Advertisement

Literacy Practices and Literacy Myths

  • Brian V. Street
Part of the Springer Series in Language and Communication book series (SSLAN, volume 23)

Abstract

During the early 1980s there appeared in the United States, a number of collections of academic papers that claimed to represent the relationship between literacy and orality as a “continuum” rather than, as in much of the previous literature, as a “divide” (cf. Coulmas & Ehlich, 1983; Frawley, 1982; Olson, Hildyard & Torrance, 1985; Nystrand, 1982; Tannen, 1982b; Wagner, 1983; Whiteman, 1981). It appeared that the differences between literate and oral channels of communication had been overstated in the past and that scholars were now more concerned with overlap, mix and diverse functions in context. I shall examine some of these new representations, and argue that the supposed shift from divide to continuum is more rhetorical than real: that, in fact, many of the writers in this field continue to represent literacy as sufficiently different from orality in its social and cognitive consequences, that their findings scarcely differ from the classic concept of the “great divide” (cf. Goody, 1977). I shall argue that the implicit persistence of claims that the practitioners themselves would often explicitly reject can be explained with reference to the methodological and theoretical assumptions that underlie their work: in particular a narrow definition of social context, related to the split in linguistics between pragmatics and semantics; the reification of literacy in itself at the expense of recognition of its location in structures of power and ideology, also related to general linguistic assumptions about the “neutrality” of their object of study; and the restriction of “meaning” within traditional linguistics to the level of syntax.

Keywords

Discourse Analysis Oral Language Literacy Practice Literacy Event Ethnographic Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agar, M. (1986). Independents declared. Washington: SmithsonianGoogle Scholar
  2. Agar, M., & Hobbs, J. (1983). Natural plans: Using AI planning in the analysis of ethnograhic interviews. Ethos, 11, 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apple, M. (Ed.). (1982). Cultural and economic reproduction in education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  4. Asad, T. (1980). Anthropology and the analysis of ideology. Man, 14, 604–627.Google Scholar
  5. Bailey, R. W. (1985). Negotiation and meaning: Revisiting the `context of situation’. In J. D. Benson & W. S. Greaves (Eds.). (in press). Systemic functional approaches to discourse. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  6. Benson, J. D., & Greaves, W. S. (Eds.). (in press). Systemic functional approaches to discourse. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar
  7. Blank, M. (1982). Language and school failure: Some speculations about the relationship between oral and written language. In L. Feagans & D. Farran (Eds.), The language of children reared in poverty (pp. 75–93 ). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bledsoe, C., & Robey, K. (1986). Arabic literacy and secrecy among the Mende of Sierra Leone. Man, 21, 202–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bloch, M. (Ed.). (1975). Political language and oratory. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bloch, M. ( 1986, June). Literacy and enlightenment. Paper presented at Anthropology/Linguistics workshop, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1976). Systems of education and systems of thought. In R. Dale, G. Esland & M. MacDonald (Eds.), Schooling and capitalism (pp. 192–200 ). London: Open University/Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56–289 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Coulmas, F., & Ehlich, K. (Eds.). (1983). Writing in focus. New York: Mouton.Google Scholar
  14. Coulthard, M. (1977). An introduction to discourse analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  15. Craig, R., & Tracy, K. (1983). Conversational coherence: Form, structure and strategy. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Dillon, G., Coleman, L., Fahnestock, J., & Agar, M. (1985). Review article of discourse analysis and pragmatics. Language, 61, 446–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frawley, W. (Ed.). (1982). Linguistics and literacy. Proceedings of the Delaware Symposium on Language Studies. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  18. Goody, J. (1977). Domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Grillo, R. ( 1986, April). Aspects of language and class. Paper presented at Lancaster Conference on Linguistics and Politics.Google Scholar
  20. Grillo, R., Pratt, G., & Street, B. (1987). Linguistics and anthropology. Mimeo. To appear in J. Lyons (Ed.), New horizons in linguistics, (Vol. 2 ). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  21. Hall, S., Hobson, D., Lowe, A., & Willis, P. (Eds.). (1980). Culture, media, language. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  22. Heath, S. B. (1982). What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home and at school. Language in Society, 11, 49–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hymes, D. (Ed.). (1964). Language in culture and society. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  24. Hymes, D. (Ed.). (1964). Language in culture and society New York: Harper & RowGoogle Scholar
  25. Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  26. Keenan, E. L. (1976). The universality of conversational implicature. Language in Society, 5, 67–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lyons, J. (1981). Language, meaning and context. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
  29. Mace, J. (1979). Working with words. London: Chameleon.Google Scholar
  30. Nystrand, M. (Ed.). (1982). What writers know: The language, process and structure of written discourse. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  31. Olson, D. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 254–279.Google Scholar
  32. Olson, D., Hildyard, A., & Torrance, N. (Eds.). (1985). Literacy, language and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Parkin, D. (1984). Political language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 13, 345–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shuman, A. (1983). Collaborative literacy in an urban, multi-ethnic neighbourhood. In D. Wagner (Ed.), Literacy and ethnicity. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 42, 69–81.Google Scholar
  35. Strathern, M. (1985). Feminism and anthropology. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  36. Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Street, B. ( 1985, October). Literacy and orality as ideological constructions: Some problems in cross-cultural studies. Paper presented at the Copenhagen Conference From Orality to Literacy and Back.Google Scholar
  38. Street, B. (1986). Walter Ong on literacy. Aspects, 1, 2–16.Google Scholar
  39. Street, B. (1987). Literacy and social change: The significance of social context in the development of literacy programmes In D. Wagner (Ed.), The future of literacy in a changing world (pp. 48–63). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  40. Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  41. Tannen, D. (1982a). The myth of orality and literacy. In W. Frawley (Ed.), Linguistics and literacy (pp. 37–50 ). Proceedings of the Delaware Symposium on Language Studies. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  42. Tannen, D. (Ed.). (1982b). Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy. New Jersey: Ablex.Google Scholar
  43. Wagner, D. (Ed.). (1983). Literacy and ethnicity. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 42.Google Scholar
  44. Whiteman, M. (Ed.). (1981). Writing: The nature, development and teaching of written communication. Vol. 1. Variation in writing: Functional and linguistic and cultural differences. New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian V. Street

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations