Advertisement

Submonolayers of Lead on Silicon (111) Surfaces: An X-Ray Standing Wave Analysis

  • B. N. Dev
  • G. Materlik
  • F. Grey
  • R. L. Johnson
Part of the Springer Series in Surface Sciences book series (SSSUR, volume 11)

Abstract

Systematic studies of adsorbed atoms on silicon surfaces have greatly contributed to our present understanding of the structures and the mechanisms of interface formation. In the case of the group III metals Al, Ga and In deposition of 1/3 monolayer (ML) on the Si(111) 7×7 surface produces √3×√3 R30° (denoted by √3×√3 from now on) reconstruction. Although several models were proposed to explain this reconstruction recent theoretical studies indicate /l/ that the eclipsed (T­4) model in which the metal atom is placed in the threefold-symmetric site above a second-layer Si atom has the lowest total energy if substrate relaxation is included and provides the best agreement with photoemission experiments. When group IV atoms are deposited on the Si(lll) 7×7 surface several different reconstructions (e.g., 5×5, 7×7, c(2×8), l×l, √3x√3) are found. For the 5×5 and 7×7 reconstructions the dimer-adatom stacking-fault model proposed by Takayanagi et al. is generally accepted whereas the c(2×8) structure is best explained by the adatom model. By analogy with the group III metals it might be expected that the √3×√3 structures produced by 1/3 ML Sn or Pb on Si(lll) could be explained by the threefold eclipsed model. In the present study we have applied the x-ray standing wave (XSW) technique to the Si(lll) √3×√3 -Pb system in order to determine the position of the Pb atoms relative to the bulk Si lattice.

Keywords

Covalent Radius Distance Component Lower Total Energy LEED Pattern Photoemission Experiment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J.E. Northrup: Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 683 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P.L. Cowan, J.A. Golovchenko, M.F. Robins: Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1680 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.A. Golovchenko, J.R. Patel, D.R. Kaplan, P.L. Cowan, M.J. Bedzyk: Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 560 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Materlik, A. Frahm, M.J. Bedzyk: Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 441 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    G. Materlik: Z. Phys. 861, 405 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.L. Johnson, J. Reichardt: Nucl. Instr. Meth. 208, 791 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    B.N. Dev, G. Materlik, R.L. Johnson, W. Kranz, P. Funke: Surf. Sci. 178, 1 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P.J. Estrup and J. Morrison: Surf. Sci. 2, 465 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. Saitoh, K. Oura, K. Asano, F. Shoji, T. Hanawa: Surf. Sci. 154, 394 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B.N. Dev, V. Aristov, N. Hertel, T. Thundat, W.M. Gibson: Surf. Sci. 163, 457 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    B.N. Dev, G. Materlik, F. Grey, R.L. Johnson, M. Clausnitzer: Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 3058 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.J. Lander, J. Morrison: Surf. Sci. 2, 553 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Kawazu, K. Akimoto, T. Oyama, G. Tominaga: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Solid Surface, Cannes, 1980, Vol. II, p. 1015Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    B.N. Dev, S.M. Mohapatra, KX. Mishra, W.M. Gibson, T.P. Das: Phys. Rev. B36 (August 15, 1987)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. Pauling: The Nature of the Chemical Bond and the Structure of Molecules and Crystals (Cornell University Press, 1960)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    B.N. Dev, G. Materlik, F. Grey, R.L. Johnson: unpublishedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. N. Dev
    • 1
  • G. Materlik
    • 1
  • F. Grey
    • 2
  • R. L. Johnson
    • 2
  1. 1.Hamburger Synchrotronstrahlungslabor (HASYLAB)Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron DESYHamburg 52Fed. Rep. of Germany
  2. 2.Max-Planck-Institut für FestkörperforschungStuttgart 80Fed. Rep. of Germany

Personalised recommendations