Abstract
Issues concerning literalness of meaning range all the way from folk linguistics to axiomatic features of formalized semantic theory. Acceptance of “literal” as a primitive, undefined term in delineation of an autonomous field of “pure” semantics may hence be in part due to the intuitive appeal of pervading pretheoretical notions such as, for instance (Goffman, 1976, p. 303), “... the common sense notion... that the word in isolation will have a general basic, or most down-to-earth meaning...”. Such presuppositions seem to form part of the myth of literal meaning in our highly literate societies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allwood, J. (1981). On the distinction between semantics and pragmatics. In W. Klein W. Levelt (Eds.), Crossing the boundaries in linguistics. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Baker, G. P.,Hacker, P. M. S. (1980). Wittgenstein. Meaning and understanding. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bakhtin, M. (1973). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. Ann Arbor: Ardis.
Barwise, J. (1985). The situation in logic: Part 2. Conditionals and conditional information. Mimeo; Stanford University.
Barwise, J. Perry, J. (1983). Situations and attitudes. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press
Bühler, K. (1934). Sprachtheorie. Jena: Fischer.
Derrida, J. (1974). Of grammatology. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Dreyfus, H. L. (1979). What computers can’t do. The limits of artificial intelligence. New York: Harper.
Eco, U. (1977). A theory of semantics. London: McMillan.
Flores, C. F., Winograd, T. (1983). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Mimeo, Stanford University.
Frege, G. (1969). Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung. Fünf logische Studien. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck Ruprecht.
F0llesdal, D. (1983). Situation semantics and the “slingshot” argument. Erkenntnis
Geva, E., Olson, D. (1983). Children’s story telling. First Language, 4, 85–109.
Goffman, E. (1976). Replies and responses. Language in Society, 5, 257–313.
Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of worldmaking. Hassocks: Harvester Press.
Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, I&II. Frankfurt: Suhr-kamp Verlag.
Harman, G. (1974). Thought. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Hausser, R. R. (1983). On vagueness. Journal of Semantics, 2, 273–302.
Hildyard, A., Olson, D. R. (1982). On the structure and meaning of prose text. In W. Otto S. White (Eds.), Reading Expository Material (pp. 155–184 ). New York: Academic Press.
Hintikka, J., Kulas, J. (1982). Russell vindicated: Towards a general theory of definite descriptions. Journal of Semantics, 1, 387–397.
Katz, J. J. (1981). Literal meaning and logical theory. Journal of Philosophy, 78, 203–233.
Kripke, S. (1977). Identity and necessity. In S. P. Schwartz (Ed.), Naming, necessity, and natural kinds (pp. 66–101 ). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Kristeva, J. (1978). Desire in language. A semiotic approach to literature and art. New York: Columbia University Press.
Levelt, W.J.M. (1983). The speaker’s organization of discourse. In S. Hattori K. Inoue (Eds.), Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Linguists (pp. 278–279 ). Tokyo: Proceedings Publishing Committee.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1984). Spontaneous self-repairs in speech: Processes and represen-tations. Mimeo, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.
Levelt, W.J.M., Cutler, A. (1983). Prosodic marking in speech repair. Journal of Semantics, 2, 205–217.
Linell, P. (1982). The written language bias in linguistics. Linköping University, Studies in Communication 2.
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics Cambridge University Press.
Malinowski, B. (1984). “Magic, science and religion” and other essays. Glencoe: Free Press.
Marslen-Wilson, W., Komisarjevsky-Tyler, L. (1980). The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition, 8, 1–17.
Maturana, H.P., Varela, F.J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition. The realization of the living. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Mukarovsky, J. (1976). On poetic language. Lisse: Peter de Ridder.
Naess, A. (1969). Hvilken verden er den virkelige? [Which world is the real one?] Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Newman, D. (1982). Perspective taking versus content in understanding lies. The Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 4, 26–29.
Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257–281.
Olson, D. R., Torrance, N. G. (1985). Literacy and cognitive development: A con-ceptual transformation in the early school years. Mimeo. To appear in S. Meadows (Ed.), Issues in childhood cognitive development. London: Methuen Co.
Popper, K. R. (1971). Objective knowledge. An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clar-endon Press.
Putnam, H. (1978). Meaning and the moral sciences. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1980). Computation and cognition: Issues in the foundations of cognitive science. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 111–169.
Rommetveit, R. (1974). On message structure. A framework for the study of language and communication, London: Wiley.
Rommetveit, R. (1979). On “meanings” of acts and what is meant by what is said in a pluralistic social world. In M. Brenner (Ed.), The Structure of Action (pp. 108–149 ). Oxford: Blackwell Mott.
Rommetveit, R. (1983 a). Prospective social psychological contributions to a truly interdisciplinary understanding of ordinary language. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2, 89–104.
Rommetveit, R. (1983 b). In search of a truly interdisciplinary semantics. A sermon on hopes of salvation from hereditary sins. Journal of Semantics,2, 1–28.
Rommetveit, R. (1984). The role of language in the creation and transmission of social representations. In R. M. Farr S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 331–359 ). Paris and Cambridge: Maison des Sciences de l’Homme and Cambridge University Press.
Rommetveit R. (1985). Language acquisition as increasing linguistic structuring of experience and symbolic behavior control. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 183–204 ). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schutz, A. (1945). On multiple realities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 5, 533–576.
Searle, J. R. (1974). On speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1978). Literal meaning. Erkenntnis, 13, 207–224.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 92–123 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, S (1970). Reasons and causes. In R. Borger F. Cioffi (Eds.), Explanation in the behavioral sciences (pp. 1–26 ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vologinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language, New York: Wiley.
Winograd, T. (1985). Moving the semantic fulcrum. Linguistics and Philosophy, 8, 91–104.
von Wright, G. H. (1974). Causality and determinism. New York: Columbia University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rommetveit, R. (1988). On Literacy and the Myth of Literal Meaning. In: Säljö, R. (eds) The Written World. Springer Series in Language and Communication, vol 23. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72877-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72877-8_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-72879-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-72877-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive