Quantitative Morphology of Hepatocyte Nuclei in the Comparative Studies of Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate Effects

  • D. Komitowski
  • S. Muto
  • P. Schmezer
  • B. Pool
Conference paper
Part of the Archives of Toxicology book series (TOXICOLOGY, volume 12)

Abstract

Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) is a widespread environmental contaminant with potential toxic and carcionogenic effects. Although the biological action of DEHP has been a subject of intense study, the question of whether or not it poses a substantial human hazard still remains unanswered (Reddy and Lalwai 1983). In this regard species- and dose-related differences in responses to DEHP action appear important (Albro et al. 1982). So far the carcinogenicity of DEHP has only been demonstrated in rats and mice by giving very high doses (NTP 1982). The low order of acute toxicity and the lack of consistent pathological findings at low doses delineate other aspects of DEHP action. Still little is known about subtle DEHP effects that may be induced by the level of the expected environmental exposure (NTP 1981). In an attempt to describe subtle changes and recognize species-related differences, we applied image analysis to hepatocyte nuclei of rats and hamsters treated by single doses of DEHP.

Keywords

Toxicity Dioxide Macromolecule Phthalate Toxicology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albro PW, Corbett JT, Schroeder IL, Jordan S, Matthews HB (1982) Pharmacokinetics, interactions with macromolecules and species differences in metabolism of DEHP. Environ Health Perspect 45:19–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Komitowski D, Zinser G (1985) Quantitative description of chromatin structure during neoplasia by the method of image processing. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 7:178–182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Komitowski D, Schmezer P, Schmitt B, Muto S (1986) Image analysis of hepatocyte nuclei in assessing di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate effects eluding detection by conventional microscopy. Toxicology 41:11–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lake GB, Gray IB, Foster JR, Stubberfield R, Gangolli SD (1984) Comparative studies on di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate-induced hepatic peroxisome proliferation in the rat and hamster. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 72:46–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. National Toxicology Program (1981) Interagency Regulatory Liason Group, Proc Conf on “Phthalates”. US Department of Health and Human Sciences, Washington DC, June 9–11Google Scholar
  6. National Toxicology Program (1982) Technical report on the carcinogenesis bioassay of di(2-ethylhexal)phthalate. CAS no 117–81–7Google Scholar
  7. Reddy JK, Lalwai ND (1983) Carcinogenesis by hepatic peroxisome proliferators: evaluation of the risk of hypolipidemic drugs and industrial plasticizers to humans. CRC Crit Rev Toxicol 12:1–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Komitowski
    • 1
  • S. Muto
    • 1
  • P. Schmezer
    • 1
  • B. Pool
    • 1
  1. 1.German Cancer Research CenterHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations