Competition versus Monopoly in the Supply of Public Goods

  • Werner Güth
  • Martin Hellwig

Abstract

In an earlier paper (Güth and Hellwig (1986)), we studied the supply of a public good by a profit-maximizing monopolistic producer. A major finding of our analysis was that the private monopoly supply of a public good is inefficient because, as in the case of a private good, the monopolist makes his supply artificially scarce. In this paper we study the question whether the inefficiency would disappear if there was a sufficient amount of competition among actual or potential providers of the public good.

Keywords

Expense Nash Monopoly 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    van Damme, E., (1985), Fair Allocation of an Indivisible Commodity, mimeo, University of Technology, Delft.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Dasgupta, P.S., P.J. Hammond, and E.S. Maskin (1979), The Implementation of Social Choice Rules: Some General Results on Incentive Compatibility, Review of Economic Studies 46, 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    Demsetz, H., (1968), Why Regulate Utilities, Journal of Law and Economics 11, 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    Goldberg, V., (1976), Regulation and Administered Contracts, Bell Journal of Economics 7, 426–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. (5).
    Güth W. and M. Hellwig (1986), The Private Supply of a Public Good, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, Supplementum 5, 121–159.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Harsanyi, J.C., (1967–8), Games with Incomplete Information Played by ’Bayesian’ Players, Management Science 14, 159–189, 320–344, 486–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. (7).
    Kohlberg, E. and J.F. Mertens, (1986), On the Strategic Stability of Equilibria, Econometrica 54, 1003–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Kreps, D.M. and R. Wilson, (1982), Sequential Equilibria, Econometrica 50, 863–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. (9).
    Myerson, R.B., (1979), Incentive Compatibility and the Bargaining Problem, Econometrica 47, 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Okada, A., (1981), On Stability of Perfect Equilibrium Points, International Journal of Game Theory 10, 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. (11).
    Samuelson, P.A., (1954), The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure, Review of Economics and Statistics 36, 387–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. (12).
    Samuelson, P.A., (1955), Diagrammatic Exposition of a Theory of Public Expenditure, Review of Economics and Statistics 37, 350–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. (13).
    Selten, R., (1975), Reexamination of the Perfectness Concept for Equilibrium Points in Extensive Games, International Journal of Game Theory 4, 25–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. (14).
    von Weizsäcker, C.C., (1980), Barriers to Entry, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems No. 185, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Werner Güth
  • Martin Hellwig

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations