Skip to main content

Applied Welfare Economics and Frisch’s Conjecture

  • Conference paper
  • 85 Accesses

Abstract

My objective in this paper is to consider a number of ambiguities which have arisen in modern applied welfare economics. At a technical level, I am not proposing to say anything new. Rather I will be concerned with the interpretation and critical assessment of some recent literature and the direction in which I believe this area of research should proceed in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aaron, H., (1970): “Public Goods and Income Distribution.” Econometrica 38: 907– 920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aaron, H., and McGuire, M. (1969): “Efficiency and Equity in the Optimal Supply of a Public Good.” Review of Economics and Statistics 51: 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlheim, M., and Rose, M. (1984): “Alte und neue Maße individueller Steuerlasten.” Finanzarchiv 42: 274–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, R. G. D. (1949): “The Economic Theory of Index Numbers.” Economica 16: 197–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B. (1970): “On the Measurement of Inequality.” Journal of Economic Theory 2: 224–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R. (1974): “The Welfare Foundations of Cost-Benefit Analysis.” Economic Journal 84: 926–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byron, R. P. (1970): “A Simple Method for Estimating Demand Systems Under Separable Utility Assumptions.” Review of Economic Studies 37: 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements, K. W.; Finke, R.; and Theil, H. (1984): “Frisch’s Conjecture and the Own-Price Elasticity of the Demand for Food.” Economics Letters 15: 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. (1951): “The Coefficient of Resource Utilization.” Econometrica 19: 273– 292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G. (1954): “A Classical Tax-Subsidy Problem.” Econometrica 22: 14–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgeworth, F. Y. (1897): “The Pure Theory of Taxation.” Economic Journal 7: 550–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R.; Lu, W.; and Theil, H. (1984): “A Cross-Country Tabulation of Own-Price Elasticities of Demand.” Economics Letters 14: 137–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, R. (1932): New Methods of Measuring Marginal Utility. Tübingen: G. Möhr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, R. (1959): “A Complete Scheme for Computing all Direct and Cross Demand Elasticities in a Model with Many sectors.” Econometrica 27: 177–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harberger, A. (1971): “Three Basic Postulates for Applied Welfare Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 9: 785–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harberger, A. (1974): Taxation and Welfare. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R. (1981): Value and Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houthakker, H. S., and Taylor, L. D. (1970): Consumer Demand in the United States, 1929–1970. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D. W.; Lau, L. J.; and Stoker, T. M. (1980): “Welfare Comparison Under Exact Aggregation.” American Economic Review 70: 268–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D. W.; Lau, L. J.; and Stoker, T. M. (1981): “Aggregate Consumer Behaviour and Individual Welfare.” In Macroecomomic Analysis, edited by D. Currie, R. Nobay, and D. Pell. London: Croom-Helm, pp. 35–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. A. (1984): “Tax Policy and Family Welfare.” (Second Annual Sir Eric Roll Lecture.) Discussion Papers in Economics and Econometrics No. 8314, Southampton: University of Southampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lluch, C.; Powell, A. A.; and Williams, R. A. (1977): Patterns in Household Demand and Saving. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, G. W. (1983): New Methods for Measuring Economic Welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, G. W., and Pearce, I. F. (1976): “Exact Measures of Welfare and the Cost of Living.” Review of Economic Studies 43: 465–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, G. W., and Ulph, D. (1986): “Exact Welfare Measures.” Economic Perspectives 4: 7–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maital, S. (1973): “Public Goods and Income Distribution: Some Further Results.” Econometrica 41: 561–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morey, E. R. (1984): “Confuser Surplus.” American Economic Review 74: 163–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuburger, H., and Foster, C. (1974): “The Ambiguity of the Consumer’s Surplus Measure of Welfare Change.” Oxford Economic Papers 26: 66–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, I. F. (1964): A Contribution to Demand Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phlips, L. (1974): Applied Consumption Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recktenwald, H., and Griiske, K.-D. (1980): “Justiva Distributiva durch Umverteilung? Eine Analyse der personalen Budgetinzidenz.” Kyklos 33: 16–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1947): Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1974): “Complementarity — An Essay on the 40th Anniversary of the Hicks-Allen Revolution in Demand Theory.” Journal of Economic Literature 12: 1255–1289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A., and Swamy, S. (1974): “Invariant Economic Index Numbers and Canonical Duality: Survey and Synthesis.” American Economic Review 64: 566–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1980): The System-Wide Approach to Microeconomics. Oxford: Basil Black- well.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag, B. (1971): “The Welfare Function of Income in Belgium: An Empirical Investigation.” European Economic Review 2: 337–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. (1978): Microeconomic Analysis. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vartia, Y. O. (1983): “Efficient Methods of Measuring Welfare Change and Compen-sated Income in Terms of Demand Functions.” Econometrica 51: 79–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

McKenzie, G. (1988). Applied Welfare Economics and Frisch’s Conjecture. In: Bös, D., Rose, M., Seidl, C. (eds) Welfare and Efficiency in Public Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73370-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73370-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-73372-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-73370-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics