Advertisement

Sib Competition as an Element of Genotype-Environment Interaction for Body Size in the Great Tit

  • A. J. van Noordwijk

Abstract

Final body size results when growth stops. In order to gain insight in the genotype-environment interactions affecting adult body size one must therefore study the growth process.

Keywords

Brood Size Final Size Compensatory Growth Tarsus Length Good Environmental Condition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balen JH van (1967) The significance of variations in body weight and wing length in the great tit Parus major. Ardea 55:l-59Google Scholar
  2. Balen JH van (1973) A comparative study of the breeding ecology of the great tit Parus major in different habitats. Ardea 61:1–93Google Scholar
  3. Balen JH van (1980) Population fluctuations in the great tit and feeding conditions in winter. Ardea 68:144–164Google Scholar
  4. Bengtsson H, Ryden O (1983) Parental feeding rate in relation to begging behavior in asynchronously hatched broods of the great tit Parus major. An experimental study. Behav Ecol Socio-biol 12:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bishop JA, Cook LM (1981) Genetic consequences of man-made change. Academic Press, London New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Drent RH, Daan S (1980) The prudent parent: energetic adjustments in avian breeding. Ardea 68: 225–252Google Scholar
  7. Garnett MC (1981) Body size, its heritability and influence on juvenile survival among great tits Parus major. Ibis 123:31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gibb J (1950) The breeding biology of the great and blue tit mice. Ibis 92:507–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Löhrl H (1968) Das Nesthäkchen als biologisches Problem. J Ornithol 109:383–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mertens JAL (1969) The influence of brood size on the energy metabolism and water loss of nestling great tits Parus major major. Ibis 111:11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Noordwijk A J van (1984) Quantitative genetics in natural populations of birds illustrated with examples from the great tit, Parus major. In: Wöhrman K, Loeschcke V (eds) Population biology and evolution. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Noordwijk AJ van (1986) Two stage selection, where the first stage only reduces the environmental variance in body size in the great tit. Proc XIX Congr Int Ornithol, Ottawa 1986 (in press)Google Scholar
  13. Noordwijk AJ van, Gebhardt M (1987) Reflections on the genetics of quantitative traits with continuous environmental variation. In: Loeschcke V (ed) Genetic constraints on adaptive evolution. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 73–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Noordwijk AJ van, Balen JH van, Scharloo W (1981) Genetic variation in egg dimensions in natural populations of the great tit. Genetica 55:221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Noordwijk AJ van, Balen JH van, Scharloo W (1987) Heritability of body size in a natural population of the great tit (Parus major) and its relation to age and environmental conditions during growth. Genet Res (in press)Google Scholar
  16. O’Connor R (1977) Differential growth and body composition in altricial passerines. Ibis 119: 147–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Richards FJ (1959) A flexible growth function for empirical use. J Exp Bot 10:290–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Royama T (1966) Factors governing feeding rate, food requirement and brood size of nestling great titsParus major. Ibis 108:313–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schifferli L (1973) The effect of egg weight on the subsequent growth of nestling great tits Parus major. Ibis 115:549–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Slagsvold T (1986) Asynchronous versus synchronous hatching in birds: experiments with the pied flycatcher. J An Ecol 55:1115–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stearns SC, Koella JC (1986) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in life-history traits: predictions of reaction norms for age and size at maturity. Evolution 40:893–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tinbergen JM (1986) Cost of reproduction in the great tit (Parus major): intraseasonal costs associated with brood size. Ardea 74:111–122Google Scholar
  23. White GC, Brisbin IL, Jr (1980) Estimation and comparison of parameters in stochastic growth models for barn owls. Growth 44:97–111PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. J. van Noordwijk
    • 1
  1. 1.Zoologisches InstitutBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations