Advertisement

Status and Future Needs in Protozoan Ecology

  • Lawrence R. Pomeroy
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 25)

Abstract

Those of us who have been developing the concept of a marine microbial food web have believed for many years that Protozoa are major movers of energy and nutrients. Indeed, Vernadskii (1926) repeatedly referred to the special significance of microorganisms, including specific references to Protozoa as movers of materials on a global, biogeochemical scale. However, until recently this remained more a matter of opinion than established fact. The conferees brought together an impressive body of facts regarding both the magnitude and the diversity of protozoan activity. That protozoa are a dominant force in the ocean’s metabolism is no longer in doubt. A comprehensive understanding of protozoan metabolism in the ocean is a prerequisite to a full understanding of and to quantitatively model cycles of carbon and other biologically essential elements on a global scale. During this conference we defined the limits of our knowledge of protozoan ecology and highlighted a number of pressing needs, both for basic understanding of the biosphere and its function and for answering questions of immediate practical importance.

Keywords

Mixed Layer Trophic Transfer Heterotrophic Dinoflagellate Nepheloid Layer Organic Aggregate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen TBH, Starr TB (1982) Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity. Univ. Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  2. Azam F, Cho BC (1987) Bacterial utilisation of organic matter in the sea. Symposium 41, Soc Gen Microbiol p 261Google Scholar
  3. Azam F, Cowles T, Banse K, Osborne J, Harrison P J (1984) Free-living pelagic bacterioplankton: Sink or link in a marine foodweb? Eos 65: 926Google Scholar
  4. Bathmann UV, Noji TT, Voss M, Peinert R (1987) Copepod faecal pellets: abundance, sedimentation and content at a permanent station in the Norwegian Sea in May/June 1986. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 38: 45–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biddanda BA (1988) Microbial aggregation and degradation of phytoplankton-derived detritus in seawater. I. Microbial succession. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 42: 79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cho BC Azam F (1988.) Major role of bacteria in biogeochemical fluxes in the ocean’s interior. Nature 332:441–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ducklow HW, Purdie DA, Williams PJ leB, Davies JM (1986) Bacterioplankton: A sink for carbon in a coastal marine plankton community. Science 232: 865–867PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eppley RW, Horrigan SG, Fuhrman JA, Brooks ER, Price CC, Seilner K (1981) Origins of dissolved organic matter in southern California coastal waters: experiments on the role of Zooplankton. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 6: 149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fenchel T (1982) Ecology of heterotrophic microflagellates. IV. Quantitative occurrence and importance as consumers of bacteria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 9: 35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Findlay SEG, Meyer JL, Edwards RT (1984) Measuring bacterial production via rate of incorporation of 3H thymidine into DNA. J Microbiol Methods 2:57–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gause GF (1934) The Struggle for Existence. Williams and Wilkins BaltimoreCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holben WE, Tiedje JM (1988) Application of nucleic acid hybridisation in microbial ecology. Ecology 69: 561–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jackson GA (1987) Physical and chemical properties of aquatic environments. Symposium 41, Soc Gen Microbiol p 213Google Scholar
  14. Kitts DB (1977) The Structure of Geology. Southern Methodist Univ Press, DallasGoogle Scholar
  15. Lande R, Wood AM (1987) Suspension times of particles in the upper ocean. Deep-Sea Res 34: 61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lasker R (1978) The relation between oceanographic conditions and larval anchovy food in the California Current: Identification of factors contributing to recruitment failure. Rapp P-v Reun Cons int Explor Mer 173: 212–230Google Scholar
  17. Lasker R, Zweifel JR (1978) Growth and survival of first- feeding northern anchovy larvae (Engraulis mordax) in patches containing different proportions of large and small prey. In: JH Steele (ed) Spatial Patterns in Plankton Communities p 329Google Scholar
  18. Lehman JT (1986) Microscale nutrient patchiness in plankton communities. ASLO Abstracts of Ann Meeting p 46Google Scholar
  19. Lehman JT, Scavia D (1982a) Microscale patchiness of nutrients in plankton communities. Science 216: 729–730PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lehman JT, Scavia D (1982b) Microscale nutrient patches produced by Zooplankton. Proc Nat Acad Sci US 79: 5001–5005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lucas MI (1987) An experimental study of microflagellate bacterivory: Further evidence for the importance and complexity of microplanktonic interactions. In: Payne RIL Gulland JR Brink KH (eds) The Benguela and Comparable Ecosystems. S Afr J Sci 5: 791–808Google Scholar
  22. Moore WS, Dymond J (1988) Correlation of 210Pb removal with organic carbon fluxes in the Pacific Ocean. Nature 331: 339–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Newell RC, Linley EAS (1984) Significance of microheterotrophs in the decomposition of phytoplankton: Estimates of carbon and nitrogen flow based on the biomass of plankton communities. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 16: 105–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Newell RC, Lucas MI, Linley AES (1981) Rate of degradation and efficiency of conversion of phytoplankton debris by marine microorganisms. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 6: 123–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. O’Neill RV, DeAngelis DL, Waide JB, Allen TFH (1986) A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems. Princeton Univ Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  26. Pomeroy LR (1974) The ocean’s food web, a changing paradigm. BioScience 24: 499–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pomeroy LR, Wiebe WJ (1988) Energetics of microbial food webs. Hydrobiologia 159: 7–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pomeroy LR, Hargrove EC, Alberts JJ, (1988) The ecosystem perspective. In: Pomeroy LR, Alberts JJ (eds) Concepts of Ecosystem Ecology. Springer-Verlag New York p 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Porter KG (1988) Cell sorting techniques for microbial ecology. Ecology 69: 558–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Price HJ, Paffenhofer G-A, Strickler JR (1983) Modes of cell capture in calanoid copepods. Limnol Oceanogr 28: 116–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Riemann B (1985) Potential importance of fish prédation and Zooplankton grazing on natural populations of freshwater bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 50: 187–193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Roberts RD, Wicks RJ, Sephton LM (1986) Spatial and temporal variations in bacterial macromolecule labelling with [methyl- H] thymidine in a hypertrophic lake. Appl Environ Microbiol 52: 1368–1373Google Scholar
  33. Sherr EB, Sherr BF, Fallon RD, Newell SY (1986) Small aloricate ciliates as a major component of the marine meterotrophic nanoplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 31: 177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Silver MW Aldredge AL (1981) Bathypelagic marine snow: deep-sea algal and detrital community. J Mar Res 39: 501–530Google Scholar
  35. Smetacek V (1984) The supply of food to the benthos. In: Fasham, M J R (ed) Flows of energy and materials in marine ecosystems: Theory and Practice. Plenum, New York, p 517Google Scholar
  36. Stockner JG, Porter KG (1988) Microbial food webs in freshwater planktonic ecosystems. In: Carpenter SR (ed) Complex Interactions in Lake Communities, Springer-Verlag, New York, p 80Google Scholar
  37. Strickler JR (1982) Calanoid copopods, feeding currents, and the role of gravity. Science 218: 158–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vernadskii V I (1926) Biosfera. LeningradGoogle Scholar
  39. Wicks RJ, Robarts RD (1988) The extraction and purification of DNA labelled with {methyl-3H}thymidine in aquatic bacterial production studies. J Plankton Res (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence R. Pomeroy
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Zoology and Institute of EcologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations