Advertisement

Central Law and Peripheral Law

  • P. Carrozza

Abstract

The aim of these observations is to provide an overall view of the features of legislative decentralization on a territorial basis (whatever the name given to the local entities — member states, régions, regioni, Länder, comunidades autònomas, etc.) as they have developed in the principal contemporary legal systems, from the particular viewpoint of their repercussions on the law-making process and, more generally, on the sources of law system.

Keywords

Legal System Judicial Review Cooperative Model Legislative Power Constitutional Provision 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    See, for example, R. Bowie, C. J. Friedrich (eds.), Studies in Federalism, Boston, 1954; M. J. C. Vile, Federalism in U.S. Canada and Australia, London, 1973; M. Bothe, Die Kompetenzstruktur des modernen Bundesstaates in rechtvergleichender Sicht, Berlin, 1977; E. Garcia de Enterría (ed.), La distribucciòn de las competencias econòmicas entre il poder central y las autonomías territoriales en el Derecho Comparado y en la Constituciòn espan`ola, Madrid, 1980Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    See K. C. Wheare, The Federal Government, London, 1946Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    On Italian regionalization, see L. Paladin, Diritto regionale,Padua, 1985, p. 7 and Le Regioni oggi, in Le Regioni, 1985, p. 7Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    See K. Hesse, Der unitarische Bundesstaat, Karlsruhe, 1962Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    See K. Stern, Das Staatsrecht der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Munich, 1977, I, p. 592ff. and G. Kisker, Neuordnung des bundesstaatlichen Kompetenzgefüges und Bund-Länder Planung, in Der Staat, 1975, 2, p. 169Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    See, from differing points of view, C. J. Friedrich, Constitutional Government and Democracy, Boston, 1950, and F. L. Neumann, Federalism and Freedom: a Critique, in A. W. Macmahon (ed.), Federalism: Mature and Emergent, New York, 1962, p. 44Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    The critique - referring to the Italian framers of ‘47 - was made by M. S. Giannini, Del lavare la testa all’asino, in A. Barbera, F. Bassanini (eds.), I nuovi poteri delle regioni e degli enti locali, Bologna, 1978, p. 7Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cf. L. Vandelli, I Comuni e le Province, in S. Bartole, F. Mastragostino and L. Vandelli, Le autonomie territoriali, Bologna, 1984, p. 218 and P. Legendre, Histoire de l’administration de 1750 à nos jours, Paris, 1968Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    See E. Schmidt-Jortzig, Die Einrichtungsgarantien der Verfassung, Göttingen, 1979 and L. Parejo, Garantìa institucional y autonomias locales, Madrid, 1981Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    See, for a general survey, Y. Meny (ed.), Dix ans de régionalisation en Europe. Bilan et perspectives, Paris, 1982 and B. De Witte, La pluralité ethnique et l’autonomie culturelle. Etude comparative, in Y. Meny (ed.), Centres et périphéries: le partage du pouvoir, Paris, 1982, p. 7 Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    For a broad overview and a complete bibliography, see M. Cappelletti, M. Seccombe and J. Weiler (eds.), Integration through Law. Europe and the American Federal Experience,Berlin-New York, 1986, Vol. I, Books 1, 2 and 3Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    See C. Mortati, Le forme di governo,Padua, 1973, p. 222ff. and B. Mirkine Guetzevitch, Les constitutions européennes, Paris, 1951, p. 15ff.Google Scholar
  13. 15.
    See, in particular, R. Dahl, Pluralist Democracy in the U.S. Conflict and Consent, Chicago, 1967, p. 326; contra D. Elazar, American Federalism: a View from the States, New York, 1984Google Scholar
  14. 16.
    See, from different points of view, J. L. Sundqvist, D. W. Davis, Making Federalism work, Washington (D.C.), 1969; D. B. Walker, Toward a functioning Federalism, Boston, 1981; M. D. Reagan, J. G. Sanzone, The New Federalism, New York, 1981Google Scholar
  15. 17.
    See Y. Meny, Crises,régions et modernisation de l’Etat, in Pouvoirs, 19 (1981), p. 5 and G. Bognetti, Le Regioni in Europa: alcune riflessioni sui loro problemi e sul loro destino, in Le Regioni, 1984, p. 1087Google Scholar
  16. 18.
    See M. S. Giannini, Autonomia (Teoria generale e diritto pubblico),in Enciclopedia del Diritto, (IV), Milan, 1959, p. 365Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    See G. Ambrosini, Un tipo intermedio di Stato fra l’unitario e il federale caratterizzato dall’autonomia regionale, in Rivista di Diritto Pubblico, 1933, p. 165: this theory presupposed the idea of a clear contrast between unitary state and federal state, typical of French scholars in the interwar period: see, for example, L. Duguit, Traité de droit constitutionnel, Paris, 1923 2, III, p. 57Google Scholar
  18. 20.
    See, for example, G. Burdeau, Traité de science politique (II, L’Etat), Paris, 1967, p. 386Google Scholar
  19. 21.
    On the concept offédéralisme rationalisé, see B. Mirkine Guetzevitch, Les nouvelles tendances du droit constitutionnel, Paris, 1936, p. 20ff.Google Scholar
  20. 22.
    For a general survey, see S. Varela, El problema regional en la Segunda Republica espanola, Madrid, 1976Google Scholar
  21. 23.
    See H. Kelsen, Allgemeine Staatslehre, Berlin, 1925, p. 165ff.; on the alternating fortunes of this conception, see T. Öhlinger, Der Bundesstaat zwischen reiner Rechtslehre und Verfassungsrealität,Vienna, 1976Google Scholar
  22. 24.
    See, for example, A. Macmahon, Federation, in Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences (V-VI), New York, 1951, p. 172ff., and K. C. Wheare, Modern Constitutions, London, 1951, p. 1ff.Google Scholar
  23. 25.
    See J. L. Kunz, Une nouvelle théorie de l’Etat federal, in Revue de droit international et de legislation comparée, 1931, 1, p. 140Google Scholar
  24. 26.
    L. H. Tribe, American Constitutional Law, Mineola, 1978, p. 2Google Scholar
  25. 27.
    See M. Imboden, Die staatsrechtliche Bedeutung des Grundsatzes “Bundesrecht bricht kantonales Recht”, in Revue de Droit Suisse, 1942, p. 203. The difference lies in the fact that the former are of a “concrete” nature while the latter are “abstract”, with all the ensuing consequences; see A. Pizzorusso, I sistemi di giustizia costituzionale: dai modelli alla prassi, in Quaderni Costituzionali, 1982, p. 521Google Scholar
  26. 28.
    The definition was made by B. Schwartz, A Basic History of the U.S. Supreme Court, Princeton, 1968, p. 27Google Scholar
  27. 29.
    See A. Auer, La juridiction constitutionnelle en Suisse, Basel-Frankfurt a.M., 1983Google Scholar
  28. 30.
    For this theory, see R. Smend, Verfassung und Verfassungsrecht, Berlin, 1928; see also the critical reply of H. Kelsen, Der Staat als Integration. Eine prinzipielle Auseinandersetzung, Vienna, 1930Google Scholar
  29. 31.
    H. Lasky, The Obsolescence of Federalism, in The New Republic, 5 May 1939, p. 367Google Scholar
  30. 37.
    See, for example, K. Lowenstein, The Value of Constitutions in Our Revolutionary Age, in A. Zurcher (ed.), Constitutions and Constitutional Trends since World War II, New York, 1955, p. 211Google Scholar
  31. 38.
    For Spain, see E. Aja, J. Tornos, T. Font, J. M. Perulles, E. Alberti’, El sistema juridico de las Comunidades Autònomas, Madrid, 1985, p. 142ff., 173ff. and 393ff.; for Belgium see J. M. van Bol, Les matiéres communautaires et régionales, in Journal des Tribunaux, 1981, p. 640Google Scholar
  32. 40.
    For the description of this phenomenon, from politological and juridical points of view respectively, see, for Italy, B. Dente, Governare la frammentazione, Bologna, 1985, and C. Desideri, L. Torchia, I raccordi tra Stato e Regioni, Milan, 1986 and, for West Germany, F. W. Scharpf, B. Reissert and F. Schnabel, Politikverflechtung• Theorie and Empine des koopera- Google Scholar
  33. 41.
    See L. Elia, Giustizia costituzionale e poteri legislativi decentrati, in Scritti in onore di C. Mortati, Milan, 1977, IV, p. 355ff.Google Scholar
  34. 42.
    See A. Pizzorusso, Delle fonti del diritto, in A. Scialoia, G. Branca (eds.), Commentario del codice civile, Bologna-Rome, 1977, p. 103ff. and G. Zagrebelsky, II sistema costituzionale delle fonti del diritto, Turin, 1984, p. 48ff.Google Scholar
  35. 44.
    For some examples of decisions made by European constitutional courts on this subject, see German Bundesverfassungsgericht decs. 1. 12. 1954 n.11 and 28. 11. 1973 n.19, and Italian Corte costituzionale dec. 26. 5. 1981 n.70Google Scholar
  36. 45.
    For some examples of this trend, see Spanish Tribunal constitucional decs. 28. 7. 1981 and 28. 4. 1982 n.32; German Bundesverfassungsgericht 22. 4. 1953 n.16 and 29. 11. 1961 n.22, n.23; Italian Corte costituzionale, dec. 29. 4. 1982 n.83Google Scholar
  37. 48.
    For an attempt at an economic analysis of decentralized functions, see, for example, A. Breton, A. Scott, The Economic Constitution of Federal State, Toronto, 1978, p. 10ff.; see also, for a comparison with a European regional state, S. Cassese, La regionalizzazione economica in Italia: un sistema alla ricerca di un equilibrio, in Le Regioni, 1984, p. 9Google Scholar
  38. 49.
    But even in this first case, the “bilateral” or pseudo-international nature does not automatically give rise to the supremacy of these sources over primary sources of Oberstaat and Gliedstaaten; on the difficulties of including such sources in the sources of law system, see A. Pizzorusso, Gli accordi tra i diversi livelli di governo: rapporti tra fonti normative e modelli convenzionali, S. Bartole, Gli accordi tra Stato e Regioni e tra Regioni, T. Öhlinger, Considerazioni critiche sulla prassi della cooperazione per accordi tra Federazione e Länder e tra Länder in Austria, G. Kisker, Riflessioni critiche sulla prassi della cooperazione per accordi tra il governo federale e i Länder e fra i Länder nella RFT, in Problemi di Amministrazione Pubblica. Commenti della Rivista, 2 (1986), p. 17ff. On the experience of the Swiss concordats, see H. Kehrli, Interkantonales Konkordatsrecht, Bern, 1968Google Scholar
  39. 50.
    See, for example, H. Wechsler, The Political Safeguards of Federalism: the Role of the States in the Composition and Selection of the National Government, in A. Macmahon, Federalism, cit., p. 97ff. and J. H. Choper, Judicial Review and the National Political Process,Chicago-London, 1980, p. 171ff.Google Scholar
  40. 51.
    See, for example, G. Kisker, Kooperation, cit., p. 281Google Scholar
  41. 52.
    See L. Paladin, Conclusioni, in Problemi di Amministrazione Pubblica, cit., p. 133ff.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Carrozza

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations