Skip to main content

Can a jejunal loop offer more resistance to acidity?

  • Conference paper
Benign Lesions of the Esophagus and Cancer
  • 15 Accesses

Abstract

When loss of anti-reflux function between the esophagus and the stomach occurs from destruction of the distal esophagus by ulceration, fibrosis or perforation, the ability to construct a competent valve surgically (Nissen, Hill or Belsey), is lost. In these cases, interposition reproduces a structure that prevents reflux acid burn of the distal esophagus. Human colon and jejunal segments are available. In my opinion, based on the literature and my own experience, the jejunal loop will offer a uniquely better resistance to esophageal acidity if properly interposed between the esophagus and the stomach. The basis for this rests on anatomic, radiographic and physiologic phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Merendino KA, Dillard DH (1955) The concept of sphincter substitution by an interposed jejunal segment for anatomic physiologic abnormalities at the esophagogastric junction. Ann Surg 142:486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Moylan JP, Bell JW, Cantrell JR, Merendino KA (1971) The jejunal interposition operation: A follow-up on seventeen patients followed 10 to 17 Years. Ann Surg 172:205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Polk HC (1980) Jejunal interposition for reflux esophagitis and esophageal stricture unresponsive to valvuloplasty. World J Surg 4:731–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Burrows L, Frankel A (oral permission)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jones EL, Skinner DB, DeMeester TR, Elkins RC, Zuidema GD (1973) Response of the interposed human colonic segment to an acid challenge. Ann Surg 177:75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilkins EW Jr (1980) Long-segment colon substitution for the esophagus. Ann Surg, Vol 192, #6, pp 722–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Belsey R (1965) Reconstruction of esophagus with left colon. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 49:33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Sirak HD, Clatworthy HW, Elliot DW (1954) An evaluation of jejunal and colic transplants in experimental esophagitis. Surgery 36:399–410

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dillard DH, Merendino KA (1956) New studies in the dog supporting the concept of equal resistance of various levels of the intestinal tract to acid peptic digestion. J Surg Gynec Obstet 103:289

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrer JM, Bruck HM (1969) Jejunal and colonic interposition for non-malignant disease of the oesophagus. Ann Surg 169:533–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pasch AR, Putnam T (1985) Jejunal interposition for recurrent gastro-oesophageal reflux in children. Am J Surg 150:246–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mignon M, De Mestier Ph, Zielinski B (1984) The problem of remaining gastric acidity. In Cancer of the Esophagus in 1984. OESO international Congress. Maloine Publ p 280–281

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sicular, A., Mignon, M., Ratineau, F. (1989). Can a jejunal loop offer more resistance to acidity?. In: Giuli, R., McCallum, R.W. (eds) Benign Lesions of the Esophagus and Cancer. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73055-9_134

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73055-9_134

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-73057-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-73055-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics