Advertisement

Influence of Crisis Intervention Telephone Services (“Crisis Hotlines”) on the Suicide Rate in 25 German Cities

  • T. Riehl
  • E. Marchner
  • H.-J. Möller

Abstract

In the 1950s, churches of both confessions founded crisis intervention services called Telefonseelsorge in many major cities of the Federal Republic of Germany (in the following presentation, we will often refer to these services by using the shorter designation “crisis hotlines”). By 1979 — the year in which this study began — 68 telephone services were operating in which committed lay persons working without remuneration offered advice per telephone, 24 h a day, to individuals experiencing a psychological crisis.

Keywords

Suicide Rate Suicide Prevention Crisis Intervention Telephone Service Suicide Prevention Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bagley C (1968) The evaluation of a suicide prevention schema by an ecological method. Soc Sci Med 2:1–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barraclough BM, Jennings C (1977) Suicide prevention by the Samaritans. A controlled study of effectiveness. Lancet ii: 237–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barraclough BM, Jennings C (1979) Is suicide preventable by telephone counselling? A controlled study of the effectiveness of the Samaritans. 10th Int congr for suicide prevention and crisis intervention, Ottawa, pp 209–214Google Scholar
  4. Bridge TP, Potkin SG, Zung WW, Soldo BJ (1977) Suicide prevention centers — ecological study of effectiveness. J Nerv Ment Dis 164:18–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cullberg J (1978) The Nacka project — an experiment in community psychiatry. 9th Int congr for suicide prevention, Helsinki, pp 76–80Google Scholar
  6. Fox R (1976) The recent decline of suicide in Britain: the role of the Samaritan suicide prevention movement. In: Shneidman E (ed) Suicidology. Grune and Stratton, New York, pp 499–524Google Scholar
  7. Greer FL, Weinstein RS (1979) Suicide prevention center outreach: callers and noncallers compared. Psychol Rep 44:387–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jennings C (1977) Letter to the editor. Lancet ii: 706–707Google Scholar
  9. Jennings C, Barraclough BM, Moss JR (1978) Have the Samaritans lowered the suicide rate? A controlled study. Psychol Med 8:413–422PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kreitman N (1976) The coal gas story. Br J Prev Soc Med 30:86–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kreitman N (ed) (1977) Parasuicide. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Lancet editorial (1978) Suicide and the Samaritans. Lancet ii: 772–773Google Scholar
  13. Lawton A (1977) Suicide prevention by the Samaritans. Lancet ii:706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lester D (1973) Prevention of suicide. JAMA 225:203Google Scholar
  15. Lester D (1974 a) Effect of suicide prevention centers on suicide rates in the United States. Public Health Rep 89:37–39Google Scholar
  16. Lester D (1974 b) Suicide prevention centers: data from 1970. JAMA 229:394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lester D (1979) Preventing suicide: whether to, when and how. 10th Int congr for suicide prevention and crisis intervention, Ottawa, pp 246–252Google Scholar
  18. Stengel E, Cook NG (1961) Contrasting suicide rates in industrial communities. J Ment Sci 107:1011–1019PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Weiner IW (1969) The effectiveness of a suicide prevention program. Ment Hyg 53:357–363PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Riehl
  • E. Marchner
  • H.-J. Möller

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations