Advertisement

Application in Analytical Procedures

  • Winfried Hartmeier

Abstract

As well as being a valuable analytical method, affinity chromatography can also be used to extract pure components from complex mixtures of substances. The method exploits the property of certain reactants to recognize each other and to form complexes. Affinity of this kind exists between antigens and antibodies, hormones and receptor proteins, to mention only two examples. As Table 20 shows, enzymes, too, have a specific affinity for a variety of substances.

Keywords

Affinity Chromatography Immobilize Enzyme Gluconic Acid Specific Affinity Reference Column 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  1. Al-Hitti I K, Moody G J, Thomas J D R (1984) Glucose oxidase membrane systems based on poly(vinylchloride) matrices for glucose determination with an iodide ion-selective electrode. Analyst 109: 1205–1208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blum L J, Coulet P R, Gautheron D C (1985) Collagen strip with immobilized luciferase for ATP bioluminescent determination. Biotechnol Bioeng 27: 232–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowers L D (1986) Applications of immobilized biocatalysts in chemical analysis. Anal Chem 58: 513A-530ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradley C R, Rechnitz G A (1986) Comparison of oxalate oxidase electrodes for urinary oxalate determinations. Anal Lett 19: 151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowers L D, Carr P W (1980) Immobilized enzymes in analytical chemistry. In: Fiechter A (ed) Advances in biochemical engineering, vol 5. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 89–129Google Scholar
  6. Clark M F, Adams A N (1977) Characteristics of the microplate method of enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of plant viruses. J gen Virol 34: 475–483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke D J, Blake-Coleman B C, Calder M R, Carr R J G, Moody S C (1984) Sensors for bioreactor monitoring and control - a perspective. J Biotechnol Is 135–158Google Scholar
  8. Oanielsson B (1983) Use of enzyme thermistor as a flow analyzer in biotechnology. In: Lafferty R M (ed) Enzyme technology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guilbault G G (1981) Applications of enzyme electrodes in analysis. Ann New York Acad Sci 369: 285–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Janson J-C (1984) Large-scale affinity purification - state of art and future prospects. Trends Biotechnol 2: 31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Karube I, Matsunaga T, Suzuki S, Asano T, Itoh S (1984) Immobilized antibody- based flow type enzyme immunosensor for determination of human serum albumin. J Biotechnol 1: 279–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kashiwabara K, Hobo T, Kobayashi E, Suzuki S (1985) Flow injection analysis for traces of zinc with immobilized carbonic anhydrase. Anal Chim Acta 178: 209–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kingdon C F M (1985) Biosensor design: microbial loading capacity of acetylcellu- lose membranes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 21: 176–179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kricka L J, Thorpe H G (1986) Immobilized enzymes in analysis. Trends Biotechnol 4: 253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu M-T, Ram B P, Hart L P, Pestka J J (1985) Indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the mycotoxin zearalenone. Appl Environ Microbiol 50: 45–49Google Scholar
  16. Makovos E B, Liu C C (1985) Measurements of lactate concentration using lactate oxidase and an electrochemical oxygen sensor. Biotechnol Bioeng 27: 167–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Margineanu D G, Vais H, Ardeleau I (1985) Bioselective electrodes with immobilized bacteria. J Biotechnol 3: 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hattiasson B, Mandenius C F, Danielsson B, Harlander P (1983) Computer control of fermentations with biosensors. Ann New York Acad Sei 413: 193–196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pacakova V, Stulik K, Brabcova D (1984) Use of the Clark oxygen sensor with immobilized enzymes for determinations in flow systems. Anal Chim Acta 159: 71–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Raghavan K G, Devasagayam T P A, Ramakrishnan V (1986) Immobilized enzyme brushes for clinical analyses: urea determination. Anal Lett 19: 163–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Renneberg R, Schubert F, Scheller F (1986) Coupled enzyme reactions for novel biosensors. Trends Biochem Sei lis 216–220Google Scholar
  22. Scheller F U, Schubert F, Renneberg R, Müller H G, Jaenchen M, Weise H (1985) Biosensors: trends and commercialization. Biosensors 1: 135–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schügerl K (1985) Sensor-Meßtechniken in der biotechnologischen Forschung und Industrie. Naturwissenschaften 72: 400–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Thompson R Q, Crough S R (1984) Stopped-flow kinetic determination of glucose and lactate with immobilized enzymes. Anal Chim Acta 159: 337–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wieck H J, Heider G H, Yacynych A M (1984) Chemically modified reticulated vitreous carbon electrode with immobilized enzyme as a detector in flow-injection determination of glucose. Anal Chim Acta 158: 137–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Winfried Hartmeier
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Technical BiochemistryUniversity of HohenheimStuttgart 70Germany

Personalised recommendations