Abstract
The aim of paternity expertises is to estimate the relative likelihood of mutually exclusive genealogical hypotheses, based on the results of a genetic analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baur MP, Elston RC, Gürtler H, Henningsen K, Hummel K, Matsumoto H, Mayr W, Moris JW, Niejenhuis L, Polesky H, Salmon D, Valentin J, Walkers R (1986) No fallacies in the formulation of the paternity index. Am J Hum Genet 39: 528–536.
Chakraborty R, Ryman N (1981) Use of odds of paternity computations in determining the reliability of single exclusion in paternity testing. Hum Hered 31: 363–369.
Gürtler H (1977) Evaluation of the reliability of exclusions of paternity in Denmark. Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of the Society for Forensic Haemogenetics: 577–581.
Li CC, Chakravarti A (1985) Basic fallacies in the formulation of the paternity index. Am J Hum Genet 37: 809–818.
Valentin J (1977) The reliability of multiple exclusions of paternity. Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of the Society for Forensic Haemogenetics: 591–593.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Amorim, A., Rocha, J. (1988). The BIAS of the Dichotomy Exclusion / Non-Exclusion and the Evidential Value of L (or W). In: Mayr, W.R. (eds) Advances in Forensic Haemogenetics. Advances in Forensic Haemogenetics, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73330-7_123
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73330-7_123
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-18765-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-73330-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive