Ethylene Binding and Evidence that Binding InVivo and InVitro is to the Physiological Receptor
A major question concerning the role of ethylene is, “How does it act?” Does it act as a hormone by binding to a receptor, or does it act as a cofactor in some reaction, or does it act as a product of an enzyme which catalyzes the reaction of ethylene with something else? All of these questions have been considered and attempts have been made to determine which is correct. Abeles et al. (4) and Suffix (6) have conducted experiments to determine if hydrogen is exchanged during ethylene action. The results with deuterium were negative. Provided that the method is sufficiently sensitive, hydrogen exchange seems to be ruled out. Experiments have also been conducted to see if the conversion of ethylene to ethylene oxide and some subsequent action of that metabolite is the mode of action of ethylene (7). Although the correlation of ethylene oxidation and action was fairly good, it has been shown that inactivation of the ethylene-oxidizing system does not prevent the action of ethylene (1). This seems to rule out the oxidation of ethylene as the primary mode of action of ethylene.
KeywordsEthylene Oxidation Mung Bean Ethylene Response Ethylene Action Bean Seed
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 3.Abeles, F. B. Ethylene in Plant Biology. Academic Press, New York. 302 p. 1973.Google Scholar
- 4.Abeles, F. B., J. M. Ruth, L. E. Forrence, and G. R. Leather. Mechanisms of hormone action. Use of deuterated ethylene to measure isotopic exchange with plant material and the biological effects of deuterated ethylene. Plant Physiol. 49: 669–671. 1972.Google Scholar
- 9.Cotton, F. A., and G. Wilkinson. Advanced Inorganic Chemistry. John Wiley and Sons. New York. 1980. 1396 p.Google Scholar
- 10.Goren, R., A. K. Mattoo, and J. D. Anderson. Ethylene binding during leaf development and senescence and its inhibition by silver nitrate. J. Plant Physiol. 117: 243–248. 1984.Google Scholar
- 11.Goren, R., and E. C. Sisler. Ethylene binding: Some parameters in excised tobacco leaves. Tobacco Sci. 28: 110–115. 1984.Google Scholar
- 12.Goren, R., and E. C. Sisler. Ethylene-binding characteristics in Phaseolus, Citrus, and Ligustrum plants. Plant Growth Regul. 14: 43–54. 1986.Google Scholar
- 13.Sisler, E. C. Ethylene activity of some w-acceptor compounds. Tobacco Sci. 21: 43–45. 1977.Google Scholar
- 15.Sisler, E. C. Ethylene-binding properties of a Triton X-100 extract of mung bean sprouts. Plant Growth Regul. 1: 211–218. 1982.Google Scholar
- 16.Sisler, E. C. Ethylene binding in normal, rin, and nor mutant tomatoes. J. Plant Growth Regul. 1: 219–2: 26. 1982.Google Scholar
- 17.Sisler, E. C. Distribution and properties of ethylene-binding component from plant tissue. In Y. Fuchs and E. Chalutz, eds., “Ethylene: Biochemical, Physiological and Applied Aspects,” pp. 45–54. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague. 1984.Google Scholar
- 18.Sisler, E. C., and A. Pian. Effect of ethylene and cyclic olefins on tobacco leaves. Tobacco Sci. 17: 68–72. 1972.Google Scholar
- 22.Warner, H. L. The synthesis and mode of action of ethylene in etiolated pea seedlings. Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University, Lafayette, Indiana. 1970.Google Scholar