hassocks, Sussex.Google Scholar
  4. Dreyfus H.L. (Ed.). (1982). Husserl, intentionality and cognitive science. M.I.T. Press. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  5. Elgin C.Z.(1983). With reference to reference. Hackett, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
  6. Fodor J.A. (1975). The language of thought. Harvester Press. Hassocks, Sussex.Google Scholar
  7. Goodman N. (1968). Languages of art. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
  8. Goodman N. (1972). Problems and Projects. Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
  9. Goodman N. (1984). Of mind and other matters. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  10. Grice H.P. (1957). Meaning. Philosophical Review, LXVI, pp. 377–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johnson-Laird P.N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. Kolers P.A. & Smythe W.E. (1979). Images, symbols and skills. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 33 (3), pp. 158–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kosslyn S.M. (1981). Image and mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  14. Newell A. (1980). Physical symbol systems. Cognitive Science, 4, 2, pp. 135–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Palmer S.F. (1978). Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation. In: Cognition and categorization. E.H. Rosch & B.B. Lloyd (Eds.). Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  16. Pylyshyn Z.W. (1984). Computation and cognition. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  17. Rumelhart D.E. & Norman D.A. (1983). Representation in memory. Cognitive Science Laboratory, La Jolla, CA.Google Scholar
  18. Searle J.R. (1984). Intentionality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  19. Shepard R.N. & Metzler J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, pp. 701–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Simon H.A. (1978). On the forms of mental representation. In: Perception and cognition. (Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science Vol. IX.) C. Wade Savage (Ed.), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  21. Treffers A. (1984). Mathematisch-didactische Stromingen en Onderzoek van Wiskunde-onderwijs. In: Rekenen. P.G. Vos, K.B. Koster & J. Kingma, (Eds.). Swets and Zeitlinger, Lisse.Google Scholar
  22. Tuiving E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford. University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  23. Vonk W. (1977). Retrieval from semantic memory. Academisch Proefschrift, Groningen.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • René Jorna

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations