Advertisement

Genetic Constraints on the Evolution of Phenotypic Plasticity

Abstract

In many species, dramatic phenotypic variation can be observed among individuals that are allowed to develop in different environments. Such environment-related phenotypic variation need not always indicate genetic differentiation; phenotypic variation among genetically identical individuals can result from the susceptibility to environmental influences. A change in the average phenotype expressed by a genotype in different macro-environments is generally called phenotypic plasticity (cf. Bradshaw 1965). Although variation due to micro-environmental effects within environments (“developmental instability”, Bradshaw 1985) is considered in the models discussed here, the objective of this chapter is to discuss the evolutionary mechanisms that can produce an advantageous phenotypic response to spatial variation in the environment, that is, adaptive phenotypic plasticity.

Keywords

Character State Genetic Correlation Phenotypic Plasticity Reaction Norm Host Plant Species 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkinson BG, Walden DB (eds) (1985) Changes in Eukaryotic gene expression in response to environmental stress. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernays E (1986) Diet-induced head allometry among foliage-chewing insects and its importance for graminivores. Science 231: 495–497PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradshaw AD (1965) Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv Genet 13: 115–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Briggs D, Walters SM (1984) Plant variation and evolution. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Clough JM, Teeri JA, Alberte RS (1979) Photosynthetic adaptation of Solanum dulcamara L. to sun and shade environments. I. A comparison of sun and shade populations. Oecologia (Berl) 38: 13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dickerson GE (1955) Genetic slippage in response to selection for multiple objectives. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 20: 25–32Google Scholar
  7. Falconer DS (1952) The problem of environment and selection. Am Nat 86: 293–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics. 2nd ed. Longman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Fernando RL, Knights SA, Gianola D (1984) On a method of estimating the genetic correlation between characters measured in different experimental units. Theor Appl Genet 67: 175–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Freeman GH (1973) Statistical methods for the analysis of genotype-environment interactions. Heredity 31: 339–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gause GF (1947) Problems of evolution. Trans Conn Acad Sci 37: 17–68Google Scholar
  12. Gilbert JJ (1966) Rotifer ecology and embryological induction. Science 151: 1234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harvell CD (1984) Predator-induced defense in a marine bryozoan. Science 224: 1357–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hochachka PW, Somero GN (1984) Biochemical adaptation. Princeton Univ PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Princeton, NJ Jain SK (1978) Inheritance of phenotypic plasticity in soft chess, Bromus mollis L. ( Gramineae ). Experientia (Basel) 4: 835–836Google Scholar
  16. Khan MA, Antonovics J, Bradshaw AD (1976) Adaptation to heterogenous environments. III. The inheritance of response to spacing in flax and linseed (Linum usitatissimum). Aust J Agric Res 27: 649–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuhlmann HW, Heckmann K (1985) Interspecific morphogens regulating prey-predator relationships in protozoa. Science 227: 1347–1349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lande R (1979) Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33: 402–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lande R (1980) The genetic covariance between characters maintained by pleiotropic mutations. Genetics 94: 203–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lande R, Arnold S (1983). The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Levins R (1968) Evolution in changing environments. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  22. Nijhout HF, Wheeler DE (1982) Juvenile hormone and the physiological basis of insect polymorphisms. Q Rev Biol 57: 109–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Orzack SH (1985) Population dynamics in variable environments V. The genetics of homeostasis revisited. Am Nat 125: 550–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Prosser CL (1973) Comparative animal physiology. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  25. Rausher MD (1984) Tradeoffs in performance on different hosts: Evidence from within and between site variation in the beetle,Deloyala guttata. Evolution 38: 582–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scheiner SM, Goodnight (1984) The comparison of phenotypic plasticity and genetic variation in populations of the grass Danthonia spicata. Evolution 38: 845–855Google Scholar
  27. Schmalhausen II (1949). Factors of evolution: the theory of stabilizing selection. Blakiston, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  28. Schlichting CA (1986). The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17: 667–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schlichting C, Levin LA (1984) Phenotypic plasticity of annual phlox: tests of some hypotheses. Am J Bot 71: 252–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shaw RG (1986) Response to density in a wild population of the perennial herb Salvia lyrata: variation among families. Evolution 40: 492–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Teeri JA (1978) Environmental and genetic control of phenotypic adaptation to drought in Potentilla glandulosa Lindi. Oecologia (Berl) 37: 29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Turelli M (1984) Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch’s zeta meets the abdominal bristle. Theor Popul Biol 25: 138–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Via S (1984a) The quantitative genetics of polyphagy in an insect herbivore. I. Genotype-environment interaction in larval performance on different host plant species. Evolution 38: 881–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Via S (1984b) The quantitative genetics of polyphagy in an insect herbivore. H. Genetic correlations in larval performance within and across host plants. Evolution 38: 896–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Via S, Lande R (1985) Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39: 505–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Via S, Lande R (1987) Evolution of genetic variability in a spatially heterogeneous environment: effects of genotype-environment interaction. Genet ResGoogle Scholar
  37. Wheeler DE, Nijhout HF (1981). Soldier determination in ants: New role for juvenile hormone. Science 213: 361–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yamada Y (1962) Genotype x environment interaction and genetic correlation of the same trait under different environments. Jpn J Genet 37: 498–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Via
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Entomology and Section of Ecology and Systematics, Comstock HallCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations