Skip to main content

Application of Bench-Mounted Saws for Precision Replacement Arthroplasty of the Arthritic Knee — The Questor Systems

  • Conference paper
Surgery and Arthroscopy of the Knee

Abstract

Prosthetic replacement arthroplasty has revolutionised surgical treatment for arthritis of hip and knee joints, but as time passes, the number of failures, (mainly) due to loosening of the implant, increases. Although poor design and material features have a recognised importance in loosening, a malpositioned prosthesis must carry the greatest responsibility [1–4]. The precision involved in the manufacturing process of the implant is set to a level of tolerance ±0. 2 mm. This is, in all likelihood, a factor of over ten times greater precision than current bone cutting/placement techniques. The geometric accuracy employed in the construction of the implants sets a standard to be emulated in the orientation and accurate placement of the prosthesis; it recommends a comparably high level of placemealignment accuracy for the bone cuts.

Questor is the copyright name given to orthopaedic devices developed by the Clinical Mechanics Group at Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lotke PA, Ecker ML (1977) Influence of positioning of prosthesis in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 59:77–79

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hvid I, Nielsen S (1984) Total condylar knee arthroplasty. Prosthetic component positioning and radiolucent lines. Acta Orthop Scand 55:160–165

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kagan A II (1977) Mechanical causes of loosening in knee joint replacement. J Bio-mech 10:387–391

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bargren JH, Blaka JD, Freeman MAR (1986) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty — correlated biomechanical and clinical observations. Clin Orthop 173:178–183

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bargren JH, Freeman MAR, Swanson SAV, Todd RC (1976) ICLH (Freeman/Swan-son) arthroplasty in the treatment of arthritis knee, a two to four-year review. Clin Or-thop 120:65

    Google Scholar 

  6. Insall J et al. (1979) The total condylar knee prosthesis: the first 5 years. Clin Orthop 68:77

    Google Scholar 

  7. Townley CO (1985) The anatomic total knee resurfacing arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 192:82–96

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cloutier JM (1983) Results of total knee arthroplasty with a nonconstrained prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 65(7):906–919

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hungerford DS, Krackow KA, Kenna RV (1980) The Howmedica universal total knee instrument system. Howmedica, Rutherford, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hungerford DS, Krackow KA, Kenna RV (1982) The porous coated anatomic total knee. Orthop Clin North Am 13(1):103

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hungerford DS, Krackow KA (1985) Total joint arthroplasty of the knee. Clin Orthop 192:23, 33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Greenberg RL, Kenna RV, Hungerford DS, Krackow KA (1984) Instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty. In: Hungerford DS, Krackow KA, Kenna RV (eds) Total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive approach. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 36–40

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krackow KA (1983) Approaches to planning lower extremity alignment for total knee arthroplasty and osteotomy about the knee. Adv Orthop Surg 7:69

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wevers HW, Espin E, Cooke TDV (1987) Orthopaedic sawblades. A case study. J Arthroplasty 2:43–46

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cameron HU, Pileiar RM, Macnab I (1976) The rate of bone ingrowth into porous metal. J Biomed Mater Res 10:195–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, Weatherley GC (1981) Osteogenic phenomena across endosteal bone-implant spaces with porous surfaced intramedullary implants. Acta Orthop Scand 52:145–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cooke TDV, Saunders G, Siu D, Yoshioka Y, Wevers H (1985) Universal bone cutting device for precision knee replacement arthroplasty and osteotomy. J Biomed Eng 7:45–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoshioka Y, Siu DW, Cooke TDV (1987) The anatomy and functional axes of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 69:873–880

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cooke, T.D.V., Harada, Y., Saunders, G., Siu, D., Wevers, H., Yoshioka, Y. (1988). Application of Bench-Mounted Saws for Precision Replacement Arthroplasty of the Arthritic Knee — The Questor Systems. In: Müller, W., Hackenbruch, W. (eds) Surgery and Arthroscopy of the Knee. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72782-5_110

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72782-5_110

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-72784-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-72782-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics