Computer Literacy and Procedural Knowledge

Part of the Springer Series in Language and Communication book series (SSLAN, volume 23)


With the rapid introduction of information technologies into all sectors of industrialised societies, many people have argued that the ability to understand and use such devices has become a necessary part of general education. The term “computer literacy” has been coined to refer to this ability. This chapter deals with cognitive characteristics and implications of computer literacy.


Episodic Memory Memory System Explicit Knowledge Procedural Knowledge Semantic Knowledge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baddeley, A. D. (1982). Domains of recollection. Psychological Review, 89, 708–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Graf, P., & Schacter, D.L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 501–528.Google Scholar
  3. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Larsen, S. F. (1983). Erindringens natur og historie (The nature and history of recollection). Psyke & Logos, 4, 277–307.Google Scholar
  5. Larsen, S. F. (1984). Kognitionens logikker Handling, sprog og datamater (The logics of cognition: Thinking, logic and computers). Psyke & Logos, 5, 221–242.Google Scholar
  6. Larsen, S. F. (1986). Procedural thinking, programming, and computer use. In E. Hollnagel, G. Mancini & D. Woods (Eds.), Intelligent decision support in process environments (pp. 145–150 ). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress. (Original work published 1959).Google Scholar
  8. Neisser, U. (1985). The role of theory in the ecological study of memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 272–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Olson, D. R. (1975). The languages of experience: On natural language and formal education. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 28, 363–373.Google Scholar
  10. Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257–281.Google Scholar
  11. Olson, D. R. (1985a, May). Computers as tools of the intellect. Educational Researcher, 14, 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Olson, D. R. (1985b). Intelligence and literacy: On the relations between intelligence and the technologies of representation and communication. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  13. Olson, D. R., & Bruner, J. S. (1974). Learning through experience and learning through media. In D. R. Olson (Ed.), Media and Symbols: The forms of expression, communication, and education (73rd yearbook of the NSSE) (pp. 125–150 ). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.Google Scholar
  14. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  15. Reiser, B. J., Black, J. B., & Abelson, R. P. (1985). Knowledge structures in the organization and retrieval of autobiographical memories. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 89–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Robinson, J. A., & Hawpe, L. (1986). Narrative thinking as a heuristic process. In T. R. Sarbin (Ed.), Narrative psychology (pp. 111–125 ). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  17. Rosch, E. H. (1974). Linguistic relativity. In A. Silverstein (Ed.), Human communication: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 95–121 ). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Sheil, B. A. (1980). Teaching procedural literacy. Proceedings of the 1980 ACM National Conference. Nashville.Google Scholar
  19. Sheil, B. A. (1981). Coping with complexity. Xerox Research Center, Report No. CIS-15. Palo Alto: Xerox Corporation. Also in R. A. Kasschau, R. Lachman, & K. R. Laughery (Eds.), Information technology and psychology (pp. 77–105). New York: Praeger, 1982.Google Scholar
  20. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Tulving, E. (1984). Précis of “Elements of episodic memory”. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 223–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there? American Psychologist, 40, 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Winograd, T (1975). Frame representations and the declarative-procedural controversy. In D. G. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and understanding (pp. 185–210 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  24. Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1985). Understanding computers and cognition: A new approach to design. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations