Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology of Liver Tumors

  • E. Boijsen
Conference paper

Abstract

The present-day approach in radiology to reveal liver tumors is with noninvasive techniques. Numerous investigations have shown that ultrasonography (US) and computed tomography (CT) with and without intravenous contrast enhancement give a high accuracy. Radionuclide scanning, previously the most common technique, has therefore become practically obsolete despite the fact that the relatively new single-photon emission tomography has improved the sensitivity and specificity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is improving in resolution and speed and may very well soon replace conventional CT as a complement to US [6, 7]. The invasive technique of angiography has also been replaced as a diagnostic tool for detecting tumors with one exception, i.e., highly vascularized lesions such as hepatomas and metastases of endocrine origin. In these latter cases, the noninvasive methods cannot compete with angiography in detecting small nodules.

Keywords

Iodine Radionuclide Intralipid 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ivancev K, Lunderquist A (1987) Personal communicationGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kobayashi H, Hidaka H, Kajiya Y et al. (1986) Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma by transarterial injection of anticancer agents in iodized oil suspension or of radioactive iodized oil solution. Acta Radiol (Diagn) 27:139–147Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Konno T, Maeda H, Iwai K et al. (1983) Effects of arterial administration of high molecular-weight anticancer agent SMANCS with lipid lymphographic agent on hepatoma. Europ J Cancer Clin Oncol 19:1053–1065PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lin G (1984) Microvascular patterns and blood supply of hepatic tumours. Thesis, LundGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lundstedt C (1987) Radiological diagnosis of liver tumours. Evaluation of angiography and intravenous and intra-arterially enhanced computed tomography. Thesis, LundGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reinig JW, Dwyer AJ, Miller DL et al. (1987) Liver metastasis detection: comparative sensitivities of MR-imaging and CT scanning. Radiology 162:43–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stark DD, Wittenberg J, Edelman RR et al. (1986) Detection of hepatic metastases: analysis of pulse sequence performance in MR imaging. Radiology 159:365–370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sugarbaker PH, Vermess M, Doppman JL et al. (1984) Improved detection of focal lesions with computerized tomographic examination of the liver using ethiodized oil emulsion (EOE-13) liver contrast. Cancer 54:1489–1495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Boijsen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations